logo

64 pages 2 hours read

Valerie Bauerlein

The Devil at His Elbow: Alex Murdaugh and the Fall of a Southern Dynasty

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Corrupting Influence of Family Legacy and Power

For over 100 years, the Murdaugh family held sway over Hampton County due to the far-reaching power of their legal influence. Bauerlein investigates how this power corrupted generations of Murdaugh men and examines the ways in which their power decayed the county’s ability to progress. Each generation of Murdaughs intensified the power of the generation before, leading the newer generations—Alex and Paul—to feel entitled to the access and respect that their ancestors had built. As solicitors, the Murdaughs felt like they were not just above the law, but that they “were the law” (147), and they repeatedly abused and exploited the law for their own personal gain. For example, Alex frequently used his grandfather’s solicitor’s badge and had “convinced himself that it was all he needed” (20) to reap advantageous treatment from law enforcement, even though he never held the position of solicitor himself. Alex had an honorary badge, which Bauerlein highlights was simply a signifier of power, not something that Alex worked to achieve. As an extreme example of this entitlement, Paul wasn’t even interested in pursuing a career in law, but he regularly weaponized his grandfather’s position to get out of trouble.

Once the Murdaughs achieved this level of power, Bauerlein illustrates that their behaviors quickly became criminal. Randolph Sr. began his solicitor’s tenure on a platform of “being square and giving everyone a clean deal at all times” (41), but when his power was threatened during the Depression’s days of scarcity, he quickly turned on the Hampton population and abused the legal system for his own gain. His last act in life—suicide by train—was done to ensure that his son could “have the money and the title and the influence to build an empire” (47). Buster Murdaugh was investigated by three different federal and state bodies for his “grossly unethical” (76) activity, from embezzlement to attempted murder. Bauerlein claims that Buster fixed juries and threatened witnesses so that he could hold onto his position of power in Hampton. By detailing Alex’s continued nefarious behavior while in prison, Bauerlein demonstrates how thoroughly Alex’s life of power corrupted him. Alex ran a financial scam by padding various inmates’ commissary accounts with his family’s money, then transferring that money to himself. In the epilogue, Bauerlein implies that Alex continues to run these kinds of scams because he knows no other way to recreate the power that he held in his life of freedom.

Bauerlein argues that the Murdaughs’ legacy and unscrupulous misuse of power had disastrous effects upon Hampton County. Most notably, the Murdaugh law firm became the county’s major money-maker by virtue of the large payouts that they received for personal injury settlements. The private practice persuaded townsfolk to see the family as benefactors, but locals also “took pride in the Murdaughs’ historic monopoly of the office [of solicitor]” (19), which gave the county itself greater power in the region. Bauerlein explains that the Murdaughs’ aggressive tactics impeded economic growth, given that corporations didn’t open new businesses out of fear of being sued. Bauerlein also describes Hampton County as rural and poor with terrible infrastructure that its tax-base couldn’t afford to maintain. She compares Hampton to the nearby Beaufort County, which was out of the Murdaughs’ direct reach, and depicts Beaufort as progressive and modern, with a viable economy and growing businesses. Bauerlein proposes that the Murdaughs’ legacy of being benevolent saviors was a mirage and in reality, the family became a collective, malignant presence that sought enrichment at the expense of others.

Impediments to Justice in Close-Knit Communities

This narrative of Alex’s life and trial explores the many ways in which communities like Hampton County and the 14th Judicial Circuit—communities with small, relatively unchanging populations—create major issues of bias when investigating and trying criminal cases. Throughout Alex’s various cases, detectives’ main concerns were focused on the conflicts of interest during the investigative stages. The Murdaughs knew every law enforcement officer in the 14th Circuit on both professional and personal levels. Alex was known for cultivating relationships with law enforcement, since the same families “had worked with Alex’s father or, better yet, his grandfather” (18). Alex could call in favors from these officers, and he could easily manipulate their indebtedness or closeness to him or his family. Bauerlein suggests that these elements of corruption were at play in Paul’s boat crash case, given that the responding officer—the son of a close family friend—didn’t make Paul do a field sobriety test. Friends of Alex’s who later arrived at Maggie and Paul’s murder scene also willingly contaminated the bodies to protect the family’s honor. In both cases, the investigations were compromised by those who acted in Alex’s best interests rather than behaving impartially.

