logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Michael Lewis

The Premonition: A Pandemic Story

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Prioritizing Courage Above Popularity

Decisions such as closing schools, requiring masks, and issuing stay-at-home orders are unpopular. In the case of the COVID pandemic, the risks of such mandates for government officials were high given that so little was known about the virus early in the outbreak. Officials were reluctant to order a lockdown because if the measure proved unhelpful, or if the virus proved less deadly than predicted, the mistaken order would give their opponents ammunition—in effect, it could be political suicide.

The only people willing to act to meet the moment’s urgency—possibly the ones who understand it best—are paradoxically those who are not high-profile politicians and leaders. The reference to the book The Swine Flu Affair attests to the consequences of blowing the whistle if the public interprets it as premature.

Charity Dean exemplifies the bravery of a compassionate and focused expert who cares only about making the decision that causes the least harm overall. She doesn’t prioritize her public image or future job prospects over decisions she considers necessary. By comparison, the Wolverines don’t have to consider public opinion as much because they’re not high enough in the chain of command to worry about their reputations. However, their reports don’t generate the urgency they need.

A misguided incentive structure is another reason that officials postpone or ignore difficult choices. The rise of a “black market” during the pandemic allows unscrupulous people and companies to reap enormous profits. In addition, as the call between the Biohub and Zuckerberg Hospital representatives reveals, the computer system’s structure makes free help impossible for the hospital to accept, as it can’t allow the number zero to be entered as the payment amount for a procedure.

When Ken Cuccinelli contacts Charity Dean, he asks her to do whatever is most effective because he knows that the government won’t. The government is unwilling or unable to admit that its response has led to unnecessary deaths even as the fatality rate rises.

Carter Mecher’s decision-making code is simple: “Play forward whatever you are thinking about doing, or not doing, and ask yourself: Which decision, if you are wrong, will cause you the greatest regret?” (178). This approach allows him to know that even if his decision proves wrong—and especially if it requires indifference to public or political belief—he made it for the right reasons. This decision-making process is unrealistic for people who value their public image more than the loss of life.

The Dangers of Hesitation During a Pandemic

One of the duties of leaders is to make quick decisions that shape or change policy—even in a crisis. In The Premonition, Lewis highlights the disastrous effects of leaders’ hesitation to make such decisions. Leaders—and experts—are the ones that the public defers to. They’re the only ones who can with expediency implement policy changes and mandates for things like masks.

Like Carter Mecher, the other members of the Wolverines make decisions based on what they’ll most regret—and what will cause the most real damage (to citizens)—if they’re wrong. They don’t think in terms of political capital or prioritize public image. Having unselfish motivations frees them to think objectively about problems, without an agenda beyond solving problems and saving lives.

The “wait and see” approach doesn’t work during a pandemic. Carter notes,

You cannot wait for the smoke to clear: once you can see things clearly it is already too late. You can’t outrun an epidemic: by the time you start to run it is already upon you. Identify what is important and drop everything that is not. Figure out the equivalent of an escape fire (172).

In another section, he expands on this idea, saying that people must be able to recognize the smell of smoke; that could prevent more fires than fire extinguishers.

Charity Dean agrees with him in one of her remarks about the CDC: “The CDC does not know how to pull the fire alarm. In fact, there is no fire alarm in this country” (196). If leaders fail to agree on clear warning signals before a pandemic starts, expecting a sense of urgency in the preliminary stages of a spreading disease is naive.

One takeaway from The Premonition is that we’ve already had enough pandemics to learn from. Each one serves as a potential dress rehearsal for something worse. The public record shows that pathogens punish hesitancy and that decisive action can save lives. This principle is clear from the H1N1 pandemic of 1918, the early-2000s SARS outbreak in China, and COVID, among others. The nature of COVID—from the uncertainty about its origin, to the varying intensity of symptoms that people experience, to the virus’s many mutations and variations—produces confusion. A person whose neighborhood, or town, is unscathed during the pandemic may view the global panic as extreme or confusing.

The Inefficiency of the US Government

In the 2019 Nuclear Threat Initiative’s Global Health Security Index, the US ranks first in overall preparedness but last in many metrics for more specific critical preparedness metrics. In The Premonition, once Charity Dean, Carter Mecher, and the others realize that the pandemic is inevitable and won’t go away on its own, they give the government recommendations based on their experience.

