65 pages • 2 hours read
John McPheeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
John McPhee describes a navigation lock on the Mississippi River that permits ships to drop several feet and descend out of the river to destinations to the west or the south. He notes that the territory adjacent to the river is Acadia or “Cajun country,” which is a term that refers to the descendants of French-Canadians who settled in southern Louisiana. McPhee chats with a man, Rabalais, who oversees the navigation lock. When Rabalais was young, there was no navigation lock; instead, the water—along with boats—streamed into the Atchafalaya River. The Atchafalaya has siphoned off water from the Mississippi for decades, and it won’t be long before the Atchafalaya overtakes the Mississippi completely. McPhee states that most of Louisiana owes its existence to the naturally shifting trajectory of the Mississippi River.
Booming cities like Baton Rouge and New Orleans would be threatened if the Atchafalaya overtakes the Mississippi and shifts course because these cities’ industries and way of life are dependent on the current location of the river. McPhee writes, “Nature, in this place, had become an enemy of the state” (7). Therefore, the US Army Corps of Engineers took on the task to stop the mighty Atchafalaya, which is how Rabalais came to work on the navigation lock. The Army Corps focused on a section of the Mississippi through which water was escaping into the Atchafalaya. This section is known as the Old River; the Army named the plan to tame the river Old River Control. The army erected a massive dam that splits Old River into two parts—the Mississippi side and the Atchafalaya side. McPhee takes a drive with Rabalais over the dam. McPhee wonders why the Mississippi has not jumped over the jam to join the Atchafalaya; Rabalais tells him that the Army has been closely monitoring the situation.
The Atchafalaya remained a major player even after the Army dammed up the Old River. Engineers could use the Atchafalaya like a safety valve to relieve pressure on the Mississippi. The Atchafalaya also acted as a water source for the Cajun community. Therefore, the Army did not want to dam the Atchafalaya; it must instead supply it with water from the Mississippi, but it must give this water to the Atchafalaya in such a way that it did not completely overwhelm the Mississippi with its might.
Not far from the navigation lock, the Army Corps dug a bridge-like channel with gates that engineers could raise or shut, akin to windows. This canal drew in water from the Mississippi and flowed out to the Red-Atchafalaya. In 1950, the Atchafalaya took approximately 30% of the water that flowed into the Old River; the Army Corps called this 30% the “latitude flow.” The US Congress deemed 30% to be the ideal flow, and so it mandated the Army Corps to maintain this exact rate for years to come, which necessitated the construction of the canal with the gates—a weir. This weir effectively created a “new” Old River starting in 1963, which is when the water officially started to flow.
Some people applauded the construction of these various devices as the pinnacle of civil engineering. Others, like Oliver Houck, a professor at Tulane University, considered such unnatural inventions to be the result of human arrogance in trying to tame a force like the Mississippi. Others said that the Old River structure was bound to fail, but the Corps was determined to succeed. Similar to Rabalais’s management of the navigation lock, LeRoy Dugas—nickname Dugie—manages the device that controls the flow of the Old River. Dugie is also Cajun. When he first took on the job, he thought the Army Corps was crazy for trying to control the flow. McPhee describes the man-made structure at the Old River in greater detail and how strange it is to see the Mississippi being diverted through the structure.
McPhee describes a long, luxurious towboat known as the Mississippi that inspects the navigation lock and hears complaints at other points along the river, along with picking up passengers. Major General Thomas Sands commandeers the vessel. The vessel’s boat captains or river pilots gather in the pilothouse of the ship. Jorge Cano is a local pilot temporarily helping the regular pilots navigate the Atchafalaya, as the Atchafalaya’s water levels can be as much as 20 feet lower than the Mississippi River’s.
McPhee discusses the Mississippi River Commission and its president, General Sands; the Commission is legally obligated to conduct these inspection trips. Most of the Commission consists of non-military civilian personnel, though there are a few military officers like Sands. It’s unclear to McPhee—and the people he interviews—why the Army is still involved in the Mississippi River’s navigation lock system. The Army originally became involved in the river system in order to prevent another instance like the War of 1812, during which the British Army attacked New Orleans through the Gulf Coast. To fortify US defenses against a naval invasion, Congress requested that the Army monitor the Mississippi River to improve navigation on the river.
