logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Anderson Cooper, Katherine Howe

Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Historical Context: The Gilded Age

The period of American history known as the Gilded Age was an important period in the rise of the Vanderbilt family. It spanned from roughly the end of the Civil War to the dawning of the 20th century. Some restrict it more specifically to the years between 1877 (the end of Reconstruction in the South) and 1896 (when an economic depression occurred). The period took its name from a novel called The Gilded Age: A Tale of To-Day by Mark Twain and Charles Dudley Warner, which satirized the excess and corruption for which the era was known. In these decades, business greatly expanded in the United States, pulling the country out of the economic downturn caused by the Civil War. One important part of this boom was due to the expansion of railroads, from which the Vanderbilts made a large part of their fortune. The nation was expanding ever westward, eventually all the way to the Pacific Ocean, and railroads provided the best way to move goods and people for trade and migration.

It was during this time that the economy of the United States grew to become among the largest in the world. By the end of the 19th century, the nation had overtaken Great Britain in manufacturing. Innovation helped spur this on, including in the areas of electricity, communication, and the internal combustion engine. Large corporations became larger as industries integrated to the point of monopoly. This was a time before any significant business regulation or the advent of federal income tax, so enormous profits could be made. Other families joining the Vanderbilts in amassing extreme wealth were the Rockefellers (oil), the Carnegies (steel), and the Morgans and the Mellons (banking and finance).

Members of the upper classes spent lavishly on houses, home decoration, and art collections, among other things. Having a summer home in places like Newport, Rhode Island, and Bar Harbor, Maine, came into vogue, and the Vanderbilts eagerly joined that competition to have the biggest and best. As the authors note, The Breakers, the name for Cornelius and Alice Vanderbilt’s summer home in Newport, encompassed 70 rooms and square footage three times the size of the White House.

Social Context: Social Darwinism

of Species, published in 1859, in which Darwin explained his theory of evolution. This theory held that the population of living organisms expanded or contracted through a process of natural selection based on their inherited traits. In later editions, Darwin used the phrase “survival of the fittest” to describe this, a saying that entered mainstream language. Derived from this theory, social Darwinism applied this theory to people and their place in society. According to its proponents, only those most fit for society succeeded, and some people were simply born with greater natural ability.

What, then, did it mean to succeed? Often this was boiled down to having financial success. This went hand in glove in a country as influenced by Calvinism—a strain of Protestant Christianity—as the United States was. Calvinism included the idea of “predestination,” which meant that God had preselected certain people for salvation; it was a done deal at birth, entirely out of their control. This fatalistic view echoes the idea of social Darwinism in that nothing could be done to change the outcome of people’s lives.

Proponents argued that the strong and more able would rise to the top and lead society, and trying to restrain them or interfere with this would only be harmful to society in the long run. One prominent Yale professor of social sciences wrote that “we all owe to each other good-will, mutual respect, and mutual guarantees of liberty and security. Beyond this nothing can be affirmed as a duty of one group to another in a free state” (Sumner, William Graham. What Social Classes Owe to Each Other. Harper & Brothers, 1883, 168-69).

Thus, intervention of any kind was useless. This translated into a “hands-off” system of laissez-faire economics in which government intervention was minimal. The ruling classes saw this as the proper role of government, leaving them to do as they pleased, which would advance society overall, but also leaving them to amass their wealth unhindered. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text