logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Marie Benedict

The Mitford Affair

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Intersection Between the Political and the Personal

In The Mitford Affair, questions of the boundaries between the political and the personal are a central theme that helps to drive the momentum of the narrative, and to shape the novel’s treatment of conflict, turmoil, and moral responsibility.

Nancy is the character who best represents a balanced view of personal and political life. She has political opinions, but her moderation sometimes means her commitment is overshadowed by the fanaticism of her sisters. Through her novels, Nancy criticizes her family and social group, especially examining the role of politics within society, making personal material a means to express public political views. Much of the book’s moral and emotional momentum is maintained by Nancy questioning her motives and acknowledging that her personal feelings affect her political and moral decision-making. That Nancy is asking these questions about fact versus fiction highlights that she is able to rationally balance her political and personal duties, and makes her a model in the book for this theme.

Politics also becomes personal for Nancy because of the internal dynamics between her and her family, especially when she takes a stand against her political sisters. The novel’s emotional crisis point is when Nancy is forced to decide between politics and her personal feelings. Nancy doesn’t want to spy on Diana but she pushes her personal feelings aside for the good of the country, making a personal sacrifice for political principles. The book’s depiction of her decision-making is part of the book’s exploration of how moral responsibility is made up of personal choices. In direct contrast, Benedict explores the use of politics as a means for personal advancement through the character of Diana. Diana is invested in fascism as part of the ambition she has for Mosley within the fascist system and herself by extension. The novel suggests that her allegiance to fascism is because it aligns with her sense of self, particularly her entitlement.

Unity’s political leanings transform her personal life entirely. Unity doesn’t have a fully formed identity when she discovers fascism; therefore, fascism becomes her identity. Before moving to Germany, Unity feels ostracized from her family and society; she’s tall, awkward, and quirky. Ironically, though, Unity gives up on the very quirks which make her feel out of sorts when she adopts all of Hitler’s expectations of the perfect Aryan woman. Unity’s attempt to die by suicide highlights that Unity has no ability to rationalize between politics and the personal because she has allowed fascism to define her completely. Diana encourages Unity’s passion for Hitler so that Diana can get closer to Hitler and use his vast financial connections to benefit Mosley’s career. Diana vacillates between the political and the personal depending on what suits her in the moment: When she abandons Unity in Germany to seek her own safety, she shows the extent of her selfishness and that she has not been acting through political idealism. Through the characters of Unity and Diana, the novel exemplifies the various dangers of misaligning the personal and the political, in contrast to the more balanced approach which Nancy personifies.

Social Expectations of Upper-Class Women in the 20th-Century

The Mitford Affair takes place in the mid to late 1930s and the early 1940s and the three central characters’ identities, choices, and experiences are shown to be heavily influenced by social expectations of women at the time, especially for women in the upper class. All three major characters struggle with gender norms: Diana because she is bored by the life allotted to her, Nancy because of the varying extent to which her various abilities intersect with expectations, and Unity because she mistakes objectification for love.

Unity is physically close to the Nazi ideal of the perfect “Aryan” woman. The narrative shows her awareness of this and her efforts to maintain a level of perfection, living up to exacting, misogynistic standards of fascist feminine ideals. The novel creates dramatic irony and tragedy by showing the reader more insight into this reality than Unity has of her situation. She is used by Hitler and the Nazi propaganda machine, which exploit her as they choose, mostly based on the objectification of her person. Much of the pathos is created by the fact that Unity’s initial decisions were driven by a wish to escape the expectations placed on the English debutante, which make her feel anxious and unwanted. Because she mistakes her usefulness to the Nazi Party as their love, she doesn’t see that she has swapped one form of objectification for another, nor that her new position is far more precarious than her previous life in London. Unity’s narrative also touches on the complex rivalry that can exist between women in sexist societies. Unity compared herself unfavorably to her peers in society London and feels a rush when she is admired by other women at Nazi events. The novel shows her failing to appreciate that these women only see her as a model because she is an object of Nazi approval and being used as a proxy by Nazi propaganda, not because of who she is in herself.

