49 pages • 1 hour read
David Henry HwangA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section contains racist language against Asian people.
The action resumes in 1997 when Asian American groups file a complaint with the US Commission on Civil Rights against the harassment of Asian Americans suspected of violating campaign finance laws. Multiple Republican Congress members are quoted in the press making racist remarks about Asian people as “very crafty people” and using offensive puns and mimicry like “two Huangs don’t make a right,” “tip of the egg roll,” and “no raise money, no get bonus” (50). Another member of Congress decries how impossible it is to pronounce Asian names and argues that campaign contributions from people with these names are likely money from foreigners.
In 1999, a New York Times piece written by NWOAOC (Name Withheld on Advice of Counsel) reports that a Chinese American computer scientist in Los Alamos has been given lie detector tests and is under investigation.
The scene shifts to HYH reading a fax to DHH from Marcus. Marcus implores DHH to attend a rally to support Wen Ho Lee, the nuclear scientist accused of treason. Marcus surmises that the recent events targeting Asian Americans signify that the US is gearing to make China and by association Asian Americans into enemies of the state. DHH is indifferent to the investigation and flippantly comments to his father that Lee could be guilty. DHH then turns and speaks directly to the audience, explaining that in doing research for this play, he read a transcript from the FBI’s interrogation of Lee. Actors reenact the interrogation and recite excerpts in which the FBI agent calls Wen Ho Lee a spy and threatens to put his wife under a lie detector test. The agent mentions the execution of the Rosenbergs. Lee maintains his innocence. The scene cuts to Marcus and a group of protesters chanting, “Asian American Does Not Equal Spy” and “Who’s Next” (53).
DHH chats online with a user named YELLOWGURL8. She tells him she feels alone as a Vietnamese girl growing up in Omaha and that she has read all his plays. He asks her what she is wearing. DHH’s answering machine interrupts the chat session and picks up a message from his mother. She informs him of an upsetting New York Times piece about his father that will appear tomorrow morning. The same writer of the Wen Ho Lee article, NWOAOC, reports that Far East National Bank, where Henry Y. Hwang is the CEO and David Henry Hwang was a director, has been filtering Chinese money into the United States.
DHH talks to his parents about how to handle the Senate investigation. HYH is eager to be subpoenaed so he can tell his side of the story. He calls the New York Times reporter a racist for describing him as short in the article. HYH envisions his moment on television as an awakening for the country to see how Asian people are discriminated against. He believes his appearance will lead to improved treatment for Asian Americans and a nomination for him to run as Governor of California. He references Marcus Gee as a role model and sees himself as a hero for Asian people.
NWOAOC requests a meeting with DHH under the pretense of giving him an opportunity to clear his name. DHH explains that he worked at the bank out of a sense of filial piety and duty to help his father and the Chinese American community, particularly the immigrants and refugees who rely on the bank’s services. He saw his role as a way to empower Chinese Americans “By Any Means Necessary” and “fight the power” held by “white America” (58). NWOAOC interprets DHH’s words to imply he is loyal to China rather than America. He pressures DHH to give up evidence against his father and asks him if HYH visits friends in China or has ever felt resentment toward America. He asks DHH to describe whether his father feels more Chinese or American. DHH points out the hypocrisy of the question, which would not be asked of a white person, and argues that his father has always praised America. NWOAOC says he has no agenda and has enough evidence from this interview to write his story.
DHH realizes that NWOAOC is the same reporter behind all the articles insinuating Asian people are the “yellow peril.” NWOAOC has written multiple pieces that represent Asian Americans as disloyal to the United States. He catches the reporter making a statement that implies being Chinese and American is incompatible, whereas being white and American is not. DHH tells NWOAOC that he has given DHH enough evidence to write a play about him. Though DHH does not have permission to use the reporter’s real name, he can use a pseudonym and expose how he has used his role in the press to perpetuate discrimination against Asian people.
Due to the investigation, HYH is denied his application for a new bank charter. He is also diagnosed with an aggressive cancer and undergoes chemotherapy. He tells DHH that he no longer believes in America and that the system gives the advantage to mainstream banks over minority banks. He reminisces about watching Jimmy Stewart films in Shanghai and is disillusioned that he once believed America was a place where he could take a stand and be heard. HYH declares that his real life is no longer in America and forgoes continuing with his cancer-fighting treatments. He tells DHH, “I’m ready to go. And I’ll do it my way” (64).
Marcus hears about HYH’s illness and offers DHH his help, which only irritates DHH further. DHH asks him why he continues to fake his identity, and Marcus explains that it feels good to belong to the community. He tells DHH that he is also under investigation, but DHH retorts that he could easily save himself by taking off his “mask.” The comment sparks an idea in DHH’s mind, and he tells Marcus if he truly loves the community, then he should go public with his real identity. The revelation that the government has been spending millions of taxpayer money to target Asian people only to end up accusing a “regular American” could help discredit the investigations’ rationale to uncover “evil Chinese spies” (65). Marcus agrees to the plan and accepts the consequences that he will be ostracized from the community. DHH also decides to go public with his culpability in helping to create and maintain the lie. He agrees to lose face if Marcus is willing to lose his.
Leah reads about Marcus’s identity in the newspaper and breaks up with him. DHH recaps that after their story broke, the Chinese espionage scandals of the 1990s slowly faded away. HYH was never subpoenaed, and Wen Ho Lee spent nine months in solitary confinement before charges against him were dropped. The judge presiding over Lee’s case apologized to him for his unfair treatment. An aide to Senator Fred Thompson declares that attention has shifted to the Middle East since the 9/11 attacks, but China will remain the “real enemy” of the nation in the 21st century. In 2005, Henry Y. Hwang dies of cancer at the age of 77.
