26 pages • 52 minutes read
William Lloyd GarrisonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Garrison stakes much of his argument on the immorality of slavery. He argues this point in both religious and secular terms. While this might seem obvious to the contemporary reader, Garrison wrote at a time when there were widespread counterarguments to his position. It would have been common for his audience to read and hear opinions that held slavery to be utterly moral and justified, having a basis in both Biblical and legal tradition.
Garrison takes pains to assert a divine morality that is not specific to any religious denomination. He wishes, he says, “to derive the assistance of all religions” (Paragraph 5). Readers would have been aware that Quakers, Presbyterians, and (Northern) Baptists were often associated with abolition, though nearly every group had members on both sides. Rather than following religious dogma as a guide to morality, Garrison invokes the religious but ecumenical concept of natural rights (see below) to bridge religious differences. That people are “endowed by their Creator” with rights both acknowledges the divine origins of equality and also leaves room for disagreement over theological details. He also invokes the American Revolution, seen by many as a moral war of the oppressed against the oppressor, as a touchstone for his argument. He draws an analogy between the struggle against slavery and the Revolution.
Garrison was deeply religious, though not a member of any particular church. He was influenced by the tenets of Protestantism that called for individuals to read and interpret the Bible for themselves rather than accept an interpretation given by a church. “To the Public” makes several Biblical references that a Bible-literate, 19th-century audience would quickly recognize. Garrison writes, for example, that people’s indifference to slavery—apathy is a great moral shortcoming for Garrison—will “hasten the resurrection of the dead” (Paragraph 6). In other words, the evil of slavery will accelerate the arrival of Judgement Day, when God will send the dead to their final destinations in Heaven or Hell.
Garrison goes on to quote from the Book of Proverbs when he cites “the fear of man that bringeth a snare” (Proverbs 29:25), which suggests that his courage to advocate for abolition is supported by God; the full proverb reads: “The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in the LORD shall be safe.” Slavery was violently contested in 1831, and many people who were opposed to it feared speaking out against it. Garrison assures his readers that their cause is righteous and that God will protect them.
Garrison begins with the idea that the United States, while a single country, contains a variety of subcultures that are often shaped by geography. Citizens might show more allegiance to the ideas of their region than to those of other regions.
In the first paragraph of “To the Public,” Garrison mentions that some of his earlier writings had been “hailed in different sections of the country,” making explicit the idea that North, South, East, and West have cultural and value differences that influence whether the audience favorably receives his arguments. Garrison amplifies the significance of sectionalism in the second paragraph when he distinguishes New England from the South. The sectional differences are so great that he fears anti-slavery rhetoric will, at a minimum, be ignored in the South, while there is a chance of it finding a more receptive audience in Boston. This is not hyperbolic speculation. The state of Georgia issued a $5,000 bounty on his head (over $150,000 today). He goes on to make sectional distinctions between “Southern oppressors” and “Northern apologists,” showing that while slavery may be a national problem, the degrees of investment in continuing slavery are distinctly regional.
Garrison also notes that he initially wished to publish The Liberator in Washington, DC. The nation’s capital came into existence as a compromise between the sectional interests of the North and South. Both regions wanted the capital. Washington was created where no city existed before, located between North and South. This sectional compromise created more problems than it solved for abolitionists, however. The slave trade flourished in Washington, DC until 1862, a year into the Civil War. Northern abolitionists frequently used the symbolic imagery of slaves working and being sold in the shadows of government buildings to emphasize the immorality and injustice of a government nominally dedicated to preserving liberty and equality.
English Philosopher John Locke wrote about “natural rights,” by which he meant rights that are given by God. This idea finds its strongest restatement in the American Declaration of Independence: “All men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.” Garrison leans heavily on this concept and uses it as a bridge between the secular and sacred in “To the Public.”
In Locke’s theory, natural rights do not depend on the laws or customs of any government. It follows that enslaved people have natural rights that should be respected. Slavery deprives enslaved people of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. Because these rights are absolute, Garrison argues that emancipation cannot be delayed or denied. To curtail the enslaved person’s natural rights is both a violation of the secular founding principles of the United States and an affront to God.
By invoking the Declaration of Independence, Garrison puts abolitionists on the side of the principles of the United States. He amplifies his belief in natural rights in the sixth paragraph when he argues against moderation. The examples he gives—a home on fire, a spouse under attack, a child in danger—not only point out the reactions that a person might have to dangerous situations, but they also imply that everyone has the right and responsibility to take extreme actions to respond to extreme violations of natural rights. Half measures would be foolish, unjust, and inhumane. Garrison’s language is an emotional plea on behalf of a logical argument; universal and God-given rights must not be denied on the basis of color and custom.