64 pages • 2 hours read
Valerie BauerleinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
At the defense’s urging, the jurors went to Moselle to see the crime scene, though Bauerlein explains that this plan backfired. The jurors walked around the property, checking areas of the kennels to which the trial referred. Each juror spent time solemnly standing where Paul and Maggie had been shot. They walked to the vacant house and saw reminders of the family that once lived there. Bauerlein shares that everyone who visited Moselle felt the “heaviness” of the crimes in the atmosphere.
Chapter 44 recounts the prosecution and defense’s closing arguments. Waters reiterated that Alex’s deceptive behavior went unchecked for so long that the first sign of threat during the boat case pushed Alex to an extreme act of self-preservation. Waters then stressed Alex’s motives and his deflective behavior during the investigation. He concluded by showing pictures of Maggie and Paul from their lives and from the crime scene, in order to highlight Alex’s brutality.
Judge Newman made the defense choose only one lawyer to give the closing speech. The less experienced Jim Griffin spoke, focusing on the incompleteness of the state’s case. Griffin played the kennel video one last time, claiming that it showed a loving relationship between Alex and his family. Griffin teared up, pressing the jury not to make Alex’s family tragedy worse.
During a bathroom break, Mark Tinsley gave advice to the prosecution. The prosecution received the last word, and John Meadors emphasized Alex’s manipulative behavior, especially when compared to the witnesses’ genuine emotions. Meadors expressed his disgust at the attack on law enforcement, and he requested that the jury finally hold Alex accountable.
Before deliberations, Judge Newman investigated rumors of jurors breaking the rules. One juror had publicly shared opinions about the case, and Judge Newman removed her. Her dismissal was a blow to the defense, as Harpootlian believed that she was sympathetic to Alex. Judge Newman appointed an alternate juror.
The jurors started their deliberation with a prayer, and Bauerlein describes the close relationships that the group developed during the trial. After their first inconclusive vote, the jurors revisited evidence and testimonies. The jurors considered the defense’s claims against SLED and determined that investigators did the best they could with the information they had at the time, given that they did not yet know about Alex’s other crimes. The jury spent a lot of time considering Alex’s testimony, and the more they deliberated, the closer they came to a consensus about his guilt.
The court clerk delivered the jury’s unanimous guilty verdict for Alex’s murder charges. Renee Beach, Anthony and Beverly Cook, and Tony Satterfield all watched the verdict reading from home. Blanca didn’t learn of the verdict until the next day. The bailiff handcuffed Alex and took him back to jail. The prosecution exalted the power of justice to reporters outside the courthouse, and the defense team refused to comment.
At the sentencing, Judge Newman spoke directly to Alex. He recalled Alex’s family history of upholding the law and shared his distaste for Alex’s manipulation of the justice system. Judge Newman sentenced Alex to life in prison, though many people thought he might recommend the death penalty. Phillip Beach attended the sentencing, seeing the guilty verdict as justice for his daughter. Mark Tinsley visited Judge Newman’s chambers to thank him, passing a weeping John Meadors on the way. Bauerlein describes Tinsley’s own outpouring of tears in the judge’s chambers. Tinsley felt responsible for Maggie and Paul’s deaths because he had put so much pressure on Alex. Judge Newman assured Tinsley that only Alex was to blame for the tragedy.
To describe Alex’s life after the trial, Bauerlein uses an analogy of a spider being taken from its web. Like the spider, Alex’s power diminished when he was no longer on his home turf. Bauerlein’s narrative jumps forward nine months to another sentencing, this time for Alex’s financial crimes. Judge Newman sentenced Alex to 27 years in prison without the possibility of appeal—a plea deal that his lawyers and the prosecution worked out. Investigators continued to pursue other cases, like the deaths of Stephen Smith and Gloria Satterfield, and Alex’s defense sought a new trial for the murders. Bauerlein describes the burst of celebrity given to the prosecution and the defense lawyers, and particularly to Judge Newman.
At the hearing, Waters reiterated his dedication to helping Hampton County rid itself of the Murdaughs’ influence. Alex’s victims read impact statements, and Mark Tinsley took the stand, criticizing Alex’s narcissism. Alex apologized to his victims and family, while also criticizing SLED. Bauerlein describes multiple negative reactions to Alex’s lengthy statement. Alex returned to McCormick Correctional Institution, where Bauerlein asserts that he continues to manipulate others in order to receive special treatment.
At the conclusion of the case and the book, Bauerlein again highlights the reactions of those around Alex, rather than focusing on Alex himself. Many investigators involved in the case broke down in tears after the guilty verdict—like David Owens and John Meadors—because of how much time and effort they put into seeking justice for Maggie and Paul. Waters exemplified the exhaustion that pervaded the six-week trial, which had been “like waging a war” (387. Bauerlein also highlights Mark Tinsley’s reaction to the verdict, which closes the main section of the narrative. Tinsley tears up in Judge Newman’s chambers both because of his relief and his anxiety that he inadvertently caused Alex to commit the murders. She uses this anecdote both to emphasize the emotional toll of the investigation on everyone involved and to emphasize that only Alex is to blame for his actions. Bauerlein also shows the reactions of Alex’s victims, like Tony Satterfield and the Beaches, to underscore that the outcome of this case has delivered a proxy form of justice for all the other unsolved cases in Alex’s life.
In this final section, the recurring symbol of Moselle suddenly shifts its meaning in a deeply ominous fashion. Whereas the property once represented the peak of Alex’s wealth and power, it now represented his demise and the violence of his life, emphasizing that The Construction and Maintenance of Self-Image had come crashing down. Bauerlein also draws attention to the ways in which Moselle physically changed after the murders, using images of neglect to imply that the family’s legacy now lies in similar ruins. As the narrative states, “The black mailbox at the head of the driveway was covered in spiderwebs and topped by a No Trespassing sign. The caretaker’s cabin appeared deserted, the shrubs out front bushy and overgrown” (382). Although little reminders of the Murdaughs’ once vibrant life remained, like Maggie’s green bike, the whole property nonetheless exuded an air of “heaviness” in the wake of the murders. Jurors, news witnesses, and court officials visited the property before the deliberation, and Bauerlein explains that this plan backfired primarily because of how overwhelming the memory of the murders was at the property. She relates that the visit “brought out visceral responses that were not available in the cold courtroom” (384), and these responses of dread ultimately damaged Alex’s case.
Bauerlein also indicates that despite being convicted and sentenced for the murders and for dozens of financial crimes, Alex did not cease his manipulative behaviors when he went to prison. The Epilogue therefore emphasizes The Corrupting Influence of Family Legacy and Power by showing that Alex was so spoiled by his life of privilege that he tried to recreate this power in prison, becoming “the master of another small world” (414). Alex continued to use his charm to manipulate guards and inmates alike in order to obtain special treatment and privileges, such as replenishments to his commissary accounts or access to working technology. Alex also used his legal skills to help other inmates draft appeal documents, but Bauerlein implies that these acts were far from altruistic. By relating these anecdotes about Alex’s new life, Bauerlein endeavors to prove that he was utterly remorseless about his crimes, for rather than reflecting on the manipulative actions that landed him in prison, Alex continued down the same destructive path, clinging to any form of power he could find, even in his diminished circumstances.