20 pages • 40 minutes read
Toni Cade BambaraA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Many of the toys in the Fifth Avenue toy store are so expensive, and so seemingly useless and decorative, that they are easy for the narrator to dismiss. She finds a $480 paperweight to be strange and ugly, and a $1,000 sailboat to be, while undeniably beautiful, more of an ornament than a toy. The narrator understands intuitively that the true purpose of these items is not one of amusement but rather to project power and status. They are ultimately more for adults than for children, and their outrageous expensiveness is their entire point.
At the same time, the opulence and exclusivity of the store confuses the narrator, as it does the other children on the excursion. While the narrator and the other children are verbal and animated outside of the store, pointing out different items in the windows to one another, they fall into a cowed silence—one that the narrator compares to the hush of a church service—upon entering the store. Even though the narrator finds individual items in the store to be merely strange and ridiculous, there is something about the atmosphere of the store that she, and the other children, are unable to dismiss. As a store in a rich white neighborhood, it is an alien atmosphere to the narrator in many ways, and part of her intimidated silence springs from not knowing the codes and feeling conspicuous and watched. At the same time, even if the narrator does not understand the codes and rituals of the store and its wealthy customers, she does understand the store to be a kind of hub. As with the Catholic church service that she tells us she witnessed, she understands the hush and pomp of the store to signify centrality and power: in this case the power not of religion, but of money.
The store is therefore rarefied to the narrator in one way, and familiar to her in another way. The narrator understands herself to speak the language of money as much as the store’s wealthy customers, even if she has far less money than they have. On the subway ride home from the store, the narrator recalls a clown toy in the store that, at $35, was relatively inexpensive; she reflects on all of the more useful things that she and her family could buy, or secure, with that money, such as rental payments and visits to distant relatives. While some of her frustration is with the plain unfairness of this situation, some of her frustration is also with her own helpless complicity in it. She cannot help knowing exactly how much things cost, and she cannot help wanting the things that she has been conditioned to want. This is perhaps one reason why she holds back from expressing the outrage that Miss Moore so obviously wants her to express: She feels that this outrage does not go far enough. Miss Moore is trying to goad the children into demanding “their share of the pie,” while the narrator is unsure “what kind of pie she talkin about in the first damn place” (94-95).
The narrator’s discomfort with capitalism—as opposed to the tidy class and racial divides that Miss Moore would like her to focus on—manifests itself to her as a vague feeling of queasy wrongness: “And something weird is going on, I can feel it in my chest” (95). It is a feeling that she can only try to expunge, by lashing out both at Miss Moore and at her best friend Sugar. She does the latter by sneaking off on her own, after first telling Sugar that she will join her on a candy-buying spree. While first stealing money from Miss Moore and then not even spending it may seem a perverse and pointless act, for the narrator it makes a contrarian kind of sense. It is her small rebellion against the rat race of consumer culture.
Miss Moore is a distinctly adult character, who has nevertheless decided that she needs to guide and teach the neighborhood children. She has chosen an unconventional, independent life for herself, and her every action and utterance seems deliberate and composed. While we do not know anything about her past, we can assume that her independence has been hard-earned. In many ways she is outside of the society in which she lives, even while she is assuming a central, active role for herself; her mixture of solitude and bossiness earns her mockery and resentment from both the adults and children in her neighborhood.
Miss Moore wants what she believes is best for the children whom she takes under her wing. She wants them to understand the limits of where they come from, and to not accept their geography as destiny. Her intentions are high-minded and good, but she also has impossible expectations. She herself has an adult distance on her neighborhood, and on the plight of people like her in general: a distance that it has presumably taken her some time and effort to acquire. However, she expects the children around her—many of who know little else but their neighborhood—to acquire this sophisticated distance all at once. She expects them in a certain way to skip over their childhoods, even while she is trying to shelter them from pain and disillusionment.
What Miss Moore intends as a bracing call to action, the children around her interpret as dry, dull, and predictable. Although she is trying to wake the children up to the realities of their lives, she is on her own sort of adult autopilot. She does not know how to speak to the children in any other style but that of a lecturer; she does not know how to speak to them on their level. The children therefore hear all of the condescension and detachment in her speech, and none of the urgency and conviction behind it. In one way, they are more astute than she gives them credit for being; in another way they are still children, and need to be approached with delicacy and respect.
One important difference between the narrator and Miss Moore lies in their different ideas of class and racial pride. Because the narrator is a child, her idea is more empirical intuition than fully formed idea; nevertheless, she is acutely aware of the distance between Fifth Avenue and her own neighborhood, and of the difference between rich white people and herself. She also does not think of her own community as inferior to this insular wealthy community; rather, seeing a white woman wearing a fur coat on the street during a hot summer day bemuses her.
The irony is that Miss Moore is trying to instill a sense of pride and entitlement in the narrator, as well as in the other neighborhood children. She does not see that the narrator has plenty of pride and resilient selfhood already. This is because Miss Moore’s idea of pride lies not in defending your origins but in transcending them, and to a degree, emulating people like the woman in the fur coat. She is always telling the neighborhood children first that they are defined by their neighborhood, and also that they can escape it if they fight very hard. However, the neighborhood children neither wish to escape their neighborhood nor see themselves as being defined by it; to them, as with most children, their neighborhood is simply their taken-for-granted home.
The narrator describes Miss Moore in the story’s opening paragraph as having “nappy” hair and wearing no makeup, while also having a “proper” style of speech (87). Miss Moore’s elegant manners and her lack of feminine artifice seem to strike the narrator as equally affected and odd, and we can infer that they are one thing that separates her from the adult women around her, who perhaps have more stylized appearances and more casual manners. Yet Miss Moore and these women may regard one another in the same pitying way, as not having enough pride in their black heritage. For Miss Moore, the neighborhood women perhaps appear as if they are trying to look white, by straightening their hair; to these women, in turn, Miss Moore may seem to be trying to act white, in separating herself from her community.
By Toni Cade Bambara