Conflicts of interest also threatened the judicial proceedings for Maggie and Paul’s murders, and Bauerlein indicates the difficult circumstances of jury selection in Colleton County through the number of unique measures implemented to ensure fairness. For one, the clerk had to send out 900 summonses—nearly one summons for every 20 eligible people in the county—so that the court could have a large enough pool to eliminate from. The judge knew that the closeness of the community meant that most people would likely be eliminated due to conflicts of interest. Bauerlein shows that in reality, this fact far exceeded the judge’s belief, to the point that all 900 people would have to be cut due to some connection with the Murdaughs. Instead of starting from scratch, the judge discerned “how close was too close” (302), allowing some knowledge of Alex, but no direct or second-degree connection with him or his family. In other examples, Bauerlein showed that, as a lawyer, Alex used this closeness again for his benefit, since he could offer favors to potential jurors or their families in exchange for sympathetic verdicts. This practice was so common that during the murder trial, Beverly Cook was sure Alex tampered with the jury and would be acquitted.

However, Maggie and Paul’s case eventually evaded this bias. The murders and the unravelling of Alex’s complex life drew massive attention across the United States, and people with no connection whatsoever to Alex saw past his charm and manipulations. Social media backlash was influential in stripping Alex of his special privileges, such as his proximity to his onlooking family and his ability to order lunch from the jurors’ catering menu. The main investigators in the cases were also decidedly “from outside Hampton County” (135)—like Mark Tinsley, David Owens, and Creighton Waters—which helped them to perceive Alex’s lies. Bauerlein also shows that even those closest to Alex overcame the pull of loyalty due to their strong sense of morality. People like Shelley Smith, Marian Proctor, and Blanca all testified against Alex, even at the cost of becoming isolated from their family and friends.

The Construction and Maintenance of Self-Image

Throughout his life, Alex strived to project an outward image of affluence so that he could continue to conceal the darker, messier aspects of his life from the public—as well as from his close friends and family. Bauerlein depicts Alex’s constructed self-image as his “good-old-boy routine” (156). He would often put on an air of confidence and charm, and he could befriend anyone in a room if the situation demanded it. He portrayed himself as a “man of the people” (16) who funded community events and coached Little League teams. Alex’s outward performance was so convincing that his closest friends and associates never knew that he had a decades-long oxycodone addiction that he spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to maintain. This act also allowed Alex to hide his extreme taste for alcohol and his extramarital affairs.

Bauerlein shows that Alex’s determination to maintain his positive public image was a major motive behind his criminal acts. To preserve his lavish lifestyle, Alex started stealing from his clients and eventually from his friends. Alex also hid the state of the family’s finances from his wife Maggie, who became paranoid that Alex’s evasions of financial discussions concealed something disturbing. Despite stealing from his clients, Alex used his confident and smooth exterior to create a false sense of trust with them, and his performance was so successful that some clients, such as Pamela Pinckney, even hired Alex for other cases while he was actively embezzling their settlement funds. As Alex’s life started unravelling and investigators came closer to uncovering his crimes, Alex took increasingly drastic measures to preserve his reputation. In fact, Tinsley argued that Alex killed Maggie and Paul to evade charges in his financial crimes, knowing that “no jury […] would return a verdict against a man whose wife and son had been murdered” (222). The roadside shooting thus became yet another attempt to portray himself as a victim; this event occurred not long after his law partners and best friends discovered that he was stealing from them. Ultimately, all of Alex’s actions were motivated by a need to appear both successful and innocent.

Alex wasn’t the only Murdaugh who portrayed life as better than it was; Bauerlein shows that Maggie Murdaugh also “tried to project stability” (174) while her life spiraled out of her control. Specifically, Maggie concealed her worries about Alex and Paul’s erratic behaviors behind smiling photos, portraying the family as close and happy when in reality, they were fracturing and living apart. Bauerlein supposes that Maggie “made her world small” (174) during Paul and Alex’s investigations because she wanted to hide how dire the situation really was. To combat her inability to control the unravelling of her family life, Maggie spent her time keeping up her personal appearance through shopping and pampering. Although Maggie tried to ignore the gossip about her husband and son, Bauerlein reveals that she was depressed, isolated, and paranoid.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text