74 pages • 2 hours read
Robert A. CaroA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Arrogance was a fundamental part of Moses’s personality. His addiction to power was becoming another, equally essential part of him. He sought more and more power as “an end in itself” (499). Power allowed him to mock and antagonize others without fear of reprisal. He enjoyed ruining people, threatening people, and ignoring anyone who tried to restrict his actions. He refused to be constrained by objections, courts, judges, or bureaucracy, which he sliced through “as if it were soft butter” (507).
His force of will reshaped New York City, but the distribution of his changes was “not at all even” (509). Of the 255 playgrounds he builds, for example, only one is in Harlem. People in working-class, African American, or Puerto Rican neighborhoods were routinely ignored or even evicted to make way for his parks and highways, which typically only benefitted the city’s white, wealthy citizens. When people raised this subject, he used his influence with the press to shout them down.
Moses loved water and built many swimming pools, but he designed these pools to deter African Americans from using them. He filled the pools with cold water, for example, because he believed that “[African Americans] don’t like cold water” (514). Moses built many roads and bridges to reduce congestion in the city, but often, these developments resulted in even greater traffic jams. Moses’s solution to this congestion was building even more roads and bridges. He disliked mass transit and refused to even consider building subways, trains, or bus routes. His drive to build more roads and more bridges often destroyed neighborhoods and communities. Even if the neighborhood itself remained, he could destroy it by building overpasses that transformed bright and bustling neighborhoods into seedy and undesirable places, forcing people to flee to other parts of the city.
In his quest to build a road along Manhattan, he mounted a monumental effort to obliterate the bureaucratic problems that stood in his way. He settled a railroad’s debt using elaborate financial mechanisms, scrutinized the law for every possible loophole, and cajoled bankers and politicians into giving him funds for dubious reasons. Bill Exton and Bob Weinberg tried to stop Moses from building his West Side Improvement project, as it would destroy “the only real woodland left on Manhattan” (541). They proposed a viable alternative route that was less expensive and more beneficial than Moses’s plan. He refused to entertain any criticism, however, and began cutting down trees as they tried to hold public hearings on the matter. As was his method, he began work on the project before anyone could object, and no one dared risk stopping a project that was already underway. Moses won his battle and built the West Side Improvement, to public acclaim, though the costs were way above his estimates and the traffic in the city became worse than ever.
The park that he built as part of the development was specifically targeted in such a way that the “Harlem section” (558), the part nearest to African American communities, was inaccessible, underfunded, and deliberately underdeveloped. Caro calls the project “a monument to a city’s indifference to the needs of its poorest people” (559). When Moses did build a playground in Harlem, it was “decorated with monkeys” (560). Moses destroyed the city’s last natural spaces to build roads for motorists at the expense of poor, nonwhite people and anyone who did not drive. The wealthy elite of the city, however, loved and celebrated his works. He became a national figure, and the media praised his projects without scrutinizing his methods. He was celebrated for his ability to “Get Things Done” (571). Engineers and city planners from all over the world visited Moses to learn his secrets, and he basked in their adoration.
Moses still found time to visit Al Smith, who had become “a sad and bitter man” (573). Though Smith, humiliated and alone, warned Moses not to presume that his public support would endure forever, Moses believed that it would.
Moses had an estranged brother named Paul. Robert Caro interviews Paul to discern the nature of the estrangement. Moses cut Paul out of their mother’s will, ensuring that Paul would only receive a small sum each year at Moses’s discretion. The two brothers were very similar, both possessing the same “Moses charm” (577). Unlike Moses, however, Paul defied their mother and clung to his idealism. Whereas Moses looked down on those he considered beneath him, Paul was stridently egalitarian. He was very intelligent and studied electrical engineering, refusing to follow the career path his mother had laid out for him. When he tried to find civic jobs, however, he discovered that he was blacklisted. He suspected that his brother was responsible for this.
Paul was often desperate for money but too proud to beg for help from his brother. He resented Moses for the change in their mother’s will, which left Paul with practically nothing. In middle age, he found himself trapped in a “net of debts” (588) and he often goes without food. He felt as though he was the “victim of a monstrous injustice” perpetrated by his brother (593). Paul struggled for years, working dead-end jobs and living in squalid conditions. He retained his “remarkable intellect” (597) but could not find work as an electrical engineer. He blamed Moses. Finally, when Paul was struggling at age 75, Moses intervened and found him a small position as “little more than an errand boy” (598). Paul, desperate and sick, was forced to swallow his pride.
Moses’s attitude toward his brother was demonstrative of his attitude toward much of his family. He avoided them at all costs. Even his beloved wife, Mary Moses, was gradually alienated by him. Over his decades in power, Moses had many affairs outside his marriage. As “he grew louder, [Mary] grew quieter” (603). She never tolerated any criticism from her husband, though she began spending more and more time alone at home. She aged quickly and developed an alcohol addiction. In her old age, she was hospitalized numerous times for “nervous trouble” (606).
