40 pages • 1 hour read
Joel BakanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
When it becomes clear in the late 1600s that partnerships cannot raise the kind of funding needed by the growing businesses of the post-Renaissance era, the concept of the corporation attracts interest. A corporation is owned by its shareholders, and the number of possible investors is unlimited, allowing such a firm to raise huge amounts of capital.
A chief problem faced by corporations is trust: Investors can’t be sure the managers won’t spend capital on unrelated or frivolous things. Worse, the corporation could take actions that cause harm, and resulting lawsuits might bankrupt investors. To remedy these concerns, laws are passed to limit the liability of investors as well as upper management; the corporation and its assets become the property at risk. Corporate officers are also held to a strict standard: Their activities must always and only be directed toward the financial benefit of the investors.
With these stipulations in place, corporations grow wildly; today they constitute a large percentage of worldwide economic activity. Unfortunately, those same stipulations—limited liability and activities directly solely toward profit—cause corporations to make decisions and take actions that can cause harm to others. These “externalities” are a chief issue of complaint among modern activists who deplore the sweatshops, pollution, manipulative marketing, and dangerous products that emerge from the corporate obsession with the bottom line.
By law, corporations must focus exclusively on bringing profit to their investors; any other activity, if it cannot be justified as a cost, is forbidden. This puts the focus squarely on the bottom line. Any person so obsessed would be defined as antisocial, and any person who has no scruples about harming others in the quest for money would be termed psychopathic. In this way, corporations exhibit sociopathic tendencies.
A psychopath is someone who bends others toward giving what they normally would not turn over. The psychopath will use charm, manipulation, threats, lies, or whatever else can help achieve the end of acquiring other people’s money or property.
Corporate investors, board members, and officers have limited liability. Thus crimes committed by corporations often cannot be pinned on anyone in particular beyond the “person” of the corporation itself. Since a corporation often employs tens or hundreds of thousands of workers, and because consumers rely on its products, regulators are reluctant to impose penalties severe enough to inflict major losses on the corporation.
The result is that, in situations where a human psychopath might suffer arrest and imprisonment, a corporation can run free, limited only by costs imposed on it through lawsuits or public disapproval. Where an intelligent antisocial criminal might find ways to avoid the costs of his misbehaviors, a corporation can more easily escape its responsibilities by thinking and acting like a psychopath.
If a psychopath’s excesses earn condemnation from his neighbors, he may commence a campaign of false contrition, apologizing to the offended, insisting his actions are innocent mistakes, and otherwise charming others into accepting him back into their good graces. At this point, the psychopath can quietly resume his covert efforts to steal from or otherwise harm his targets.
Likewise, a corporation that gets caught misbehaving might launch a publicity campaign that portrays it in a beneficent light, as if it were simply a good citizen who made some honest errors. This campaign will continue until citizens buy into it or forget about the offenses. At that point, the corporation may very well return to its old habits.
Because corporations are legally required to do only that which improves profitability, and because psychopathic behavior can pay off handsomely, sometimes corporations are effectively driven to behave badly. This quirk in the system means that corporations, when called to task, will always protest that they are socially responsible whether they mean it or not. Thus it is irrelevant to ask whether a corporation has reformed; it has done what it needs to do to stay profitable; reforming is moot.
With the growth in privatization and the loosening of government business regulations, corporations are expanding ever more deeply into public domains previously considered sacrosanct. It’s no longer a surprise to see corporate ads and logos in parklands, schools, and city plazas. Sidewalks and tunnels once maintained by governments are now owned and operated by companies that blast commercials into those spaces and employ guards to keep out people considered undesirable.
Local governments have traditionally maintained communities and streets, where citizens could enter and leave freely, but the recent growth of gated communities puts limits on that standard. Increasingly, a person may not enter a neighborhood without an appointment or some other acceptable reason to be there.
These trends have the effect of restricting speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of entry, and they establish the precedent that only the middle class and above may participate in public spaces. With relatively free rein to market, own, and control large swaths of communities, corporations tend to dominate their societies. This enables corporations to lure people into becoming more concerned with consumerism and less with community, which isolates people from one another in their materialistic quests.