68 pages • 2 hours read
Benjamin GrahamA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Graham discusses investment funds, which are funds that enable individuals to combine their finances and allocate them toward a diversified range of assets. Investment funds can be “open-end,” meaning investors can buy and sell shares at any time, or “closed-end,” meaning that the number of shares remains fixed and shares are traded on secondary markets. He explains three ways to categorize investment funds: by portfolio composition (balanced funds, stock funds, bond funds, hedge funds, letter-stock funds), by objectives (growth, price, stability), and by method of sale (load funds, no-load funds).
He addresses three main questions regarding investment funds, exploring whether it is possible for the intelligent investor to choose a fund that outperforms the market, avoid funds that consistently underperform the market, and make smart choices between the different types of funds.
To draw conclusions about investment fund performance in general, Graham examines the results of ten large mutual funds during the 1960s. The overall performance of these ten funds for the period between 1961 and 1970 was found to be similar to that of the S&P 500-stock composite average, and better than that of the DJIA. Graham points out that mutual funds cannot be blamed for performing about the same as the market since they manage so many stocks that it becomes difficult for them to deviate significantly from market performance. In selecting an investment fund, Graham advises the intelligent investor to consider a fund’s performance for the past five years, cautioning against any funds whose management takes speculative risks.
Graham addresses the phenomenon of “performance” funds, which are mutual funds that aim to outperform the market by actively managing the fund’s portfolio. He also compares closed-end and open-end funds. Open-end funds usually have “salesmen” or financial advisors who sell the shares directly to investors and charge a sales fee or commission for their services. On the other hand, closed-end funds differ in organizational structure and method of sale. Closed-end funds have a fixed number of shares. Graham explains that closed-end funds have certain advantages over open-end (mutual) funds. He claims that closed-end shares, if bought at a discount, can provide better results than mutual funds. As an approximation, he estimates that shares of a closed-end fund bought at 10% to 15% of a discount will earn about one-fifth more money than open-ended shares bought at a typical price of about 9% above asset value.
Zweig asserts that while mutual funds have great upsides, they “aren’t perfect; they are almost perfect, and that word makes all the difference” (242). Due to their flaws, he says, they tend to underperform compared to the market average.
He highlights how difficult it is for funds to outperform the market. Managers who perform well tend to get poached by rival funds; actively managed funds have high operating costs; funds tend to copy each other’s portfolios; and there are inefficiencies inherent in trying to beat the market.
According to Zweig, some of the markers of successful funds include managers who own significant numbers of shares in their fund; funds with low expenses; funds that have a long-term focus; and funds that have a disciplined investment process.
Graham discusses the types of people who amateur investors usually turn to for investment advice: relatives, friends, bankers, brokerage firms, financial advisors, and investment counselors.
He views investment counselors as conservative, cautious, competent, and therefore trustworthy. These professionals do not promise clients extreme results and instead aim for modest returns, which Graham regards as reasonable and prudent. While investment counsel firms are geared toward wealthier people who do not want to manage their own financial decisions, financial services are not limited to individuals with high income or financial assets. They generally serve those who are managing their own portfolio. In Graham’s experience, some financial advisors base stock selection on near-term outlook, without regard to price. He sees this as antithetical to the philosophy of the intelligent investor.
In discussing brokerage houses, Graham points out that Wall Street benefits greatly from individuals who speculate, and therefore brokerage firms are motivated to encourage speculative behavior. He advises any investor who seeks counsel from a brokerage house to explicitly state their intentions and their investing philosophy and make clear that they do not wish to speculate.
Graham discusses the role of financial analysts, highlighting their ability to provide valuable information to individual investors. He comments on the importance of the CFA (chartered financial analyst) certification, which was newly instated in 1963, and which served to formalize the standards and ethics of the financial analyst profession.
Lastly, Graham addresses advisors who may play a more informal role in the lives of investors. He views local bankers as a potential source of reliable advice, as they have a good understanding of their clients’ financial situations. On the other hand, he believes that the investor who turns to family or friends for advice typically relies on emotional biases rather than objective analysis. He recommends discernment when seeking advice from such sources.
Zweig highlights a handful of ways to tell whether an investor should seek advice from outside sources. One indication is significant losses in previous investments. Another indicator is a lack of portfolio diversification. Furthermore, an individual who is facing difficulties in effectively managing their budget should seek help. And lastly, investors who have experienced major life changes, such as retirement, should also consider seeking advice from outside sources.
