logo

32 pages 1 hour read

Friedrich Nietzsche

The Gay Science

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1882

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Jest, Ruse and Revenge: A Prelude In Rhyme-Book SecondChapter Summaries & Analyses

Summary: “Jest, Ruse and Revenge: A Prelude In Rhyme”

In sixty-three brief verses, Nietzsche introduces the voice of the free-spirit, medieval, troubadour knight of the poems in The Gay Science. With titles like “My Cruelty,” “The Disguised Saint,” and “Taste in Choosing,” the verses touch on themes of darkness, unrivaled joy, freedom, and immortality. Each one reads like an incantation, or a quick revelation. This prelude in verse sets the optimistic, profound, yet sometimes ironic tone for this book of poems, introducing us to the whimsical yet educated voice Nietzsche employs.

From the first verse, Nietzsche opens the door on a new philosophical world: “Venture, comrades, I implore you, / On the fare I set before you” (3). “A Prelude In Rhyme” evolves as though the speaker is recounting a journey from intellectual darkness and confusion to light and clarity, then back again into the dark well, before emerging with a second clarity. This alludes to the jubilant philosophical physician, discussed in the Preface, whose mission, Nietzsche says, is best described as healing a sickness. “The whole book is really nothing but a revel after long privation and impotence: the frolicking of returning energy, of newly awakened belief in a to-morrow and after to-morrow” (vii).

Nietzsche writes: “Weary of Seeking had I grown, / So taught myself the way to Find” (3). The themes of these verses range from dark to optimistic. The final verse includes thematic and craft elements of the previous sixty-two: “Roll calmly on, let time go by. Let sorrows pass thee–nations die! […] To thee one law–be pure and bright!” (16)

Summary: “Book First”

In “Book First,” Nietzsche traces the evolution of identity from its roots in self-preservation to the emergence of egoism. Taken to an extreme, egoism breeds a fight for sovereignty, which can lead to tyranny. Nietzsche analyzes how the motives of love and unselfishness have selfish roots, probing this paradox of life, where the instinct to find new ways of—and reasons for—living leads to a comedy and errors. Nietzschesays, “that which could have injured the race has perhaps died out many millenniums ago” (17). Since then, humankind transferred its survival instincts from preservation of the race to preservation of the individual. It’s at this point the first plank between people surfaces. Passions replace survival instincts, and these passions give rise to the great noble people of history. Such nobility of characters presents major impacts on history, affecting each individual from that time to the present moment.

“Book First” goes on toargue that while this nobility of ego produces new insights and philosophies, egoism leads to corruption and societal decay:

the old national energy and national passion, which acquired a magical splendour in war and in the tourney, has now transferred itself into innumerable private passions […] periods of ‘corruption’ the quantity and quality of the expended energy of a people is probably greater than ever (35).

Nietzsche cites Caesar, and the fall of Rome. In Caesar’s time “the men of highest culture love to flatter their Caesar by pretending that they are his creation” (35). Nietzsche argues that survival led to egoism that in turn led to nationalism, and, eventually, consumerism: a good hunter became a good statesman and in turn became a good businessman. Nietzsche laments the loss of intellectual investment and calls the industrial complex the meanest existence in history. The final pages explore the idea that consciousness is collective, and also contend that individuals fear what people will think of them less than they fear committing taboo acts. So, such a concern is at once selfish and the foundation of conscience. Here, Nietzsche puts forth the idea that an individual’s need to make themselves into a certain type of person is a major part of how individuals interpret the world. People who challenge their own selfishness become seen as noble. 

Summary: “Book Second”

Nietzsche explores how despite its illusion, art enables individuals “to not lose the free dominion over things” (80), or the independence of the soul that art provides. He proposes that one’s individual perception of themselves stems from self-made plans with roots that reach back to ancient Greek theater and beyond, as new cultures replace ancient ideas. The Romans appropriated Greek drama and mythology, and, later, Shakespeare anglicized Romanic legends. Germans like Schopenhauer and Wagner do the same. This self-understanding provides a sense of controlling forces around us, which Nietzsche proposes ancient Greeks achieved through the use of rhythm and verse, and through the art of unnatural talking on the stage.

