logo

35 pages 1 hour read

Richard Louv

The Nature Principle

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2011

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 4: “Creating Everyday Eden: High-Tech/High-Nature Design Where We Live, Work, and Play”

Chapter 13 Summary: “The Nature Principle at Home”

While many yards are grass lawns, Karen Harwell decided to make her urban yard a garden oasis open to her community. Her yard has bees, native plants, a duck pond, fruit trees and a garden, and teenagers and their families visit her yard to enjoy the urban nature and help harvest. Harwell is part of a growing community of “home nature-restoration” in which nature is locals restore nature instead of searching in typical wilderness settings.

The home nature-restoration trend is turning into a marketing and architecture design trend, with “housing design philosophy” placing emphasis on “conserving energy, using earth-friendly materials, and also applying biophilic design principles to promote health, human energy and beauty” (161). As companies search to make their buildings eco-friendlier, some have even included electronic nature scenes, which are proven to be more beneficial than no nature scene, but less so than actual windows to nature.

Louv explores how urban gardening and suburban planning can work to reincorporate native flora and fauna into the environment. He recognizes that while wilderness is ideal, humans must learn to co-habituate with nature in a way that restores and sustains local wildlife and plants. Tallamy, a professor of Entomology, emphasizes the importance of native plants on rebuilding local food webs and sustaining insect and animal populations.

Louv acknowledges that small steps toward change are worth more than nothing: “For my family, the restorative home and garden remains a work in progress. But we’re moving in the right direction” (173). 

Chapter 14 Summary: “Stop, Look Up, and Listen”

Noise pollution affects us in ways we aren’t necessarily cognizant of, while others are acutely aware of its effects. One gardener wears noise-canceling headphones because of the car alarms and leaf blowers in her neighborhood. Noise pollution can affect sleep patterns, blood pressure and brain chemistry, reproductive success, and the survival of sea life. Some communities are creating trade-in programs to replace gas powered lawnmowers and leaf-blowers with electric ones. Louv calls for action to create silence sanctuaries and anti-noise campaigns.

Light pollution is causing sky blindness, a separation from, and unawareness of, the dark sky and constellations. Humans are constantly subjected to artificial light, and its absence, according to Louv, is important. Light pollution and working night shifts are suspected to have carcinogenic effects. Still, not all researchers are convinced that studying the stars is natural, and they suggest that we evolved to not look upwards. 

Chapter 15 Summary: “Nature Neurons Go to Work”

Green architecture can help promote productivity in the workplace and reduce absenteeism. “Sick building syndrome” can be avoided by having natural ventilation, indoor plants, natural lighting, outdoor views, outdoor meetings, and garden venues. There are architects and planners that are using nature as inspiration for more natural buildings, which, in addition to being better for workers, also helps to conserve energy.

Natural design is also a way of using universal design, which considers people who have varying degrees of mobility: “As a philosophy, universal design acknowledges that the best design encompasses the full human community” (189). Louv takes this philosophy one step further with “universe design,” which takes into consideration humans and animals into the design process. Biomimicry, or the idea that “all human inventions have already appeared in nature” (189), is appearing more in architecture. For example, the award-winning designer of a shopping complex in Zimbabwe was inspired by termite mounds to design an air-flow system that conserved energy and was cost effective.

Getting business and the marketplace interested in universal design or biomimicry is important for creating a sustainable future and has proven to be good for business. Technology that allows people to become closer to nature, such as cameras and other gadgets, is big business. Louv has an idea for a gadget that would connect people to nature: a toy gun with a digital camera: “Point this device at a bird and click, and the image is immediately sent to your own Web-based life list, and to a Web site that maps and tracks species migrations and sightings” (194). Creative products such as this could be a big market for our future naturalists that have grown up with technology. If we start thinking with an entrepreneurial and business-savvy mind, we can create “nature-smart businesses” that add to our connection with nature. 

