logo

77 pages 2 hours read

G. Edward Griffin

The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1994

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “The New Alchemy”

Part 3, Chapter 11 Summary: “The Rothschild Formula”

Content Warning: This section includes discussion of antisemitic conspiracy theories.

In this section, Griffin recounts antisemitic conspiracy theories that claim that the Rothschild family came to be massively influential in Europe’s political circles due to their control of the banking industry. He repeats several discredited theories about the roles of central banks and loans in England’s campaign against Napoleon and how that paved the way for the Rothschilds to become indispensable to England.

Griffin argues that the Rothschilds and those like them crafted a strategy to make sure governments stay in debt to support financiers. He calls this plan “The Rothschild Formula.” This formula is based on a set of conclusions that could be reached by a man motivated primarily by self-interest and an awareness that government debt benefits the financial sector: that war encourages government debt because a government at war will do anything to ensure victory and avoid destruction; and that perpetual war or threat of war maintains government debt and financial supremacy to top bankers. According to Griffin’s theory, to make sure of the threat of war, financiers can fund both sides of the conflict. Only in the case that a nation refuses to operate on debt is one side allowed a decisive victory. Whether or not that formula was ever actively developed, articulated, or consciously followed, Griffin argues that the principle is clearly in play when examining European history.

Part 3, Chapter 12 Summary: “Sink the Lusitania!”

Moving into the 20th century, Griffin explores the financial motivations at play in World War I. J.P. Morgan was the primary source of loans as well as the primary benefactor of munitions sales from the US to European allies. The Morgan group, headed by J.P. Morgan, loaned England and France a total of $1.5 billion over the course of the war. Griffin contends that a few years into the war, German submarines were devastating English ships and cutting off trade and supply lines to England, meaning that the Morgan Group was facing the possibility of a complete loss on the loans they had made so far. Therefore, they encouraged the US to enter the war, both to increase the likelihood of an Allied victory and therefore interest payments on the loans, and for the US to be able to give direct funding to the Allies.

E.M. House, a close advisor of Woodrow Wilson, traveled to England and negotiated a secret treaty: that the US would spearhead peace talks with specific conditions, and if either side refused the US would enter the war on the opposing side. The public’s opposition to the war delayed Wilson and House’s plan to enter the war surreptitiously. Wilson had to run for re-election on an anti-war platform. Germany announced plans for more U-boats, sparking concern for the Morgan House. The Morgan House and the Rockefellers controlled, either outright or through advertising revenue, a huge proportion of the press in the US. Using that control, they created a press campaign designed to inspire the American people to support joining the war against the Germans.

In addition to banking and other industries, Morgan also had an international shipping trust which included two major shipping lines in England. Cunard, who built the Mauretania and Lusitania, was his direct competition. Cunard was retained by the British government to build ships for the military in addition to its profitable shipping and passenger business. The Lusitania was a luxury liner that primarily transported passengers between New York and London. However, the ship was built with the potential to be a warship. In 1913, the ship was outfitted with armor and space for ammunition and weapons. From that point, it carried passengers and war materials from the United States to England.

Griffin argues, based primarily on Churchill’s speeches at the time and the orders he gave the British navy, that Winston Churchill intentionally created the situation that led to the German attack on the Lusitania. On May 1, 1915, the Lusitania was sunk by a German U-boat’s torpedo, followed by an internal explosion likely caused by the munitions being secretly transported from the US to Britain. American citizens died in the disaster, and Griffin argues that the Lusitania was intentionally placed in danger to increase public support for the US entering the war.

Public support allowed Wilson to pressure Congress into declaring war on Germany. Once war was declared, Congress approved a $1 billion loan to the Allies, much of which returned to J.P. Morgan as interest payments. Three months later, Morgan House requested $400 million from the government, which Griffin claims was furnished quietly via the Federal Reserve.

Part 3, Chapter 13 Summary: “Masquerade in Moscow”

Griffin argues that the Bolshevik Revolution was largely planned and funded by financiers from the US, Germany, and Britain. He asserts that Leon Trotsky was likely aided by various influential American and British sources. After being detained on his return to Russia from the US, he was surprisingly released due to pressure from Britain and America. There is also evidence that Trotsky was bankrolled by prominent wealthy British financier Lord Alfred Milner at a time when that could have been seen as treason.

Milner was the head of a secret society, the Round Table Group, founded by Cecil Rhodes (of Rhodes Scholar fame). The goal of the society, according to Griffin, was to preserve and extend the British Empire. Griffin argues that this society created front organizations, notably the Institute of International Affairs in England and the CFR in America. Milner bankrolled British agents in Russia to encourage revolutionary activity. These funds came into Russia through British Ambassador to Russia Sir George Buchanan. American agents came into Russia under the guise of the Red Cross which had become beholden to New York bankers including J.P. Morgan.

The Red Cross Russian mission was headed by William Boyce Thompson, who, among other things, had served as full-time director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The mission was ostensibly to support the Tsar, then to support the anti-German Mensheviks, and then to create sufficient goodwill with the Bolsheviks to prevent Russia from pulling out of the alliance with Britain and the US. However, each side was funded by the same small group of people. Griffin argues that Morgan, Milner, and the others were all part of the Round Table Group funding both sides of the conflict to maximize their own profit and power. In his closing summary, Griffin asserts that the CFR is “even more powerful than the federal government” because its members make up a large portion of the government (273).

Part 3, Chapter 14 Summary: “The Best Enemy Money Can Buy”

Griffin asserts that the financiers of Wall Street supported the Bolsheviks from the start and intended for them to come to power. The goal was to gain control of Russia’s resources and to establish a political and financial foothold in Russia.