Exploring love, language, the origins of poetry, German philosophy, language, and music, Nietzsche expands his theme of egoism and the falsehood of truth in light of human craving for knowledgefrom “Book First.” Nietzsche proposes each individual creates their own story out of boredom for the old, making old stories new and often pushing conventional boundaries, and that their actions are initially considered vulgar.

“Book Second” begins with Nietzsche drawing artifice to the idea of reality. Nietzsche declares this “love of ‘reality’ [...] an old primitive ‘love’” (51). He laments that more depends on “what things are called, than what they are” (51). Nietzsche then explores the psychology of love, proposing that women’s gentler nature inspires men’s kindnesses. He writes that mental noise and male’s “plots and plans” of love and seducing women launches epic stories, affecting people’s perceptions of identity. Nietzsche also proposes artistic creations as feminine. As these perceptions pass between different cultures and eras, the artifice of reality is also expanded on. As a collective, human beings come to agree on things, but “it is continually the most select spirits themselves who strive against universal obligatoriness–the investigators of truth above all!” (58).He continues, saying that “The accepted belief continually engenders a disgust and a new longing in the more ingenious minds [and] makes the artists and poets runaways” (58). The contradiction between the noble spirit of the runaways, who push convention, and the way society perceives these runaways as vulgar provides elements of tragicomedy Nietzsche believes essential in shaping human consciousness, as the artist “knows a chord for those secret and weird midnights of the soul” (66).

In the second half of “Book Second,” Nietzsche applies his ideas to Italian opera, proposing it’s more the tones than words which raise to beauty. He explores German romanticism, analyzing how the language of the courts produced a more sophisticated way of talking, raising German art to a higher level. “Then even the German becomes beautiful (78)”.He lists a run of Schopenhauer quotes, investigates Wagner, “the most celebrated of the living Schopenhauerians” who “made a mistake in the interpretation of the characters” (73). Nietzsche proposes Wager was misled by Hegel, alluding to the falsehood of truth, to the benefit of the beauty of the human soul and intelligence. Nietzsche proposes art is less about truth, though deep thinking and insight are the goal of art, and more about the beauty one creates. It’s the germ of an idea to which human knowledge owes gratitude.

“Jest, Ruse and Revenge: A Prelude In Rhyme”-“Book Second” Analysis

In the opening three books of The Gay Science, Nietzsche traces the selfish evolution of identity and links it to art, from the ancient to his own era. The tone ranges from poetic to comic, essayistic to sublime. By composing the book’s prelude in verse, Nietzsche includes the Greek form he will later celebrate. Here,he undermines this form in order to highlight its artifice.

In “Book First,” Nietzsche proposes that instincts to preserve the species get transferred to identity once survival becomes easier. In “Book Second,” Nietzsche applies these ideas to heroic figures, who dominate ancient cultures and modern narratives, contributing to a collective identity ranging thousands of years. When an individual, often suffering from boredom, loss, pain, or anxiety, develops a craving for something like experience, knowledge, or adventure, and seeks those experiences beyond societal norms, that person’s actions can be seen as vulgar. However, their insights and artistic creations can demonstrate a nobility which, Nietzsche proposes, the less noble admire, and even sit down to watch at the theater. It is between the poles of personal experience, between admiration or distaste in others’ stories, that each individual perceives themselves. To this end, individuals construct their identity in relation to others, and always in relation to stories and myths. Further, individuals hear about the glory and renown of another and seek to emulate this in themselves. The Greeks referred to this as kleos.   

Nietzsche wants to analyze collective consciousness and inspire a freedom of individual thought and spirit; at the same time, he wants individuals to take responsibility for this freedom. To do so, people must realize how stories of the pastshape their present identity. “Book First” concludes on a comic and paradoxical noteas Nietzsche praises distress, which leads to new knowledge, despite philosophy’s supposed goal of alleviating distress. To find joy and to create, despite distress, is the gay science. Nietzsche finds both humor and irony in the paradox that philosophy’s answer to the question of how to create better lives is to be unselfish, when the greatest innovations in philosophy and the arts result from selfish motives.

Towards the end of “Book Second,” Nietzsche writes, “I should like the germ to become a tree,” adding, “[i]n order that a doctrine may become a tree, it must be believed in for a considerable period; in order that that it may be believed in it must be regarded as irrefutable” (79).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text