The author notes Sands’s physical prowess, militaristic outlook, educational background, and work history in the Army. Sands now oversees the division of the Army Corps that spans from Missouri to the Gulf Coast.
Millions of people depend on the Old River, and the Army Corps must balance the competing interests of farmers, fishermen, and others who want the Corps to manipulate the water in different ways according to the water level and the saltwater-to-freshwater ratio. Although people consider the Atchafalaya to be quite dangerous, McPhee compares the river to a “big alligator in a low slough, with time on its side, waiting—waiting to outwait the Corps of Engineers” (24). Humans, however, don’t have the luxury of time on their side.
McPhee speaks to a few engineers on the towboat, who state that the Red River used to flow in both directions—including into the Mississippi—but then began to flow into the increasingly powerful Atchafalaya. The Army’s intervention—through the man-made structures on the Old River—is the only mechanism preventing the dominant Atchafalaya from decimating the Old River. One of the engineers concedes that the structures are not foolproof—they can fail, almost certainly dooming the Mississippi River to Atchafalaya’s capture.
By 1963—a decade after the control structures on the Old River were implemented—the Corps had effectively declared victory in its management of the Mississippi River and its tributaries. In the winter of 1973, river levels rose to higher-than-normal levels. The levees on the river were unable to contain the water, so the Army added sandbags and other makeshift barriers to the levees. A professor of civil engineering, Raphael G. Kazmann, walked on the man-made control structure on the Old River and found it dangerously unstable.
A hole—hidden underneath the water—developed on the side of the control structure. LeRoy Dugas or “Dugie” recounts his memories of the 1973 flood. In order to preserve the control structure, he and his coworkers were unable to close any of the gates to minimize the floodwaters. Dugie discovered that the foundations of the guide wall—part of the control structure—had totally eroded. The Army Corps began to see the limits of its control.
McPhee dives into the history of the water in the Mississippi River Valley. Indigenous people understood the turbulent nature of the waters, which flooded the land. As French colonizers conquered the area and wished to establish permanent farming settlements, however, they realized they must reign in the power of the Mississippi River. The first houses in New Orleans were built on levees, which the residents were supposed to raise; this method of mandating residents to raise their own levees proves to be ineffective. Entrepreneur Henry Shreve, best known for inventing the Mississippi steamboat, appeared on the scene in the 1800s. He observed that trees in the river obstructed navigation, and so he uprooted the trees with the permission of Army engineers. There was a loop on the river that steamboats had trouble navigating, so he cut off the loop, thus speeding up the Mississippi and increasing water flow into the Atchafalaya. The water departing from the Mississippi began to flow through a new section that became the Old River.
The more the levees constrain the river’s movement, the more damage the river does when water tears through a break in the levees—known as a crevasse. In 1850, Congress passed the Swamp and Overflow Land Act, which sold swampland in Louisiana and elsewhere to pay for the levees. As the levees restricted the river’s outlets and the water rose ever higher, people wondered if even the levees could hold back the mighty waters. Engineers began to debate the merits of creating a network of reservoirs, floodways, and dams that could contain and distribute the water during floods. At this time, the Army Corps had no control over the levee system, which states and districts managed on a patchwork basis. Numerous floods occurred, and the levees failed multiple during the 1860s. In 1879 Congress established the Mississippi River Commission, which granted control over the river system to the Corps and left it up to the Corps to determine how best to prevent floods. The Corps was not in favor of creating dams and spillways, maintaining that levees were the best option.
James B. Eads, whom McPhee calls “probably the most brilliant engineer who has ever addressed his attention to the Mississippi River” (38), built jetties at the mouth of the Mississippi River, which led to a narrowing of the river’s currents and deepened the channel so that ships could pass through it. Eads’s work buoyed the Corps’ belief that the levees alone could maintain the river levels. Mark Twain—the famous author, who was a boatman at the time—criticized the notion that man could tame the Mississippi River. At first, slaves worked on the levees; after the end of slavery, immigrants carried on the work. In 1927, a flood—brought about by the confining power of the levees—destroyed bridges and killed hundreds of people, though New Orleans was spared.
