logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Joan Didion

The White Album

Nonfiction | Essay Collection | Adult | Published in 1979

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “Women”

“The Women’s Movement” Summary

Didion sees the revolutionary power of feminism as contrived and views the women’s movement as vacuous. She blames followers of Karl Marx—a 19th-century political philosopher who promoted the overthrow of capitalism—for trying to turn marginalized classes into revolutionaries. Didion claims most marginalized people care about practical issues and gaining access to what the majority has. She accuses feminists of turning women into a class and forcing a consciousness on them that reduces them to “victims.” Didion doesn’t think the world has clear victims and predators, and she doesn’t view marriage, cooking, or raising children as automatically oppressive. Makeup advertisements and eating alone don’t bother Didion, and she doesn’t feel constantly raped.

Didion admits that sexism harms some women but she notes that others get along fine. Didion believes no one can force a woman to conform to sexist norms, so what feminists are upset about is that their lives haven’t met their expectations. She sees the women of the feminist movement as children who don’t want to face the murky and harsh reality of the adult world. They continue to crave unrealizable fun and romance. Didion believes the women’s movement isn’t a tangible cause for women but a symptom of their immature fantasies.

“Doris Lessing” Summary

Didion applauds the emotional energy of Doris Lessing’s books but doesn’t think much of Briefing for a Descent into Hell (1971), in which Charles Watkins, a classics professor at Cambridge, winds up in a psychiatric hospital. Didion describes Watkins’s nonsensical idea of reality as ordinary. Most people understand life’s hecticness. In another Lessing novel, The Golden Notebook (1962), Didion spots a connection to the feminist movement: Women characters are upset that the world doesn’t adhere to their ideals.

Didion delves into Lessing’s background. She grew up in British Africa and was keenly aware of colonization, classism, and sexism. Didion sees Lessing’s work as a quest for solutions to world problems and admires her search for potential fixes.

“Georgia O’Keeffe” Summary

Didion and her daughter are at the Chicago Art Institute. It’s 1973, so her daughter is seven. She sees Georgia O’Keeffe’s Sky Above Clouds (1965) and tells her mom that she needs to talk to O’Keeffe. Didion notes that her daughter connects the painting’s glory to its maker. Her daughter links the art to the artist, and Didion sees the forcefulness or “hardness” of O’Keeffe’s work in O’Keeffe. She describes O’Keeffe as a tough, honest woman receptive to the world around her. Men’s opinions don’t faze O’Keeffe. Men said it was impossible to paint New York and that O’Keeffe shouldn’t use such bright colors, so O’Keeffe painted New York and used brighter colors. Throughout school, she endured criticism and sexism, but her acute sense of self kept her independent. When O’Keeffe was 24, she went to Texas with her sister, where she could focus on nature. From one star in Texas, she made 10 watercolor paintings.

Part 3 Analysis

Didion uses an ironic and derisive tone to convey her contempt for feminism. She includes scare quotes to mock their claims and terminology. Thus, oppressed turns into “oppressed,” class becomes “class,” and idea is “idea” (96). Didion doesn’t believe society oppresses all women, and she doesn’t think of women as a revolutionary class. As for ideas, Didion uses hyperbole or exaggerated language to articulate what she considers feminism’s absence of consequential ideas. She calls it “a yearning absolutely devoid of ideas” (96).

Didion’s disdain for feminism is explicit, and her rejection of the women’s movement relates to the themes of Storytelling and The Construction and Subversion of Identity. The feminist literature Didion cites creates an identity for women—they’re “everyone’s victim but her own” (101). The story the feminists tell about themselves reinforces their perceived status as oppressed. The hypothetical woman must cook and raise children. She’s routinely raped, brainwashed by the makeup industry, and ashamed to eat alone. Didion sets hyperbole aside and concedes that “many women are victims of condescension and exploitation and sex-role stereotyping,” adding that “other women are not: nobody forces women to buy the package” (102).

Presumably, Didion identifies with the other women. She doesn’t buy the package and doesn’t create a story or identity for herself that links to oppression. Didion defines womanhood as mysterious—“that sense of living one’s deepest life underwater, that dark involvement with blood and birth and death” (103). Her idea of womanhood links to motifs of violence and pain. Meanwhile, feminists portray women as “too ‘sensitive’ for the difficulties of adult life [and] unequipped for reality” (102). They can’t confront the truth of birth, blood, and death. They’re stuck in “perpetual adolescents” (103), where they dream of “Eternal love, romance, fun. The Big Apple” (104). Didion creates a juxtaposition. She pits feminists against adults to spotlight how the former lack maturity.

The essay ends with the witty and ironic statement, “[T]he movement is no longer a cause but a symptom” (104). Didion plays with the terms “symptom” and “cause.

 The women’s movement isn’t a cause by her definition: It doesn’t help women achieve a tangible goal. Instead, it’s a symptom—an indication that these women don’t want to face the complexities and disappointments that compose adult life regardless of gender. Didion sees it as a copout and portrays the feminist authors as “women scarred not by their class position as women but by the failure of their childhood expectations and misapprehensions” (103). To Didion, the women’s movement isn’t fighting oppression but constructing an infantile fantasy. Her harsh, punchy tone reveals her deep scorn for sophomoric feminism.

Didion links Doris Lessing to the women’s movement. She sees Lessing as “assaulted at every turn by fresh evidence that the world is not exactly improving as promised” (108). However, Didion’s tone is softer in this essay. She doesn’t agree with Lessing’s drive to find solutions or create narratives but admits that “there is something finally very moving about her tenacity” (111). With Lessing, Didion reveals she can disagree with someone but still admire their drive to produce. Lessing created a prodigious amount of literature, and her work ethic earns Didion’s esteem.

The O’Keeffe essay reveals the personal side of Didion. She and her daughter examine an O’Keeffe painting at a museum. Her daughter asks, “Who drew it?” Didion tells her, and her daughter says, “I need to talk to her” (112). The exchange links to one of the book’s main themes: The Construction and Subversion of Identity. The daughter creates an identity for O’Keeffe based on the painting: The work is amazing, so O’Keeffe must be too. Didion portrays O’Keeffe as admirable. The scorching diction she uses for the feminists is absent. She doesn’t mention feminism in the essay, but it’s as if Didion implicitly juxtaposes O’Keeffe with the women’s movement. O’Keeffe faces sexism and criticism in school and from male artists but doesn’t “buy the package” (102). Didion notes, “She is simply hard, a straight shooter, a woman clean of received wisdom and open to what she sees” (113). Didion’s laudatory tone turns O’Keeffe into an icon. She’s an honest woman worthy of emulation. What other people do and say doesn’t bother her. She paints what she wants and lives where she likes. Her story and identity center on toughness and independence. She’s an adult.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text