According to Griffin, many American and British companies profited in the wake of the Bolshevik coup d’état. Most industry and banking were nationalized, except for those owned by Rockefeller and Crane, both instrumental in the finance world. Russia’s gold was used to repay loans from British and American financial companies. Two different massive sales and shipments of food from the US to Russia directly benefitted family members of Red Cross Mission participants and US financiers. Resource mining produced wealth for Britain, Germany, and the US both through gaining the resources themselves and selling Russia the machinery to accomplish the mining.

During WWII, Griffin claims, a major German firm, I.G. Farben, was largely funded by American banks owned by the Morgan House, the Rockefellers, and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. During strategic bombing by the US, Farben’s buildings were spared. Also, during WWII, the US gave the Soviets money, equipment, and even uranium. This was all under the auspice of the Lend-Lease program which continued a full year after the end of the war.

Griffin gives more examples of US banks, the IMF, and the US government directly giving money and goods to communist-controlled countries with human rights violations. These loans primarily serve the Wall Street elite. Although these money and goods are supposedly in service of free trade and international movements toward world peace, Griffin points out that as of the late 1990s, the world is embroiled in small conflicts.

Griffin closes by claiming that world leaders are actively implementing the Rothschild Formula to use war to generate debt in the late 20th century. The weapons and infrastructure that allowed the Korean and Vietnam wars, Griffin argues, were supplied in large part by US sales and loans to the Soviets. Likewise, loans to China and Russia funnel into the Middle East, funding Saddam Hussein’s regime which was actively propped up by the US until Hussein tried to regain control of oil resources in the 1990s. His final point is that North Korea’s nuclear threat came from the direct support of Russia and China, both of which were funded in large part by the US.

Griffin closes with his fifth reason to abolish the Federal Reserve System: The System actively encourages war.

Part 3 Analysis

In Part 3, Griffin connects The Relationship Between War and Finance to The Effect of Finance on Politics in order to question The Moral Implications of Fractional Reserve and Central Banking. Griffin asserts that many wars are started and resolved by the machinations of central banks and bankers. If that assertion is true, it suggests that the real mechanisms of war are financial rather than political in nature. If wars are primarily driven by profit motives, then banks and financiers have significant motivation to influence policy regarding war. If institutions like the Fed and the Bank of England are acting to perpetuate war, then the financial system is so corrupt as to actively seek violence—a clearly immoral act. In his discussion of war’s connection to finance, Griffin brings together his three major themes to build his foundational argument.

Griffin’s foundational arguments, however, are rooted in a great deal of misleading, unreliable, or discredited information. The story of the Rothschild’s rise to financial and political power demonstrates the way Griffin blends historical fact with long-discredited conspiracy theories to make his case for The Relationship Between War and Finance in the modern world. Griffin is correct to point out that several of the world’s most prominent banking entities, including the Rothschilds and the Morgan Group, have been closely involved in the biggest armed conflicts of the 19th and 20th centuries. It is true that the Rothschild family financially supported the UK in the Napoleonic Wars, and that J.P. Morgan and his companies were provided key financing to the UK, France, and the US throughout WWI. It is also true that both groups profited from their associations with the governments; and it is true that many major corporations—including those associated with those banking groups—continue to derive profit from armed conflict.

However, Griffin’s argument that the Rothschilds established, by accident or design, a formula to perpetuate and profit from war derives from an antisemitic conspiracy theory first circulated in France in the 1840s. Authored by a “left-wing controversialist called Georges Dairnvaell, who made no attempt to hide his loathing for Jews—and the Rothschilds in particular,” the pamphlet relied on fabrications and “derogatory racial stereotype[s]” and gained popularity at “a moment when [antisemitic] attitudes were having one of their periodic surges of popularity in Europe” (Cathcart, Brian. “The Rothschild Libel: Why has it taken 200 years for an anti-Semitic slur that emerged from the Battle of Waterloo to be dismissed?The Independent, 3 May 2015). Since then, conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds and secret cabals of (often Jewish) bankers controlling the world have grown. Griffin incorporates several of these related conspiracy theories in this section to support his arguments. His claim that the Lusitania was deliberately sunk with Winston Churchill’s help for the Morgan Group’s profit, for instance, has been debunked (“Sinking RMS Lusitania: A Long-Lived Conspiracy Theory.” The Churchill Project, Hillsdale College, 24 Sep 2020). Some historians even argue that it would have been impossible to arrange the sinking even if Churchill or others had wanted to (“Conspiracy or Foul-Up?The Lusitania Resource).

Other aspects of Griffin’s argument for his fifth “law” that central banking and the Fed encourage war are based on misrepresentations of fact or pure fabrication. E.M. House was Woodrow Wilson’s chief peace negotiator both during and after WWI, but Griffin’s claims that he played both sides of the war against each other to force the US into the war misrepresents both the content and the outcome of the Grey-House Memorandum of 1916. Griffin’s claims that the Bolshevik revolution was secretly masterminded by a secret society of which Morgan was a member to benefit bankers is an element of the New World Order conspiracy theory—which also has roots in other antisemitic conspiracy theories—while the claims that the US bankrolled China and the USSR in the conflicts in Korea and Vietnam to enrich a secret group of bankers have no basis. Thus, though Griffin is right to point toward the questionable ethics of connections between private, for-profit companies and international relations throughout history, his specific arguments perpetuate disinformation and harmful, antisemitic conspiracies and stereotypes.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text