logo

67 pages 2 hours read

Dan Jones

The Plantagenets: The Warrior Kings and Queens Who Made England

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2012

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 5: “Age of Violence (1307-1330)

Part 5, Chapter 1 Summary: “The King and his Brother”

Edward II was considered ill-suited to kingship, favoring frivolous pursuits over serious leadership and prone to destructive favoritism. In particular, he had an intensely personal relationship with Gaveston, promoting him to enormous status and power, to the expected candidates’ shock.

Part 5, Chapter 2 Summary: “Coronation”

At Edward’s coronation (1308), his oaths included acknowledgment of the growing role of the political community, but he also centered Gaveston inappropriately. Armed insurrection loomed. The barons demanded Gaveston’s exile and an acknowledgment of separation between the king’s person and his office.

Part 5, Chapter 3 Summary: “Emergency”

In 1309, Edward offered a reform program to sweeten Gaveston’s return. Gaveston’s presence and behavior rankled the barons. Financial demands were not matched by results in Scotland. Edward was accused of impoverishing the Crown and burdening the people, eroding the Magna Carta. A parliament demanded the creation of a reforming panel, the Ordainers.

Part 5, Chapter 4 Summary: “The Ordinances”

In 1310, Edward and Gaveston failed to make progress in Scotland. English power balances shifted as the already powerful Lancaster inherited two more Earldoms. In 1311, the Ordinances were published. Reforms included further separating the king’s personal and official capacities, and embedding parliament’s rights and roles. They also banished Gaveston again. However, later, more stringent Ordinances provoked Edward’s furious recall of Gaveston and denunciation of the Ordinances altogether.

Part 5, Chapter 5 Summary: “Manhunt”

English magnates cooperated to capture Gaveston in 1312. His initial captor promised his safety, but another group (led by Lancaster) kidnapped him and killed him following a show trial. This flouted the rule of law, which governed throughout Plantagenet’s reigns. It divided the magnates between those involved, now definitely enemies of Edward, and others who felt betrayed by this violence and shifted allegiance towards Edward.

Part 5, Chapter 6 Summary: “Summer of Promise”

Edward was persuaded not to initiate civil war because it would facilitate Scottish encroachments. In 1312, his wife, Isabella, gave birth to an heir, also named Edward. In 1313, they were lavishly welcomed by her family, the French court, for a summer of pageantry. A delicate peace hung between Edward and the reformers who’d killed Gaveston. Edward won parliamentary consent and a papal loan for a Scottish campaign.

Part 5, Chapter 7 Summary: “Bannockburn”

Only Edward’s loyalists committed fully to his Scottish campaign. They were decimated, returning to England humiliated and weakened while his detractors retained their strength.

Part 5, Chapter 8 Summary: “New Favourites”

From 1314-1317 terrible weather created harsh conditions throughout Europe with food shortages and commercial crises. England hovered on the edge of violence. Lancaster opposed Edward and insisted on the Ordinances but eschewed direct involvement to rule his bloc. Edward enriched and empowered his favorites. Moderate magnates and churchmen worked to mediate. In 1318, a treaty formalized peace, establishing a permanent royal council and Edward’s agreement to the Ordinances.

Part 5, Chapter 9 Summary: “Civil War”

Edward’s favoring of the Despensers (father and son, both named Hugh) was seen to damage his governance and encroach on others’ rights. Welsh Marcher lords, including the Mortimers, rose in 1321. They were joined by others, including Lancaster in 1322. Edward gained the military upper hand, and a successful propaganda campaign reported that Lancaster was allying with Scotland. He was captured and executed following a show trial echoing Gaveston’s, escalating the culture of violence.

Part 5, Chapter 10 Summary: “The King’s Tyranny”

At a 1322 parliament, Edward shredded Lancaster’s reforms, rescinding most of the Ordinances. He wrought revenge, executing and imprisoning opponents with impunity. He redistributed confiscated possessions and titles, enriching the Crown. Edward and the heavily promoted Despensers ruled ruthlessly in their favor, undermining the basis of kingship: his overlordship no longer benefitted his subjects.