Unfortunately, nothing happens fast, and sometimes nothing happens at all. Promising ideas often receive support and then vanish in the bureaucracy. Dean never learns why her ideas about genomic analysis aren’t put into practice despite their obvious efficacy. In Chapter 10, DeRisi’s staff change the Biohub into a testing facility when it becomes clear that the CDC won’t offer immediate solutions: “It had taken Joe’s new team two days less to build an entire lab than it was taking for Quest Diagnostics and Labcorp to process a single test” (247). The government’s slowness is maddening for Carter and the Wolverines, who know that people will die unnecessarily because of the government’s fumbled response.

What makes DeRisi and his staff, the Wolverines, and Dean so much more efficient than the US government is partly that they don’t run for office and aren’t the heads of corporations. The government doesn’t reward efficiency. The need to appease constituencies, prepare for the next election cycle, and keep good relationships with corporations is not conducive to expediency.

Lewis spends Part 1 introducing the major characters and their bodies of work. Dean, Carter, and the others work tirelessly to lay the groundwork for future pandemics. However, no one can find a use for them most of the time. After Carter leaves the White House at the end of the Obama administration, he’s shocked by the ensuing display of inefficiency. Thousands of the files that his team worked on disappeared as if they’d never existed. People at the White House ignore a great deal of foundational work that would be useful as a roadmap for future pandemics. Decision makers and political influencers hesitate to act to avert crisis because they’re less likely to focus on the potential gravity or anecdotal evidence than those who have direct experience with the symptoms or other indicators—and the potential death toll. However, when decision makers hesitate to make necessary policy changes, the tragic cost of that hesitation may be human life.

Like the other Wolverines, Carter’s primary interest is in solving problems. However, he rarely gets the chance to work on problems without first removing obstacles like inefficiency from the equation. The government’s inefficiency often results from indifference or distorted priorities. Other times, it’s purely the result of old technology, like the California state computer system that won’t allow free help because its computers can’t enter zero as the payment for a procedure.

The Positive and Negative Aspects of Experience

Charity Dean, Carter Mecher, and the Wolverines don’t draw their conclusions haphazardly or without due diligence. Carter reflects that, “Experience is making the same mistake over and over again, only with greater confidence” (124). In The Premonition, experience can be helpful or harmful to one’s job, health, decision-making process, and more.

Carter focuses on what he calls “almost mistakes” when trying to create an environment that will minimize errors. By eliminating “almost mistakes,” he reduces the possibility of full-blown ones. However, others draw different conclusions: If something bad almost happens, but then either nothing happens or whatever happens isn’t as bad as people feared, people grow more confident. However, this confidence is misplaced. A thousand near mistakes should prove that a system has flaws that make potential mistakes likely. Conversely, treating near mistakes as proof that there’s nothing to worry about—because nothing came of them—instills the wrong sort of confidence.

Consider Sencer, the subject of the book The Swine Flu Affair. In the 1970s, the vaccines he pushed for and the other measures he took to prevent the swine flu were much like measures taken during the COVID pandemic. He based his decisions on his experience, including careful study of prior pandemics. However, when people died from the vaccine, and when the swine flu vanished on its own, Sencer’s experience didn’t matter. He became an object of ridicule and scorn. The public—and his bosses—didn’t value his experience or reward him for being proactive in trying to save lives, which cost him his reputation and his job.

Carter and the Wolverines embody the proper use of experience. They’re experts in their field, and they achieve results that justify their reputation. Curiosity, commitment, and a genuine concern for public welfare drive them and inform their experience. Conversely, most bureaucrats—and many US citizens—embrace near mistakes as proof that there’s no cause for alarm. Bureaucrats and politicians do this for political expediency and positive optics (public image). Citizens might ignore mandates like wearing masks because they don’t know anyone with COVID, which is anecdotal evidence that falls under Carter’s definition of “almost mistakes.” In The Premonition, ignoring the experts’ advice leads to errors, and in turn, those errors—born of false confidence based on one experience—lead to a passive, reactive government and more deaths.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text