logo

61 pages 2 hours read

Milan Kundera

The Unbearable Lightness of Being

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1984

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “Words Misunderstood”

Part 3, Chapters 1-2 Summary

In Geneva, Franz finishes his lecture and leaves the university to meet his mistress, a painter. Because he does not make a habit of spending portions of the same day in the beds of two different women, their visit will be purely social. He often takes her with him when he attends lectures, conferences, and symposia in foreign cities, but the two are never physically intimate in Geneva. On this day, he asks his mistress to accompany him to Palermo. She refuses, and he worries that it is a signal of her cooling desire for him, but this is not the case. At her apartment, she removes her clothing and stands before her mirror in her undergarments and a bowler hat. Although initially aroused, he grows uncomfortable and is unsure what to make of her performance. He nervously asks her once again to accompany him to Palermo, and this time she agrees.

When Franz leaves, Sabina contemplates her bowler hat. She remembers the first time it became part of her erotic friendship with Tomáš. Spying it in her flat, he placed it on her head. The two initially found it comic, but they soon became aroused by its incongruity with the rest of her nearly naked body. That hat had belonged to her grandfather, the mayor of a small Bohemian town, and she had inherited it upon her father’s death. It connects her to her familial past and, now that she has emigrated, it connects her to her recent past in Prague with Tomáš as well. When she wears it for him in Geneva, they are reminded not of what it once meant to them, but of the history of their relationship. The hat’s meaning has shifted over time and continues to shift. It is a motif that grows and morphs along with her: This is why Franz found it puzzling. The two do not possess the kind of shared history that she and Tomáš share.

Part 3, Chapter 3 Summary

This chapter is a “short dictionary of misunderstood words” between Sabina and Franz (89). Sabina realizes that she and Franz have wildly different definitions for common and (she thinks) easily understood terms. She views “woman” simply as one of the two sexes. To Franz, a “true” woman is the platonic ideal of woman, which he bases on his mother rather than his wife. Their definitions of fidelity and betrayal also differ. Franz, because he views fidelity to his mother, even after her death, as the highest form of love, sees betrayal as particularly vile. For Sabina, betrayal signifies “going off into the unknown,” which is, for her, the most magnificent part of life (91). She recalls her early love for cubism and her father’s disdain for it. Leaving home to attend art school in Prague was both a betrayal of her father’s values and the best decision she had ever made. There, where students were forced to paint according to the communist party-approved style of social realism, her affinity for cubism was another kind of exciting betrayal. She married and then divorced a man whose presence had become tiresome to her, and that betrayal she also found liberating. Music is another area of profound difference for the two: Having lived his life dedicated to words, language, and writing, he loves to get lost in the Dionysian thrill of music. For Sabina, music is little more than noise. Franz feels similarly about the dichotomy between light and darkness: For him darkness is preferable because he can get lost in it. For Sabina, an artist, light is sublime.

Part 3, Chapter 4 Summary

In Geneva, Sabina attempts to forge friendships among the group of Czech émigrés who have resettled there. They endlessly rehash the Russian invasion of Czechoslovakia and the country’s communist history. Sabina does not share their opinions and feels markedly out of place in their company. They dismiss her art as unimportant and look down on her for not having fought against communism more actively. She does not see in them any real understanding of the ideology of the dissident movement and thinks that they are attracted only to the glory of men like Jan Hus, a dissident who self-immolated in protest of the Czech government.

Part 3, Chapter 5 Summary

This chapter continues the dictionary of misunderstood words. Sabina detests parades because they remind her of communist pageantry, particularly the May Day parades she was forced to perform in as a girl. Franz adores parades because they remind him of his days in Paris and recall for him the idea of history’s “Grand March” and the grandeur of Europe itself.

Part 3, Chapter 6 Summary

Sabina attends a reception given by Franz’s wife, Marie-Claude, who does not know that Sabina and Franz are lovers. Franz observes his wife and daughter socializing and sees them in an unflattering light. Marie-Claude makes a spectacle out of criticizing a necklace Sabina is wearing, and Franz realizes that this is because Sabina’s most recent show met mixed reviews and Marie-Claude wants to let Sabina (and everyone else in the room) know that there is a power imbalance between the two: As a well-regarded patroness of the arts, Marie-Claude has more social capital than Sabina.

Part 3, Chapter 7 Summary

This chapter concludes the short dictionary of misunderstood words between Sabina and Franz. Sabina continues to realize that she and Franz see the world in fundamentally dissimilar ways, and this extends to the beauty of religious buildings, individual characteristics like strength, and even the meaning of “living in truth” (112). For Sabina, accustomed to life under communist rule, it was not possible to “live in truth” in public, because individuals are always being surveilled by the state. Anyone who knows they are being watched at all times ceases to act authentically. Franz, himself the product of a capitalist state, does not see privacy through that lens.