Part 5, Chapter 11 Summary: “Mortimer, Isabella, and Prince Edward”

In 1323, Mortimer escaped captivity and fled to France. Rumors circulated of English and continental plots to bring down Edward. France invaded Gascony; Edward feared that going to fight would invite insurrection at home. He sent his wife, Isabella, to negotiate—the new French king Charles was the third of her brothers to reign. His son followed to perform Edward’s duties of homage and officially receive his continental titles. However, Isabella suffered during the dangers of Edward’s reign, and he often treated her poorly. She refused to return. In 1325, she allied herself with Mortimer.

Part 5, Chapter 12 Summary: “Endgame”

Isabella and Mortimer invaded England in 1326; violence erupted as many rallied against them. When Edward tried to flee, they made his heir king in his absence. They executed the elder Despenser following a show trial that referenced Lancaster’s. They captured Edward and the younger Despenser.

Part 5, Chapter 13 Summary: “Abdication”

Edward’s followers were executed, but Edward himself represented a dilemma. Throughout the evolving partnership between kings and the political community, the Crown’s authority was still predicated on English governance. A parliament, backed by leading bishops, decided governance should pass to his son. Edward was forced to abdicate; otherwise, the deposition of his whole bloodline was threatened.

Part 5, Chapter 14 Summary: “False Dawn”

Edward III’s lavish coronation in 1327 enforced the idea that the Crown retained power; however, Isabella and particularly Mortimer were in control. Edward II died in captivity, his death later rumored as murder on Mortimer’s orders. Domestic problems abounded. Continental and Scottish policies were failures, relinquishing land and rights, and overlordship, respectively. Edward III’s marriage was diplomatically helpful, and in 1230, his new wife was pregnant. Hostility grew towards Mortimer’s self-aggrandizing, self-interested governance; he summarily executed Edward III’s half-brother in 1230 for his opposition. Edward III began to plan a coup.

Part 5 Analysis

In this section Jones focuses heavily on The Changing Structures of Governance: Edward II’s reign represented a fraught reckoning of the nature of kingship and English political systems.

Some legal structures collapsed during the chaotic civil strife. A series of show trials diminished the rule of law, with the extra-judicial execution of Gaveston starting a cycle of violence as Edward later retaliated. Jones highlights that political assassination was not a common or accepted phenomenon, noting the horror at previous isolated incidents like Beckett and Arthur of Brittany’s deaths. The self-interested and arbitrary governance of Edward II broadly undermined the rule of law, then by Isabella and Mortimer, who often sought to bypass legal structures.

However, this collapse of legal and political structures was often prompted by and resulted in, assertions of them. The political community asserted their rights and negotiated the role of the king and parliament. Through the 1208 parliamentary ordinances, they formally proclaimed a separation between the king’s office and the king’s person and asserted that the king could not go to war without their permission. This started to formalize parliament’s role and powers. Edward pursued his process of negotiation: though he centered Gaveston at his coronation, he also formally acknowledged the political community in the ceremony. Jones shows how civil strife in this period damaged governmental structures in the short term but developed long-term structural precedents and the ideas that underlay these.

Through these ideas, this period also contributed to English Cultural Development. Jones creates a sense of the barons as a united class, stressing that they were not naturally opposed to royal authority but would act cohesively to control government if they felt the king was failing them. He highlights their cooperation in keeping peace whilst capturing Gaveston in 1312. He also broadens his account at times to incorporate social history and show the connection of these political players to everyday life in England. For example, he states that purveyance was a financial drain on ordinary people, local government, and, therefore, magnates. He describes the bigger picture of the period, which saw bad weather, mass starvation, and commercial downturns throughout rural Europe. In England, this combined with the events of Edward’s reign to create a widespread narrative of strange and unsettling times, which Jones illustrates through the peculiar stories that spread. He shows how popular culture responded to political and socioeconomic events.

In this section, he also highlights The Role of the Personal in History: Edward’s character and his relationships with his favorites, especially Gaveston, are central to Jones’s narrative. Jones uses dramatic pathos to entertain, drawing vivid character portraits of Gaveston’s infuriating personality, and expounding on Edward’s grief at his death to show the role of human emotions in determining the course of events. He also uses the heavily personal nature of this section to acknowledge bias in primary sources (written in a time of popular blame towards Edward for its violent instability) and highlight the impossibility of truly knowing the nature of a relationship or a person’s feelings in the past. He notes that the details of Edward and Gaveston’s relationship do not have to be understood to explore the significant consequences of it. Jones shows that the personal plays a role in history but acknowledges the limitations of modern historical study in engaging with this concept.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text