logo

52 pages 1 hour read

C. S. Lewis

The Discarded Image

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1964

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 8-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 8 Summary: “The Influence of the Model”

Content Warning: This section includes descriptions of racist attitudes and biases put forth by the author.

The final chapter explores just how prevalent the Model was in medieval writing. Sometimes, elements of the Model were added whether they fit with a work’s topic or not. For instance, the poet who wrote Sir Gawain and the Green Knight starts the narrative by explaining the history of the Trojan War and then tracing the Trojan lineage down to King Arthur. This is not a useless aside; instead, it reinforces the Model, affirms popular beliefs about inheriting classical cultures, and links Gawain to a much broader literary tradition. Many other works uphold the model by including catalogs of objects. People’s literary tastes were very different in the Medieval Era; they were rather “like Professor Tolkien’s Hobbits” (142) in their love of order and predictability. Instead of constantly searching for novelty and originality, readers prized works that felt familiar, told well-loved stories, and reminded them of things they already knew. 

Literature of this time tends to be repetitive because the standard education in Rhetoric advised writers to include digressions and delays in their work. The Model was constantly replicated in the medieval world, from artwork and church architecture to literature. It was a Model that people genuinely loved to contemplate, and this contemplation helped to bolster and affirm Christian religious beliefs. Lewis compares this love of the Model to other cultures that he deems “savage,” but he claims that the two are actually inverse. He states that while medieval people represented the Model everywhere in deference to and celebration of religious authority and hierarchy, “savage” people might shake a rain stick in imitation of (and in hopes of generating) rain. He contends that depictions of the Model in literature and art were an act of love and a way to understand where medieval people fit into a broader picture of the universe.

Lewis also asserts that the common use of the Model is to blame for medieval literature’s “most typical vice and its most typical virtue” (145). The worst thing about medieval literature, in Lewis’s view, is that it can be extremely dull. While this can be tough on readers, it has its own loveliness. These writers might spend an interminable time on lengthy, repetitive passages because they genuinely believe that the story they are telling is so transcendent that it is always worth telling. The other side of this coin, medieval literature’s greatest virtue, is that it has an easy flow that almost makes the poet disappear and lets the reader spend unhurried time lingering inside a story. Medieval literature will often take the time to describe seemingly insignificant details that provide a rich texture, like the quality of a character’s blush or the way they look around a room.

Works of medieval literature are palimpsests in that writers almost never developed wholly original ideas; instead, they built upon, referenced, translated, copied, or otherwise connected their thoughts to the works of earlier writers. To do otherwise might have been seen as a failure, because it would have meant that a writer was failing to engage with what were widely considered to be the greatest stories ever told. Unlike modern people, medieval writers had virtually no conception of plagiarism, let alone any sense that copying was in any way bad. There was also only a vague sense of the distinction between fiction and nonfiction, or between history, storytelling, and pure invention. Allegedly, people sometimes “pointed out Dante in the street not as the man who made the Comedy but as the man who had been in Hell” (150), though whether or not people literally believed this to be true remains debatable. Writers tended to place the burden of truth on whichever writers came before them, and they tended to see their own works and the works of previous authors as more deserving of fame than themselves. Today, writers are often more famous than their works, which Lewis thinks may be evidence of an unhappy trend toward individualism and shallowness in human societies.

Epilogue Summary

Lewis believes the Medieval Model to be beautiful and influential, but he admits that it is not a true representation of the universe. However, he stresses that it had its advantages for medieval people; it was easy to understand and easy to represent visually, unlike the increasingly abstract physics at the heart of contemporary astronomy. Lewis finds this shift toward abstraction to be frustrating and troubling. Over time, new facts were discovered about the universe, causing the Medieval Model to fall out of favor and be replaced by an increasingly refined version of the heliocentric, empirical model used today. However, it was not just the emergence of new scientific knowledge that caused the shift in the Model. New knowledge was necessary, but so was a cultural shift in how people wanted to understand the universe. 