Diana has a complex relationship with gender norms. Her urge to step away from the norms of gender (her first husband and their idyllic wealthy life and family) suggests that she wishes for something other in her life and chafes against the roles which have been laid out for her and which she apparently fills so well. This inner conflict is again shown when she deliberately plays the submissive and supportive partner to Mosley, allowing him to take central stage even in situations that she has herself constructed and made happen. The narrative, however, shows the reader that she is the driving force in their political partnership and that her apparent submission is pragmatic. For example, it’s Mosley who travels to Paris to have a meeting about the German radio broadcasts, even though the whole plan is Diana’s idea. Mosley takes public credit for the rise of the BUF in Britain, even though it’s Diana who helps connect Mosley to financiers that allow the BUF to survive. Diana has her own political motivations because she is a woman of ambition Diana is ruthless, pragmatic, and uses her femininity to get ahead. She knows that Hitler is attracted to her and uses the hint of sexuality to get what she needs from him. The novel shows Diana consciously negotiating the confines of her personal power as a woman and explores the moral dilemma of a (beautiful) woman at the time, who could exert most power by manipulating others.

Nancy rejects aspects of traditional femininity in some areas of her life, acting with direct agency as a writer, thinker, and political activist. Nancy is a well-known published author in a field that is typically dominated by men. She has the respect of powerful men like Winston Churchill without using her sexuality; Churchill appreciates Nancy’s intelligence and sense of patriotism, not her beauty. She volunteers to serve people in need, unusual for a woman of her standing, but Nancy does not reject all of the traditional female role. On the contrary, she displays maternal instincts in her family and wishes deeply for children. Her lack of children makes her question her purpose and in this way the novel explores the burden of female expectations. Nancy not only experiences personal unhappiness but from an internalized sense of deficiency when she is not able to fulfill the role of mother. Her desire to be married, and to maintain her difficult marriage, is presented in the novel as part of her longing for children and the novel therefore subtly explores how fixed social traditions and the ideal of the nuclear family limited the personal freedoms and happiness of individuals, especially women.

The Ability of Power to Corrupt

In The Mitford Affair, Benedict highlights how easily a sense of power or a wish for power can corrupt the individual.

Diana is the most corrupted by power. In Mosley, she sees a future in which she is a leader, as Mosley’s puppet-master. A relationship with Mosley can lead to her own power if she can ensure that Mosley gains his power and stays with her. Thus, Diana gives up the ethical codes she is raised with and causes a scandal for the sake of the potential promise of power. Her divorce and acceptance to be Mosley’s mistress while he is still married makes her a shocking figure in society. Diana chooses to turn away from the norms of her society even though she was once celebrated for being the embodiment of everything that society would admire in a woman. Diana realizes that she must lean into Mosley full force, otherwise her sacrifices will be futile. Diana’s thirst for power becomes her main motivation. She sacrifices Unity’s well-being for her own desire for power and is unapologetic in the face of accusations of her corruption.

Unity’s moral code is completely subsumed by her proximity to power. Hitler’s power and influence are seductive to Unity, who projects her own lack of autonomy and power onto him. In falling in love with Hitler, Unity is actually falling in love with the privileges of power. With Hitler, Unity has the power of persuasion, of fame, of free luxury, and of admiration. She stops thinking critically about the impact of fascism on the greater good because she is so addicted to the power that Hitler has and shares with her. Ultimately, Unity is corrupted by power to the detriment of her own life. That she is powerful is a delusion; she only feels powerful because of the rewards she gets by her usefulness to a dangerous and powerful man. The corruption of Unity’s personhood is so complete that she attempts suicide, representative of the destructiveness of malign power.

With both characters, the novel reveals the nature of power, especially when it stems from entitlement. Both Diana and Unity are able to pursue power in the way that they do because they are already extremely privileged. Their social status, connections, and relative wealth give them unusual freedoms which, the novel suggests, can be highly dangerous without a good purpose, conscience, or advice. Both characters assume a level of power which is expressive of entitlement and exceptionalism, and both seem unaware of their huge level of privilege. In this way, the novel examines the nature of power in Britain at a time of social change, especially the potentially disruptive influence of those who have power as a result of birth, class, or wealth, rather than those who gain it through personal aptitude, hard work, or popular consent.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text