Chapter 16 Summary: “Living in a Restorative City”

While our initial reaction to finding nature might evoke images of national parks and wilderness, urban areas also provide nature refuge. Louv posits that to have a sustainable connection with nature, we need to incorporate nature into our suburban and urban areas, which he calls a “natural urban renewal movement” (199). He suggests that public policy offer incentives to cities for building “eco villages.”

Louv gives recommendations for public land planning that would enhance and restore our connection to the natural environment. From green roofs and solar collectors to raised beds in abandoned lots, his recommendations include large changes at the public policy level and small changes in local neighborhoods.

One non-profit organization, The Greening of Detroit, is working to restore trees and gardens in local communities. These small changes at the local level have helped to create major change higher up when it comes to creating jobs, connecting people, and conserving land for public parks. An additional benefit of the greening movement is food production, with community and urban gardens producing “significant amounts of food.” Land conservation isn’t without its controversies, with gentrification pushing out residents when green space increases property value and neighbors disagreeing on how to use public land.

Louv proposes “De-Central Park,” in which small green areas are stitched together and preserved to create a string of public green space. By stitching together button parks or pocket parks, “[t]he central organizing principle of nearby-nature trusts would be do it yourself, do it now, with a little help and information from friends who might know about land trusts” (212). By revitalizing cities, local municipalities have worked to bring back wildlife, increase tourism and property value. While some view wildlife as a risk to humans, many view wildlife as a significantly small threat for a large return of the natural environment, and Louv believes that much of the threat could be avoided with “wisely designed development patterns” (217). 

Chapter 17 Summary: “Little Suburb on the Prairie”

Steve Nygren, a restaurateur in Atlanta, Georgia, has had a large impact on land conservation in the surrounding area. After seeing the benefits to his family spending the weekends on their family acreage in the countryside, they moved there permanently and took up land conservation. Nygren finances the local community called Serenbe, which lobbies for land preservation and creating a country community of gardens, water conservation, and simple outdoor living.

Nygren’s is an extreme example of one citizen spending his life to conserve and preserve our natural world and working to find a way for humans to live in harmony with it. While there are some critics of this way of life, as the purveyors are automobile dependent and able to afford it, there is no doubt that a different type of land planning is needed for our future. One interesting land planning policy that Louv presents is going to non-traditional burials, by using green burials in public land, this would ensure that the land would not be rezoned into parking lots.

Urban traffic planning plays a role in building eco-cities as well, with bicycles and foot traffic helping to connect pedestrians to the local environment. Louv points out that while new neighborhoods like Serenbe are important, it’s “the re-naturing of existing neighborhoods” and “the creation of restorative transportation” (231) that’s needed. Regeneration of creativity, green space and walkability would do wonders to our current communities. 

Part 4 Analysis

Louv openly acknowledges that he doesn’t own a house with a complete native plant garden space and butterfly garden. He is making small steps towards change, but not drastic efforts. By acknowledging that he is not perfect or super motivated, he relates to the average reader who doesn’t think they have time or money to make a change. By keeping his recommendations attainable, it is more likely that the reader will feel connected to his ideas and a sense of hope that change is possible. This strategy is one that Louv continues to employ throughout his argument for the nature-deficit disorder.

Money talks and in our capitalist, consumerist society, unless something is going to make or save money, it is not likely to catch on or become incorporated into our society. Louv is aware of this hinderance and presents multiple ways that urban planning that incorporates nature can save and make money. He is addressing criticisms before they arise.

Louv does not steer away from controversial issues. He presents both sides of every argument, acknowledges the gaps in the research, makes a case for his point of view, but he ultimately leaves the decision up to the reader. Depending on the reader’s background, experience and interpretation of the evidence-based research, there are some ideas that Louv presents that the reader may not agree with.

Technology is a controversial issue when it comes to nature enthusiasts. While Louv is not necessarily for all technology, he understands that incorporating different types of technology will help to attract younger generations to nature and that this is a greater benefit than trying to eradicate technology. This is one example of how Louv attempts to make his argument sustainable for the long-term.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text