In the Medieval Era, people believed that the perfect preceded the imperfect: that humans came from God and were a fallen, imperfect version of God’s image. Later, people became more comfortable with the idea that the rudimentary could precede the sophisticated, and it was into this milieu that Darwin introduced his theory of evolution by natural selection. Lewis does not deny that Darwin’s theory is accurate, but he does suggest that all ideas have their time, and that they are more likely to arise and to be accepted in certain ages over others. He asserts that any age’s Model of the universe will necessarily be only a fraction of the whole truth, in accordance with that age’s common preferences, beliefs, and values.

Chapter 8-Epilogue Analysis

In another contradictory argument, Lewis notes in Chapter 7 that when people praised poetry, they would praise the rhetoric, or the form of the poem. In Chapter 8, however, he claims that medieval writers thought their stories were so delightful that they deserved to be told even if they were told badly. In other words, Lewis is now claiming that the content, not the form, is most important in the medieval mind, but he never acknowledges this contradiction.

When describing the importance of the Model, Lewis once again makes many inherently racist assumptions about so-called “savage” cultures. He gives a truncated description of what he believes rainmaking rituals consist of and how he guesses those who engage in them might be interacting with the divine. By oversimplifying rainmaking traditions (which exist in various cultures all over the world), Lewis is dismissing cultural phenomena as superstitious and ignorant instead of engaging meaningfully with them on their own terms. Ironically, it is exactly this kind of dismissal that he is trying to discourage among students of medieval literature who fail to take cultural context into account and instead make snap judgments. In a further irony, there was a rainmaking ritual called the aquaelicium that was practiced in ancient Rome, one of the cultures that Lewis upholds as an example of the highest, most sophisticated human civilizations.

Almost all medieval texts show the prevalence of Classical Influence on the Medieval Model. For example, the writer of Gawain traces Arthur’s lineage all the way back to Troy, once again affirming that western Europeans in general and British people in particular have inherited—intellectually and perhaps genetically—the cultures of ancient Greece and Rome. Lewis has already traced how classical influences helped to build the Model, with people taking ideas from many different contradictory writers and combining them to make a cohesive whole. Medieval people came to regard the Model as being so beautiful and perfect that it was worth admiring for its own sake. This admiration became a unifying gaze, and people during this time frame regarded the Model as a perfect explanation of the universe instead of a patchwork of ideas drawn together from disparate and often conflicting writers. It is only with long-term cultural establishment that the Model became the apparently perfect and satisfying view of the universe that appears in so much medieval literature.

It is also important to note Lewis’s contention that the Model was a profound source of comfort in medieval literature, particularly because of its reliance on The Prevalence of Hierarchy and Order. Such medieval works often included long detailed catalogs of objects; by contrast, few modern texts have such lists. Hierarchy in literature told readers where they were in the universe, creating a soothing effect by reiterating what readers of the time already knew. Thus, there was little sense that literature should be challenging or shocking. As Lewis explains, this extreme reliance on order in writing can make the reading experience itself rather dull, but it can also bring delight. From the medieval perspective, if the world were aligned in perfect order according to God’s will, there may have been little room for surprise or novelty, but there was also little room for that which was disturbing, unexpected, or inexplicable.

It can be challenging for modern students to fully internalize this Medieval Relationship to Literature, for almost everything that is considered valuable or necessary in modern literature is absent or inverted in the medieval canon. Today, bookstores and libraries are neatly divided between fiction and non-fiction, whereas among medieval writers, truth was not even an isolated or important concept. Writing an original work was not merely unnecessary; it was genuinely bad. Comfort and predictability reigned supreme in medieval literature: Everything built on (and stole from) everything else. Through these norms, medieval literature became a way to uphold the status quo, and with The Discarded Image, Lewis endeavors to bring these stark cultural differences to light in order to aid modern students of medieval literature in better understanding these texts. While there were writers in the Medieval Era who were pushing boundaries and creating radical texts—Chaucer’s decision to write in Middle English is a good example—this radicalism was an almost unintended side effect of an otherwise highly systematized and conformist literary era.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text