43 pages • 1 hour read
Natalie Savage CarlsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The theme of found families is often present in literature and typically applies to characters who lack traditional family structures. There are many reasons why a character may not have a “traditional” family—some characters may be orphaned, some may find themselves living far away from their families, some may be estranged or rejected by their families, and others may live on the margins of society. Found families consist of close, loving relationships between people who are not related. Often, these characters meet within the story, as is the case with Armand and the Calcets; other times, these characters are introduced with their bonds already established. In many cases, a “found family” fulfills the characters’ needs for belonging, love, and community. A found family can also enhance a character’s self-esteem and give them a sense of purpose.
Armand has no family of his own. In the earliest chapters, Armand takes pride in this, seeing the lack as a sign of his freedom to live life on his own terms. Having a family, to him, would mean being tied down to a single location and burdened with endless responsibilities. He claims to hate children, though Mireli, the woman who reads his fortune, suggests that Armand actually fears “the sly little things will steal [his] heart if they find out [he] has one” (5). This rings true in Armand’s first interaction with children. When young boys call him a “funny old tramp” (7), Armand initially threatens to tell Father Christmas about their behavior; one of the boys feels badly and offers Armand half of his apple, and Armand thinks, “Mireli was right. These starlings would steal your heart if you didn’t keep it well hidden” (7). Even such a small interaction has Armand feeling wary and defensive, suggesting that he is not truly averse to children—that, in fact, he knows he is quick to grow fond of them. Armand is more self-aware than he seems; he thinks about how “he [wants] nothing to do with children” because “they meant homes and responsibility and regular work—all the things he had turned his back on so long ago” (7-8). This bit of insight serves as foreshadowing for the events of the rest of the novel.
After Armand meets the Calcet children, they quickly begin to refer to him as their “grandfather.” This shows that the children are not bound to conventional, biological ideas of family. “Grandfather” is a title that Armand first receives with mixed reactions, showing the contradiction between his love for children and his desire for a solitary life. When Suzy suggests they could pretend Armand is their grandfather, Armand tells her that it’s one of the last things he would want to be, but he shares his food with them anyway. Later, when the children ask to go with Armand, he turns them down, but he quickly changes his mind. He cares for them like a grandparent, taking them to see Father Christmas, buying them treats, and otherwise keeping their spirits up. He storms off when Madame Calcet insults him, and although he quickly finds himself worrying about the children, he refuses to acknowledge his feelings, only allowing himself to go check on them by telling himself he wants to scold them.
It is only after he learns that the children are at risk of being taken away that he begins to accept his attachment to them. Knowing Madame Calcet wants to keep her children with her no matter what, Armand takes it upon himself to relocate the family, taking them to the Roma camp where he knows they will be safe. By the time the Calcets lose this shelter as well, Armand has grown so attached to the family that he fundamentally changes his life in order to help create a better one for them. He actively seeks out the “homes and responsibility and regular work” that he’d disparaged early in the narrative (7-8) and feels ashamed over his untethered lifestyle, which does not allow him to care for the children properly.
At first, Madame Calcet protests his plan, claiming that they “aren’t even related” (108). This sets her apart from the children and shows her rigid views and traditional mindset. The children protest, calling Armand “the only grandpa [they] have” (108); Armand himself challenges the dismissal, asking, “Do I have to beg for grandchildren?” (108). This is the clearest sign that Armand’s priorities have fully shifted to the family, just as Mireli forewarned. Madame Calcet’s refusal of help is the last barrier between the Calcets and Armand; once she gives in, he becomes a fully embraced member of the family.
At the conclusion of the story, Armand claims to Monsieur Brunot, his new employer, that he is a “family man”: “Oh, I’ve got a family all right [...] Three children and their mother. You should see my grandchildren. They would steal your heart away” (119). This claim helps Armand to get the job as it marks him as a responsible, ethical person in the eyes of Monsieur Brunot. It also expresses Armand’s changed views. Though he began the novel as a single, untethered man, Armand ends the story as grandpa to three. Despite the changes in his life that adopting the family will entail, Armand is pleased to do it. He found love, acceptance, and value in his relationships with Madame Calcet and the children. Though they are not blood related, the new family cares about each other deeply and works to help and support each other.
Armand faces a great deal of social stigma and discrimination due to his status as an unhoused man. The novel, published in 1958, contains outdated, offensive language and ideas about unhoused people, particularly in its comments by strangers. Armand himself seems to have a complex relationship with this stigma—he doesn’t recognize the slurs when they’re directed at him and responds to some children’s cry of “Look at the funny old tramp!” by looking around because he “[wants] to see the funny old tramp too” and only belatedly realizes the children are talking about him (6). Armand largely seems indifferent to or indignant about the stigma he faces, a state of mind that he attributes to releasing his sense of pride long ago.