He decides to tell Marie-Claude about his affair with Sabina. After he shares the story of his affair with her, he feels “lighter and lighter” (114). He is at last living in truth.

Part 3, Chapters 8-11 Summary

Although she does not share this with Franz, Sabina is chagrined that Marie-Claude knows of their affair. She assumes that he will want to marry her now, and that is not at all what she has in mind for their future. In fact, she is going to leave him. She admits that he is one of the best men she’s ever known, and yet she finds him distasteful.

Marie-Claude reacts to the dissolution of her marriage in a way that Franz, used to seeing her as a weak woman not unlike his own mother, finds puzzling. She tells him that she expects him to move in with Sabina. He heads to Sabina’s flat but finds that she has moved out. With no other options, he rents himself a new flat. One day, he sees his wife through the window of a café. She is happy, laughing, and animated, and he thinks she looks years younger. Back at his flat, his new desk arrives and he is pleased with it. He finds that he too is happier to be single. He radiates such a feeling of well-being that one of his students promptly falls in love with him. Marie-Claude, Franz, and Sabina are all much better off apart than they were together.

Sabina moves from Geneva to Paris, where in spite of how light she feels after ridding herself of Franz, she is lonely. Tomáš’s son writes to her that Tomáš and Tereza have recently died. They were living in the countryside on a collective farm, and the pickup that they were driving crashed due to faulty brakes.

Part 3 Analysis

This portion of the text focuses on Sabina. It describes her life in exile and provides the reader with additional detail about her past as a young artist in Prague.

Much of Sabina’s characterization in this section happens through the contrast evident between her personality and that of her Swiss lover Franz. Sabina, like Tomáš, occupies a surprisingly ambivalent position in relation to the dichotomy of Lightness and Weight. She prefers the inherent lightness of sexual relationships that lack emotional connectivity and long-term commitment, and yet, like Tomáš, she is drawn to partners who embody the opposite: At least from Sabina’s perspective, Franz symbolizes weight. His relationship ideal is the polar opposite of Sabina’s, something that becomes obvious to Sabina (although not to Franz) through the extensive glossary she creates of “words misunderstood” between the two of them.

Sabina’s relationship with Franz is shown in stark contrast to her physically passionate but emotionally distant series of liaisons with Tomáš, although in this section of the narrative she and Tomáš do share a moment of uncharacteristic emotional intimacy: After the two immigrate separately to Switzerland, they arrange a rendezvous. Sabina dons the bowler hat that she so often wore during their sexual encounters in the past. They are both touched, in this moment, by what they now see as a symbol of their shared history. In spite of this, the two do not attempt to alter the parameters of their relationship, instead continuing as they have for many years, as lovers who lead their own, independent lives.

This moment of connection over the bowler hat allows Sabina to see her relationship with Franz through a different lens: The bowler hat has meaning for Tomáš and Tereza because they have, in spite of their habit of emotional compartmentalization, a shared history. She and Franz do not have a shared history, and Sabina thinks that this is perhaps the reason that their beliefs, values, and experiences are so ideologically divergent.

Chief among the “words misunderstood” between the two is betrayal—a concept that Franz, following convention, views in entirely negative terms. To Sabina, on the other hand, raised in a communist state which required conformity and obedience from all its citizens all the time, betrayal means “going off into the unknown” (91). It signifies deviation from a stifling norm and the courage to maintain a sense of individual identity in a society that enforces collectivism with the crushing weight of an iron fist.

Franz is drawn to parades, while Sabina cannot stand them. To Franz, they signify the unifying ideology of history’s “Grand March,” a banner of brotherhood that has the power to bring all the peoples of Europe together to work toward equality. Sabina understands the dangers of such ideology. She sees the political left through the lens of its extreme: communism. When Sabina looks at a parade, she sees a large group of people chanting the same not-quite-understood slogans together in an effort to stamp out individualism, critical thinking, and difference. Sabina is a fierce individualist. Franz is not.

Their artistic inclinations are similarly mismatched, for Franz adores music and Sabina hears music as unpleasant background noise. Franz is an intellectual, a university lecturer whose life is devoted to language, rhetoric, and precise communication. For him, music is a Dionysian oasis into which he can retreat from the world of words and experience pure emotion. Sabina, as a visual artist, is much more drawn to light, and even this is a reflection of her intense individualism: Light changes that which it shines upon, and light itself is ever shifting. The way that sunlight hits a tree, person, or painting at seven in the morning is not the way that it hits the same object at noon or at dusk.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text