32 pages • 1 hour read
Friedrich NietzscheA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Throughout The Gay Science, Nietzsche treats the concept of egoism as a major theme. Nietzsche proposes egoism as the root of consciousness, which evolves from humanity’s selfish need to preserve the species. According to Nietzsche, both the ancient Greeks and, later, the Christians limited their egoism by belief in divinity. They wrongly believed themselves flawed. Over time, the problem of survival became less of an uncertainty, and the problem shifted to what is the most ideal way to survive. This answer is different for each individual, Nietzsche explains, and depends on one’s instincts; that is, it depends on their identity, which is egoism.Religion lost its authority among individuals who possessed a selfish need to relieve their own suffering.
Nietzsche believes ego drives the quest for all new knowledge:
The inventing of Gods, heroes, and supermen of all kinds, as well as coordinate men and undermen–dwarfs, fairies, centaurs, satyrs, demons, devils–was the inestimable preliminary to the justification of the selfishness and sovereignty of the individual: the freedom which was granted to one God in respect to other Gods, was at last given to the individual himself in respect to laws, customs and neighbors (97).
Nietzsche here explains how the authority of the gods shifted into the hands of those individuals fearless and courageous enough to trust their own instincts towards fulfillment and happiness and eschew herd mentality and moral conventions, which are weighed down by self-doubt.
Ego undermines belief in God, Nietzsche contends, and is also essential for creating new knowledge. Nietzsche's ideal philosopher and individual, the Dionysian pessimist, is an individual driven by an almost tyrannical need to experience the new, and to be willing to suffer. It’s each individual’s relationship with their ego, and the fulfillment of its needs, that Nietzsche proposes as worthy.
Nietzsche dedicates ample space inThe Gay Science to interrogating the paradox that knowledge is an artifice. Consistently, he subverts his own argument in order to show that there is not and cannot be an absolute truth. Language, for example, Nietzsche explains, represents an agreed-upon labeling system; if letters and words are not agreed upon, then the word ‘dog,’ instead of being spelled as it is, could be spelled ‘sdjfkjskldjlgsdflgjd,’ and could mean ‘platypus.’ While this notion seems absurd to the average person, it’s also not unthinkable, and thereby supports the notion that there can be no absolute truth.
In “Book Second,” Nietzsche claims love of reality “is an old primitive love” (51). Elsewhere in The Gay Science, he proposes that logic and science both represent only a selection of the entire vacuum of existence and can never amount to complete truth. In that same vein, Nietzsche proposes that one can never trace cause and effect back to a legitimate source. Too often, humankind misunderstands that “need is supposed to be the cause of things; but in truth it is often only the result of things” (109). In this way, individuals’ near-tyrannical need for knowledge, which results, according to Nietzsche, from deep suffering, is not a cause, and, instead, a result: “he who looks into himself, as into an immense universe, and carries Milky Ways in himself, knows also how […] they lead into the very chaos and labyrinth of existence” (140).
Truth is something that eludes the seeker, yet Nietzsche proposes this very seeking is an essential element of the kind of ego behind great philosophic thinking and great individuals. The entire book grows from, and hovers around, Nietzsche’s belief in the journey towards knowledge that empowers the fearless individual, even if only for a limited time.
Nietzsche’s themes often connect, with one branching from another. A third major theme in The Gay Science is the idea of philosophy, and knowledge, as medicine. Nietzsche refers to this concept as the gay science, celebrating the joy knowledge and art bring. There is a jovial, comic tone present “Prelude in Rhyme,” and Nietzsche has praise for ancient Greek artists, whose mastery of meter on the stage stole language from everyday speaking and transformed it into dramatic, poetic verse, allowing humankind “to not lose the free dominion over things,” (80) and to see themselves as more than just observers. In the book’s closing paragraphs, Nietzsche offers the simile of the good philosopher as a dancer. He proposes philosophy grows out of a human need to alleviate suffering. Nietzsche’s prescribes fearless and playful individual interrogation of all preexisting and received knowledge and proposes life as a means towards discovering knowledge.
By Friedrich Nietzsche