At HYH’s memorial service, DHH tells Marcus that he thinks what really killed his father was that he had lost his American dream. Marcus replies that he is proof that such a dream is possible. DHH begins to vehemently disagree with him, and Marcus abruptly asks DHH why he created him.
The scene shifts to a metatheatrical encounter in which Marcus says he is a character that DHH created for his play. DHH tries to get Marcus to stick to his lines, but Marcus urges DHH to be honest with himself. DHH insists that he wants to keep the ambiguity between reality and fiction throughout the play. Finally, he admits that the play is his way of coping with his father’s death and his own discomfort as a representative of the Asian American community who performs his own version of yellowface. DHH created the character of Marcus to confound the meanings of “Asian,” “American,” “race,” and “nation” (68). He also created Marcus as an homage to his father’s dream that he could be anyone he wanted. Marcus is a wish-fulfillment for the post-racial world, free from racial discrimination and prejudice, that his father had always wanted. Pleased with DHH’s honest confession, Marcus tells him he is no longer needed and asks DHH to write him a happy ending.
The same track of Dong folk music from the opening scene plays as DHH narrates that he has sent Marcus to a Chinese village called Zhencong. Marcus recites his final email to DHH, telling him he has been in China for nine months. The Dong people have seen him for who he is and have given him a “face.” They invite him to join them in their communal song, and Marcus observes, “the music began to speak to me, in words only I could hear” (69). As he sings, Marcus hears lyrics that are his interpretation of what the song means. He recites: “Get over yourself / [...] For nothing of value / Nothing which lasts / Nothing human / Is ever pure” (69). His lyrics explain that the song is made up of diverse voices that have traveled a “messy” path to come together. Marcus feels he has found what he lost and can return home with a renewed sense of hope. DHH closes the play by telling the audience that for Marcus, the play ends. As for himself, he is still in search of his own face.
The play’s final scenes are set during the height of anti-Asian sentiment in US politics during the late 1990s, emphasizing the theme of The Historical Marginalization of Asian Americans. Hwang once again blurs the lines between reality and fiction by citing real quotations from US Congress members who used racist and derogatory language to describe Asian Americans. In particular, Senator Sam Brownback’s racist mimicry of how Asian people speak draws a parallel between yellowface on the theatrical stage and the political stage. Hwang demonstrates how xenophobic attitudes about the “yellow peril,” in which Asian people are seen as an invading threat to the (white) nation, are not in the past. The persistence of racist discourse frames Asian Americans as perpetual foreigners who are untrustworthy and likely to betray the country. The investigations during the campaign contributions scandal and the Wen Ho Lee case targeted Asian Americans as natural traitors and spies.
Hwang emphasizes the hostile environment against Asian Americans by including scenes where DHH must defend his father and himself against the reporter, NWOAOC. NWOAOC claims to be impartial, yet his line of questioning perpetuates a paradoxical, racist logic that frames Asian Americans as suspicious foreigners no matter how they respond. NWOAOC asks DHH to answer questions about his father such as “How often does he go to China? Who does he see there? Has he ever expressed anger, bitterness, resentment towards America? Does he still have relatives in the old country? Friends?” (60). These questions ignore the reality that many Asian Americans regard themselves as transnational and maintain vibrant and fulfilling connections with their homeland and heritage. To the reporter and his readers, an Asian American who visits and has friends in their heritage country is suspicious, and Asian American resentment and anger against American institutions that discriminate against them can be interpreted as signs of disloyalty.
In DHH’s interview with the reporter, Hwang lays bare the double-bind that racist logic like NWOAOC’s puts Asian Americans in. DHH points out that NWOAOC’s statements about race and nationality imply that “there’s a conflict—between being Chinese and being American'' (60). Asian Americans like DHH face an irresolvable dilemma: They are too Asian to be American, and too American to be Asian. DHH exposes the reporter’s implicit bias against Asian Americans and tells him that he has collected enough of his own evidence to write a new play. In DHH’s version of the story, the tragic irony of the investigations into HYH’s finances and his subsequent death is that he was not a traitor to his country at all, but rather that no matter how sincerely HYH loved and tried to assimilate into American culture, his national origin and racial background meant that it would never be enough. DHH experiences the same dilemma from the opposite direction: Born and raised in America and only weakly tied to his Chinese cultural heritage, DHH is too Chinese to be fully American and too American to be Chinese. The true challenge of Cultural Identity and Authenticity, the play suggests, is that DHH and HYH are never allowed to express their authentic cultural identities as both American and Asian because the logic of people like NWOAOC makes their identities invalid.
In the final scenes, Hwang disrupts the play’s blend of reality and fiction and introduces a metatheatrical encounter between DHH and Marcus. The encounter functions as a type of postmodern twist, where Hwang’s fictional double, DHH, reveals that he has created his own double in Marcus. DHH explains that creating the character of Marcus allowed him to “take words like ‘Asian’ and ‘American,’ like ‘race’ and ‘nation,’ mess them up so bad no one has any idea what they even mean anymore” (68-69). For Hwang, Cultural Identity and Authenticity are not simply about determining the truth behind masks and alter-egos, since behind each double is yet another double. Identity is like a vanishing point where no original and fixed core constitutes an authentic self, only points of reference. Marcus’s experience of singing the Dong people’s communal song connotes a similar postmodern message. He interprets the song as a reminder that “nothing [...] is ever pure” and that the definitive “soul” of China he searches for will never be singular (690). Hwang’s characters embody a postmodern subjectivity constituted by their intersecting identities and the discourses and ideologies that can simultaneously silence them or give them agency.
By David Henry Hwang