Caro notes that Moses became increasingly susceptible to “the addiction of power” (607). The creation of the New York City Tunnel Authority shows this. The authority was created by La Guardia, and Moses demanded that he be placed in charge. When La Guardia refused, Moses tried to “destroy” the rival authority. He was foiled, ultimately, but still craved more power. He saw an opportunity in the Wagner-Steagall Act, which provided funds for urban renewal and slum removal. Moses did not care about poor people, but he recognized the potential of such funds to reshape the city in his image. La Guardia, realizing that he was in a power struggle, employed devious techniques to prevent Moses from wrestling away control of the project for himself. He kept Moses’s power limited to within his “traditional spheres” and began to worry about how much power Moses had, even within these spheres.
Public authorities such as the Port Authority typically exist to accomplish a single, distinct project and then are dissolved. Moses recognized that such authorities have powers more like a private corporation than a government. Since authorities are created using bonds, Moses realized that the person in charge of the authorities could raise and use a vast amount of money so long as the bonds were never repaid in full. A public authority that sold bonds based on earnings from future bridge tolls, for example, would typically be dissolved once those bonds were repaid (with interest) from the toll earnings. If Moses simply reinvested this money, however, he could maintain the authority’s power over several projects and raise vast sums while being immune from public scrutiny. Since Moses was interested in building public works, the authorities made it so that “the more public works he built, the more money he would have to build still more public works” (619). The authority would give him money and power while insulating him from accountability. He could spend this money as he saw fit, not limited by the mayor or the governor. He wrote a law so that the only people who could challenge the power of the authority would be the bondholder or the bond provider, meaning either himself (as the head of the authority) or the bank (which would never challenge him). By changing the law, he gave himself “the powers of a sovereign state” (623).
He introduced legislation to make himself the head of the Triborough Bridge Authority and told no one about the subtle changes in the law, which turned this into one of the most powerful positions in the United States. He was no longer beholden to the authorities; they were beholden to him. He no longer needed public support, as there was no legal way to remove him from his position. Since his public image was that of “the man who Got Things Done” (633), however, no one thought to question his position until he already attained his power. He began to build an empire, and when La Guardia tried to check his power, he told the mayor to “read the agreements and contracts” (635). After this, Moses no longer needed to treat La Guardia as “his superior but as an equal” (636).
Moses’s love of water endured throughout his life, something Caro discusses to add nuance and humanity to his subject. Even as he dedicated extensive time to his work, he still found time to swim. He loved beaches and boats because they brought him near the water, and his sincere, genuine affection for water fueled many of his most impressive projects. His work on the beaches of Long Island, for example, was motivated by his bond with the water and his love of swimming. This affection for the water becomes a through line of both Moses’s life and The Power Broker and adds a touch of sincerity to certain projects. This is missing from others; for example, Moses hated tunnels because they go beneath the water. Bridges, by contrast, span rivers and other bodies of water, allowing for connection. Moses’s love of water informed his choice of projects, and in the same way that New York was shaped around his biases, it was also shaped around his aesthetic preference for water.
Alongside water, Caro explores other influences on Moses in Part 5 (or people who were shaped by him). He dedicates a chapter to the significant people in Moses’s life who, for one reason or another, were forced into the shadow of his central character. Paul Moses creates an illustrative tale of what Moses’s life might have become. Sharing his brother’s genius and his arrogance, Paul differed from Moses in that he refused to limit himself around his mother. He challenged her opinions while Moses ceded to her judgment. The result was that Moses was supported by her throughout his life, while Paul struggled alone. Once their mother died, Moses inherited not just her estate but her pettiness. He used his power to keep Paul out of lucrative public jobs, imposing poverty on his brother almost as though he were punishing him for disobeying their mother. Paul, unable to channel his arrogance and genius in the same manner as his brother, creates a dramatic counterpoint to the life of Moses. His struggle illustrates what Moses’s life might have been like if he had not found outlets for his ambitions and ways to satisfy his lust for power. At the end of his life, Paul was finally supported (in the most minimal way) by Moses. This patronization was a final blow, a way for Moses to assert dominance over the one person who resembled him the most.
While he allowed his brother to fester in poverty, Moses reveled in his reputation for Getting Things Done. His capacity to use a machete to cut through red tape, impose his will on the city, and build the unbuildable became the most dominant aspect of his public reputation. When people thought of Moses, they thought of the only man able to build huge infrastructure projects. People came from across America and the rest of the world to learn his secrets, while mayors and governors relied on him to build the large projects that were essential to their election campaigns. With this, his work contributed to Corruption in New York City Politics. “Getting Things Done” was the Moses trademark, a business card that contained the justification for his brashness, arrogance, secrecy, and—at times—his criminality. It was also a tautology—a type of repetitive, circular logic in which building became a justification for more building, however, Moses felt like doing it. This came at the expense of poor people and people of color, who were displaced to accommodate Moses’s ego. He and he alone could get things done, and in his quest for even greater power, he accepted even higher costs.
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Jewish American Literature
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Pulitzer Prize Fiction Awardees &...
View Collection