Zweig advises the intelligent investor to do their due diligence in selecting a reliable source of investment advice. He instructs investors to determine whether an advisor is qualified and caring and whether they follow the investment principles outlined in The Intelligent Investor. This can be done by carefully preparing questions and interviewing any potential advisor. Zweig also mentions that investors should, in turn, be prepared to give good answers to any questions that an advisor poses to them as they will likewise try to discern whether the investor is a good fit for their services.
Graham provides advice for analyzing securities to determine their value. While security analysis is complex, Graham aims to convey to the non-professional investor a basic understanding of how to assess stocks and bonds, so that they will be equipped, at the very least, to understand professional security analysts and discern between valid and invalid analysis.
Graham begins by reviewing bond analysis. He notes that when investing in bonds, the key factors are the issuer’s financial strength and the bond’s terms and conditions. He provides various tests that one can apply to determine the strength of a bond investment. These tests include examining the size of the company, stock-to-equity ratio, and property value.
When analyzing stocks, Graham recommends estimating future earnings and multiplying that figure by a “capitalization factor.” This capitalization factor is determined by the strength and structure of stock, the dividends, the management of the company, and the company’s growth potential. Furthermore, Graham emphasizes the importance of conducting a thorough financial analysis of a company before making any investment decisions.
Graham also stresses the need for investors to have a margin of safety when purchasing stocks. He gives a general formula for assessing growth stocks: Multiply the expected annual growth rate by 2, add 8.5 to that figure, and multiply the sum by current earnings to receive the estimated value of the growth stock. This valuation will be conservative, which ensures an adequate margin of safety.
Graham discusses the practice of industry analysis. Industry analysis involves examining the overall trends and market conditions of a specific industry to gauge the future performance of companies within that industry. By analyzing industry conditions, investors can determine which industries are more likely to thrive and which ones may face challenges. Graham does not find industry analysis to be as crucial as analyzing individual securities, but he acknowledges its importance in identifying potential investment opportunities, specifically in rapidly growing fields like technology.
Zweig lists factors to consider when evaluating investment opportunities such as competitive advantage, management, debt, acquisitions, research and development, and growth trajectory. When examining a company’s management, Zweig recommends asking whether they have demonstrated a consistent ability to overcome obstacles and generate value for their investors. Additionally, he highlights the importance of analyzing a company’s capital structure as it can impact its profitability. Concerning dividends, Zweig believes that “the burden of proof is on the company to show that you are better off if it does not pay a dividend” (309). In general, companies that underperform and do not pay dividends are not putting their money to good use.
In this section, Graham explores the concept of financial expertise, examining the relationship between the novice investor and the finance professional. He addresses the performance of investment funds and the role that they can play in the intelligent investor’s portfolio, and he also provides opinions on the different types of advisors available to investors. As with every subject, Graham takes a discerning view of financial expertise and the professionals who provide it.
Graham does not place blind faith in either professionals or laypeople but rather examines their respective strengths and weaknesses. While he concludes that investment funds rarely beat the market, he acknowledges the merits of having a financial advisor. And while he displays skepticism toward those who seek the advice of family or friends without expertise, he also argues throughout the book that lack of expertise—or at least, lack of interest—in investing can be a fundamental advantage. Since, as Graham says in the introduction, “an investor’s chief problem—and even his worst enemy—is likely to be himself,” novices who are cognizant of their emotional reactions and limitations may have a better chance of making sound investment decisions than professionals who suffer from overconfidence and other cognitive biases (8).
In Chapter 11, Graham provides an overview of how to perform security analysis, with the aim of teaching novice investors enough about the subject so that they can understand professionals and discern the credibility of their advice. As seen throughout the book, Graham takes a realistic view of investors and does not expect all of them to want to become experts in security analysis. Nevertheless, he believes they should be equipped with enough information to protect themselves—enough to assess the credibility and effectiveness of the professionals they may choose to seek advice from.
The fact that even experts—those who manage investment funds—are unable to reliably beat the market shows just how challenging it is to obtain better-than-average returns. This conclusion serves as an implicit argument in favor of the defensive approach to investing, which is characterized by a focus on long-term stability and preservation of capital rather than attempting to outperform the market. In other words, Graham reinforces his argument that a little—or sometimes even a lot—of knowledge or expertise is not enough to promise superior investment performance and that defaulting to the defensive approach can be a wise strategy for many investors.