logo

100 pages 3 hours read

Hannah Webster Foster

The Coquette

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1797

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Letters 23-27Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Letter 23 Summary: “To the Rev. J. Boyer”

Mr. Selby responds to Boyer after having delivered his friend’s message to Eliza. Though he deems Eliza worthy of Boyer’s favor and affection, he notes that her attitude “favors a little of coquetry” (43).  

While Eliza retires to another room to write a reply to Boyer (which Selby reads as a positive sign), Selby notes that Mr. Laurence, his wife, Nancy, and Major Sanford are present. He judges Sanford “a man of show and fashion” (43). Eliza asks Mr. Selby if he can deliver a correspondence to a friend in Hampshire, to which he assents. He notes that Major Sanford eavesdrops on this conversation, and that he appeared “really interested in her movements” (44). The group ends the evening engaged in a discussion of politics.

Letter 24 Summary: “To the Rev. J. Boyer”

Continuing where his last letter left off, Mr. Selby has posted his and Eliza’s letters to Mr. Boyer. Selby rides up to the Richman’s estate to dine with Mr. Richman. He overtakes Eliza and Major Sanford riding along in Sanford’s coach. The two act disconcerted to be seen together.

Back at the house, Eliza tells the Richmans that her meeting with Sanford was purely coincidental: she, Nancy Laurence, and a male relation of the Laurences were riding when they “accidentally” encountered Sanford, who asked to join. Miss Laurence and her cousin head home, and Eliza and Sanford are left alone. Once again, despite Mrs. Richman’s misgivings, Eliza writes off Sanford’s forward behavior and gives him the benefit of the doubt.

Letter 25 Summary: “To the Rev. J. Boyer”

Eliza encourages the idea of Boyer striking up an epistolary correspondence with her, but refuses to answer his loving sentiments, reserving that sensitive topic for verbal correspondence. She says that she does not wish to attain happiness by “circumscribing our wishes within the compass of our abilities” (47). She wishes for an easier and freer means of happiness

Letter 26 Summary: “To Miss Lucy Freeman”

This letter gives Eliza’s account of the events described in Mr. Selby’s preceding letters. Despite the tone of her last letter, Eliza tells Lucy that she was happy with the contents of Mr. Boyer’s message. In addition, she confesses herself uncomfortable with Major Sanford’s advances. She notes that he seemed particularly anxious when Mr. Boyer came up in conversation. This excited her curiosity and increased her inquisitiveness concerning the reverend in order to test Sanford’s reactions. When Mr. Selby leaves, Sanford tries to get Eliza alone, but she avoids him. 

Major Sanford overtakes Eliza, Miss Laurence, and Miss Laurence’s cousin while they are riding. Sanford’s attention to Eliza “rather nettle[s]” Miss Laurence, who leaves with her cousin (49). Sanford offers Eliza a ticket to an event that evening. Sanford uses the opportunity of having Eliza alone to express that he is jealous of Eliza and Mr. Boyer. He fears the “total loss” of Eliza’s “favor and society, as soon as time and circumstances would allow” (50). His conduct alarms Eliza. 

Eliza claims that she is “under no special obligation” to Mr. Boyer, to which Sanford objects. Sanford fears that Eliza will listen to her friends, rather than her heart, and choose to marry Boyer. Eliza contends that she does not wish to marry anyone, saying, “I have but lately entered society; and wish, for a while, to enjoy my freedom, in the participation of pleasures, suited to my age and sex” (50). Major Sanford warns that marrying Boyer will force her to relinquish these freedoms. 

Eliza warns him that his conduct has “deviated far from the character of a friend and a brother” (50). Sanford is unable to play such a role. He will pursue her affection until she outright banishes him. 

At this point, Mr. Selby arrives and Sanford leaves. 

After dinner, as Eliza gets ready for the evening’s promised entertainment, Mrs. Richman enters. When Eliza tells her she’s going with Major Sanford, Mrs. Richman is exasperated. She believes that Sanford delights in ruining women like Eliza. Eliza suggests that Sanford might be reformed. Mrs. Richman then asks her why she is still leading Mr. Boyer on, to which she replies that she does not know enough about either man to make a choice. Mrs. Richman cautions her to listen to reason if she wishes for a happy future. 

Major Sanford arrives to pick her up. At the event, she is surprised to find Mr. Selby, who joins their party and takes every opportunity to speak with her. On the way home, Sanford redoubles his inquisitiveness toward Eliza and Mr. Boyer’s relationship. She rebukes him.

Eliza continues to be inclined to give Major Sanford the benefit of the doubt. She wishes for the trappings of a fashionable life. She laments that the positive qualities of Boyer and Sanford were not combined in a man. 

She ends her letter asking for Lucy’s advice.

Letter 27 Summary: “To the Rev. Mr. Boyer”

Mr. Selby laments that he believes even the most virtuous women “seem naturally prone to gaiety, to pleasure, and, I had almost said, to dissipation” (53). Selby goes to the assembly in order to observe Eliza’s behavior. He notes that she and Major Sanford were the subject of general speculation. 

Selby is worried on behalf of Mr. Boyer: he believes that Eliza and Sanford are too intimate, given the encouragement she showed to Boyer. He is anxious that his friend may “be made the dupe of a coquette” (54). He is unable to understand Eliza’s behavior, and wants to warn Boyer out of concern.

Letter 28 Summary: “To Mr. Charles Deighton”

Despite Eliza’s objections to his behavior, Major Sanford writes “I go on finely with my amour” (55). Sanford delights in his past experience that women “anticipate the honor of reclaiming the libertine, and reclaiming the rake” (55). Eliza has become more irresistible than ever to him, and he laments that this is the first time he has ever failed in a seduction. 

Sanford believes Eliza favors Mr. Boyer over himself; he admits that he plays upon the differences between Eliza and the reverend in order to “separate them entirely” (56). He wishes revenge upon Eliza’s friends and wants to spoil their plans of seeing Eliza and Boyer united. 

He closes the letter confirming that he has indeed purchased Captain Pribble’s estate in Hartford, a mile from Eliza’s mother’s home.

Letters 23-28 Analysis

This section of the novel presents the ability of an epistolary novel to compound the reader’s understanding of its events and the limitations put upon Eliza by the social constraints of her time. Letter 23 introduces Mr. Boyer’s frequent correspondent, Mr. T. Selby, as an active character. Selby functions mostly as a witness to the action taking place in Boyer’s absence. Because he seems to harbor the same morals as Boyer (as evidenced by Boyer’s confidence in him), Selby’s reactions can be assumed to be close to Boyer’s, were he present. 

Selby’s perspective on the events is limited to what he sees and what he insinuates. Sanford actively pursues Eliza and makes it his goal to appear wherever she does. When she is out riding with her friends, Sanford takes the opportunity to get Eliza alone. When Selby arrives, he only sees the outcome of their meeting. He does not witness Eliza rebuffing Sanford for his forward behavior, nor does he realize that Eliza’s apparently positive reception of the major is largely due to social politesse. Rejecting Sanford outright would be too forward; Eliza would rather discourage his attention through subtle verbal and body language cues. Selby merely sees Eliza and Sanford together and views it as inappropriate. Though his assessment of Eliza is made in respect to his close friend, it is unfair to Eliza because he does not know the whole story. Social restriction prevents him from confronting Eliza about it, just as it prevents Eliza from explaining her side of the story. Such constraint will prove to be her undoing.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text