logo

62 pages 2 hours read

Anthony Horowitz

The Word is Murder

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Genre Context: The Mystery Genre

Broadly defined, the mystery genre encompasses a plot dedicated to the solving of a crime—often, though not always, a murder. The crime may be solved by a member of the police, someone adjacent to the criminal investigation, or an amateur. Horowitz is clearly indebted to the traditions of the 1930s Golden Age of Detective Fiction, pioneered by Agatha Christie, Ngaio Marsh, Josephine Tey, and others, beyond his stated interest in Sherlock Holmes, one of the Victorian era’s most notable fictional detectives. In these novels, the central crime can be solved by the reader through clues and evidence left in the narrative, though the detective frequently sums up the case for an audience in the conclusion—a convention that disconcerts Hawthorne.

In his first chapter, Horowitz leaves clues he does not fully explicate. He intentionally cites and describes the quotation from Hamlet above the funeral parlor while offering no indication that the play is key to the identity of the killer (4). Throughout the work, Horowitz as author has Anthony the character record details without noting their significance or context, such as the thematic resonance of Diana Cowper’s funeral program or Robert Cornwallis’s full name seen on his Undertaker of the Year award (52).

Hawthorne’s insistence that only the murder is significant, not the identity or personal life of the detective, is, in some ways, a defense of the genre’s history: Sherlock Holmes is not altered emotionally or personally by the vast majority of his cases. The same is essentially true for his Golden Age successors Hercule Poirot, Roderick Alleyn, and Miss Marple. Anthony is familiar with Hawthorne’s traditional attitude, having written several of the scripts for Poirot television adaptations. His novels Magpie Murders and Moonflower Murders also engage directly with the Golden Age mystery’s forms and tropes. Hawthorne’s monologue in the penultimate chapter, explaining his thought process and the solution to the case, is characteristic of the Golden Age novel’s structure.

Anthony’s insistence that the detective’s inner life is important to readers reflects changes in the genre later in the 20th century, where readers follow a detective and their personal lives throughout a series. This change notably emerged in the work of P. D. James, whose Adam Dalgliesh goes from a solitary life to a new relationship, and in the works of Deborah Crombie and Louise Penny, whose detectives all undergo personal and professional crises as they solve cases. Though Anthony’s quest to comprehend Hawthorne is incomplete, the reader does get significant glimpses into Anthony’s inner life, his doubts, and the sense that the Cowper investigation has changed him and his understanding of crime. This, too, is a departure from the Golden Age convention, where the less-skilled investigative partner is often a less complex character dominated by their loyalty and admiration of the detective. Anthony’s prickly relationship with Hawthorne and established skills of his own counter this trope, adding complexity to the text.

Series Context: Hawthorne & Horowitz

The Word Is Murder is the first novel in the Hawthorne & Horowitz series, which pairs a fictionalized version of real-life author and television writer Anthony Horowitz with his own fictional creation, Detective Daniel Hawthorne. The work thus assumes no prior knowledge of the characters or their work: Anthony describes much of his television and literary résumé, from Midsomer Murders to Foyle’s War. He details his personal history with Hawthorne and admiration of his reasoning skills, if not his personality or character.

Horowitz uses the metaliterary aspects of the text to cast doubt on the future of the series at some stages of the narrative, while ultimately assuring the reader of its future. When he learns that Hawthorne is intolerant toward gay people, he admits, “I realized that I could be in terrible trouble. What about the critics? They would tear the book apart” (69). Anthony subsequently doubts the wisdom of moving forward with the entire project but is drawn back in by his sense of duty to Diana Cowper and his interest in the solution to the case. His conversation with his agent underlines the precocity of his new effort, since she is dismayed he is working on a book that is not under contract with committed interest from a publisher.

As the work closes, Anthony is so incensed with Hawthorne that he is prepared to abandon the entire project. The reader never learns, however, what he does next, only that he “[knows] exactly what [he is] going to do” (275). This effectively sets up future installments, though the fate of the investigative partnership is left in limbo.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text