52 pages • 1 hour read
Anton ChekhovA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Anton Chekhov was born to a poor family in a small coastal Russian town and was one of six children. His loving mother and abusive father owned a struggling grocery store, and after the business failed, they moved the family to Moscow; Chekhov, who was 16 at the time, remained in their small town for two more years to complete his schooling. Chekhov rejoined his family in Moscow in 1879 and began his studies at the Moscow University Medical School. However, his father’s financial prowess was no more adept in Moscow, and Chekhov began to use writing as a side job to make money for his family. He wrote short comic pieces examining life in Russia and published them in magazines, often using a pen name. During his years in medical school, Chekhov published hundreds of short stories and gained notoriety as a popular writer. He graduated in 1884 and began practicing medicine. In the same year, he started to cough up blood: a telltale sign of the tuberculosis that would ultimately kill him. Although he saw his brother die of tuberculosis, Chekhov denied the obvious diagnosis and refused to see a doctor for his own illness until 1897.
In 1890, Chekhov traveled to Sakhalin, where a penal colony was situated on a frozen island on the eastern edge of Russia. In his capacity as a physician, Chekhov collected data about the terrible, inhumane conditions and the toll they took on the prisoners’ health. His work led to a broader investigation into the treatment of inmates. In 1891, Chekhov started his own medical clinic, where he offered affordable—and sometimes free—treatment and medication to those who needed it. Even as Chekhov was building his medical career, he also continued to write, publishing under his own name and beginning to produce more serious and substantial works. In a letter to a friend, Chekhov once quipped, “Medicine is my lawful wife, and literature is my mistress. When I get fed up with one, I spend the night with the other. Though it is irregular, it is less boring this way, and besides, neither of them loses anything through my infidelity” (Schwartz, Robert S. “‘Medicine Is My Lawful Wife’—Anton Chekhov, 1860-1904.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 3, 2004). When Moscow’s Korsh Theatre commissioned him to write a comedy as his first play, he instead wrote Ivanov (1887), a drama. The first production was a failure, but after heavy revisions, it was successfully produced in St. Petersburg.
His next play, The Seagull (1896), also opened in St. Petersburg, where it was such a spectacular and legendary flop that Chekhov decided to give up on writing for the theater altogether. However, his friend, Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko, saw the play’s merit and persuaded Chekhov to allow The Seagull to be revived in 1898 at the Moscow Art Theatre (MAT), which he recently founded with Konstantin Stanislavski. The play was a hit and was followed by Uncle Vanya (1899).
Chekhov’s next play, Three Sisters (1901), was commissioned and staged by the MAT. He wrote his final play, The Cherry Orchard (1904), for the MAT as well, but his partnership with the theater was unfortunately short-lived, as Chekhov died of tuberculosis later the same year at the age of 44. Chekov’s childhood poverty sheds some light on his depiction of the crumbling aristocracy, which is a common theme in his writing and is a prominent aspect of Three Sisters. Similarly, Chebutykin, one of multiple doctor characters in Chekhov’s work, is designed to reflect the playwright’s own experience as a practicing physician. It is also important to note that Chekhov’s plays are still often incorrectly interpreted as unalloyed tragedies. In reality, his works blend comedy with tragedy in an attempt to elicit both laughter and tears from the audience. His dialogue also relies heavily on subtext and psychological realism. As he asserted, “Let the things that happen onstage be just as complex and yet just as simple as they are in life. For instance, people are having a meal, just having a meal, but at the same time, their happiness is being created or their lives are being smashed up” (Chekhov, Anton. The Major Plays. Penguin, 2006).
Around the turn of the 20th century, the rapid process of industrialization was quickly changing the shape and structure of the social order. Along with technological advances came mechanized labor, the gathering of the working class in newly forming urban centers, and a pervading sense of alienation from the natural world. In Russia, there was growing upheaval under Tsar Nicholas II, who would become the last of the Romanov dynasty and Russia’s final tsar. The extremely strict structure of class hierarchies under an autocratic monarch—a government that is led by a single leader with absolute power—was oppressive to those in the lower classes. Even with legal changes that weakened some of these hierarchies, the lower classes were still living in poverty, and there was little practical change in the everyday aspects of Russian lives. Conditions were poor in Russia, particularly for the working class and the growing urban middle class that migrated to cities in search of jobs such as factory work. During Chekhov’s lifetime, any attempts at resistance by those who were pushing for a more leftist or democratic Russia were quickly suppressed by the tsar, and political parties were illegal in Russia until 1905, the year after Chekhov’s death. The increasing unrest among the lower classes ultimately led to the start of the Russian Revolution in 1917, in which Tsar Nicholas II abdicated the throne but was ultimately executed in 1918 along with his entire family, ending the Romanov line. Despite this eventuality, it is important to remember that Chekov’s frame of reference ended in 1904, long before these events took place.
As these changes occurred in Russia, there was a seismic shift in the general perspective on the nature of truth, life, and the human experience, and this shift is reflected in art. While artists have always sought to uncover or approach some understanding of truth through a variety of styles and methods, modernists began seeing morality as relative rather than absolute. Accordingly, artists during this time frame began to invent new, ideology-based methods of representing each subject. These various movements—which included realism, naturalism, symbolism, expressionism, dadaism, futurism, and many more—made up the avant-garde and often began with manifestos about what art should be and why. These manifestos dictated the styles and conventions of the art that was produced by members of each movement.
Before the rise of modernism, the dominant artistic style in Russia and across the western world was Romanticism, which rejected the rules of neoclassicism, venerated nature in the face of the industrial revolution, and tended to present heightened drama and idealized representation. The first avant-garde movement was realism, which began in France. Realist playwrights staged real, present social issues within a well-made play structure that follows an Aristotelian pyramid shape, and they also used a burgeoning interest in psychology to create psychologically realistic characters. The idea of unspoken subtext in theater was a new idea. By contrast, naturalism abandoned the manipulated narrative structure and instead attempted to approach truth by presenting an imitation of real life onstage.
In Russia, theaters were monopolized by the government until 1882. In other words, they were tightly controlled and under strict censorship. When the monopoly was abolished, theaters began to crop up around the newly forming urban centers, and most of them focused on producing melodramas. However, two theater-makers, Konstantin Stanislavski and Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko, came together with the goal of building a theater to produce works of realism and naturalism. While the idea of naturalistic staging and psychological realism in acting are commonplace today and are even considered old-fashioned, these two movements were radical at the turn of the 20th century. Stanislavski, who is now one of the most famous theater practitioners in history, wanted to revolutionize actor training. He is now associated with the Stanislavski system of method acting, which is something of a misnomer, as Stanislavski himself never solidified a singular method. Instead, he wrote about his various experiments in eliciting real emotions in actors by teaching them how to connect to their characters. The two men opened their theater in 1898, and their first few productions were successful. However, later in their first season, they remounted Chekhov’s ostensibly career-ending failure, The Seagull, and their production was such a success that it brought new attention to the Moscow Art Theatre. In fact, the theater soon adopted an outline of a seagull as its symbol. After Chekhov’s death, the Moscow Art Theatre continued to evolve and still exists today.
By Anton Chekhov