Though Armand suffers from the social stigma of being unhoused, Madame Calcet and the children are fresh to the concept and struggle to reconcile their newly unhoused situation with their feelings of identity. Madame Calcet insists “[they] are not beggars” and credits her job at the laundry as an important distinction between the family’s situation and Armand’s (18). Throughout the novel, Madame Calcet must negotiate the tension between her feelings of disgust toward Armand and the kindness and help the old man offers them. She sees her situation as temporary but sees Armand’s lack of a home as defining him. She repeatedly calls him a “beggar” and accuses him of corrupting the children: “You have turned my children into beggars” (46). For Madame Calcet, the stigma of begging is so great that she cannot accept its benefits, which are, in this case, the food that Armand obtains for the children.
Another manifestation of this theme is the stigma and discrimination against the Roma people. Once again, Madame Calcet is a lens through which the stigma is exposed. She “[sobs] bitterly” when she discovers that Armand has found her family a temporary home among the Roma (71). She says, “To think we have fallen so low [...] my children at home with gypsies” (71). Armand challenges her depiction of the Roma as thieving and dishonest, instead calling them “kind and generous” and “expert craftsmen” who have a right to be “proud of their fine metalwork” (71). Armand also touches on the stigma when he claims that the children cannot go with the Roma people because of their coloring. He says, “How far do you think the gypsies would get with a redheaded child? People would think they had kidnapped you. The police would put you in some strange home and the gypsies in jail” (98). These statements align with the Roma’s response to the policeman who comes looking for Nikki—they are so accustomed to harassment and imprisonment that their immediate response to police attention is to pack up and move. It does not occur to them that the police could have good intentions, even though on this occasion the officer is attempting to return Nikki’s lost wallet.
Elements of this theme are prominent in the final chapters of the book. Once Madame Calcet agrees to accept Armand’s offer to find a job, she points out that Armand will have to change his appearance before he goes to the interview. As a man without a home, Armand has no way of regularly bathing, washing his clothes, or cutting his hair. Initially, Armand is fine with this, even though he garners negative attention when he treads into mainstream society. As someone whose circumstances have only recently changed, Madame Calcet has a fresh understanding of what will and won’t be deemed acceptable, and she takes it upon herself to transform Armand and make him look like the “family man” he is trying to become. Her efforts are effective: The floor manager who initially insulted Armand doesn’t recognize him when he comes to ask about the job interview, implying that Armand was never seen for himself, but only for his appearance and all the stigma attached to it.
The words of Madame Calcet, along with the responses Armand receives from others in public, demonstrate the stigma and social discrimination faced by people who are marginalized for their racial or economic standings.
The characters in The Family Under the Bridge exhibit a great deal of change over the course of a short period of time. Much of the change comes from Armand, who begins the novel as someone who avoids commitments and responsibility. By the end, Armand has transformed into a “family man” (119). The changes Armand undergoes throughout the narrative, both internal and external, make him an extremely dynamic character. Initially, Armand is a person who takes pride in his unfettered lifestyle and ability to take care of himself via the resources and routines available to him.
The first catalyst for change in Armand’s life is the moment he meets the Calcet children. Armand specifically decries children, calling them “witless, twittering, little pests” and claiming that he “can’t abide” them (5). However, once he meets the Calcets, he quickly goes against his own words. He makes the young family his concern, worrying about their health, safety, and feelings. More significantly, he takes responsibility for them, rapidly and radically changing his lifestyle in order to provide for them. This is seen in gradually increasing ways; Armand goes from entertaining the children for a day to finding them better shelter to fully sacrificing his lifestyle to care for them. The final catalyst for Armand’s change is Paul, the little Calcet boy who tries (and fails) to get a job to support his mother and siblings. Paul’s efforts inspire Armand to take over caring for the Calcets, even at the cost of his beloved freedom. In doing so, he grows from a person who avoids close relationships and responsibilities to someone who takes pride in having a job because it means he can provide for his family.
Another character who exhibits growth as a result of change is Madame Calcet. When the reader first meets Madame Calcet, she is understandably upset by her family’s change in circumstances—her husband has died, leaving her to raise and support three young children alone, with only her wages as a laundress to rely on. Despite being evicted, Madame Calcet maintains a strong sense of pride and insists that her circumstances are only temporary. She values keeping her family together above all else, but she fights against the assistance she is offered due to the shame she feels over finding herself impoverished.
At the story’s opening, Madame Calcet views others through a lens of judgment and stigma. This is seen in her early responses to Armand and the Roma people. She is very suspicious of Armand and forbids the children to have anything to do with him. She is similarly negative about the Roma people at first, suggesting that they are thieves and liars. As Armand and the Roma people show the Calcet family kindness and generosity, however, Madame Calcet’s perspective begins to change. At the same time, Madame Calcet realizes she has no choice but to relinquish her pride and accept the charity she is being offered. These two elements intertwine, and as she accepts Armand and the Roma people’s assistance (no matter how reluctantly), she comes to see and appreciate them for who they are. By the end of the book, she admires both Armand and the Roma people, and she is willing to put her pride aside for the sake of the children.
The change in Madame Calcet’s life inspires her to grow into a more accepting and empathetic person. After undergoing hardships and living on the margins herself, Madame Calcet’s view of the world is expanded and her perspective is fundamentally changed.