By 1927, the Corps realized that the levees exacerbated the problem of flooding. Congress doled out $300 million in the Flood Control Act of 1928. This money set up the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project, which built additional levees, raised the existing ones, and used dams to contain the river. The project also acknowledged the river’s strength by building gates in levees—spillways or floodways—that could open during flood season and guide the water down the river to the Gulf Coast. The first such spillway, constructed in 1931, was Bonnet Carre north of New Orleans. Water diverted from Bonnet Carre into a lake—thus bypassing the city of New Orleans and protecting it from flooding—on the way to the Gulf.
However, the main floodway for the Mississippi was the Atchafalaya. Atchafalaya’s southern section contained the largest river swamp in North America, so it could store ample amounts of water. Therefore, the Corps built structures to direct water toward Atchafalaya Bay, including a three-tiered floodway system near Old River in the northern section of Atchafalaya. This floodway became known as the West Atchafalaya Floodway. The Corps also constructed the Morganza Floodway.
The Corps’s designs kept Old River—the only tributary of the Mississippi to remain untouched and natural—open. The Corps was aware of the threat that the Atchafalaya posed to the Mississippi, so it set up the Old River Control system in 1954 and raised the levees. However, the levees of the 1950s were unsuitable by the 1970s, as new construction developments all over the country unintentionally led to increased drain-off and excess water heading toward Louisiana, producing the great flood of 1973. A third of the Mississippi flowed into the Atchafalaya at this time, but if it weren’t for the Old River Control, that number would be closer to 70%. The Corps’s division commander, Major General Charles Noble, worried about the stability of the Old River Control during these violent floods. The soybean farmers near the Morganza Floodway worried about their crops being flooded, and so they asked the Corps not to open the Floodway. The Corps, however, decided to open the Floodway gates to relieve some of the pressure on the Old River Control, a plan that became a high-priority project for the Corps.
The Corps worked to retain control, even though leaving the gates open took away its control over the river. Men in boats began to drop heavy balls in the river to detect holes in Old River Control. On the whole, however, the Corps remained confident. McPhee quotes a Corps general who said at the time, “The Corps of Engineers can make the Mississippi River go anywhere the Corps directs it to go” (50). The Corps built a replica model of the Old River to better predict flood rates and project repairs needed. Reinforcements to the Old River Control—to the tune of $500 million—led to the reinforced, more developed Old River Control Auxiliary Structure. While the Corps remains confident in its ability to contain the Mississippi River through the Old River Control, geologists point out that the Atchafalaya’s capture of the Mississippi is almost certain to occur as the Mississippi naturally turns toward the west and as floods grow stronger.
McPhee returns to the towboat (also named Mississippi), which has run aground on a sandbar in the river. He re-introduces General Sands, the Corps’ division commander; John Dugger, the boat’s pilot; and Jorge Cano, the local contact pilot. Dugger responds to the sandbar by cutting the boat’s engines, allowing the river’s currents to naturally move the boat around the sandbar. McPhee asks Sands and others about the possibility of the Atchafalaya overtaking the Mississippi River outside of the Old River Control. The men are uncertain, and they express even less faith in the ability of the newly constructed auxiliary control structure to withstand the Atchafalaya.
Sands wonders what southern Louisiana would be like had humans not settled there. He answers his own question by stating that nature and men cannot coexist together in this space. In that scenario, McPhee imagines that the entire area would be covered in sediment and water due to flooding. Until the 1900s, the sediment deposits created a land-building process that outweighed the floodwaters, but now, the land gains have been negative for nearly a century. Rising water between the levees leads to a loss of land behind the levees, and the Mississippi delta plain becomes isolated from its surroundings by the levees. Half of New Orleans now rests beneath the sea level by as much as 15 feet. The city’s wealthier residents live on the higher ground, and the poorer residents live in the lower-elevation areas, which are more prone to flooding.
So much rain falls on New Orleans that it could form a lake, but the city pumps out the water, depleting the city’s water table. When the city drains marshland for development, the ground shrinks as well in a process known as subsidence. Subsidence makes the ground underneath homes unstable, leading the property to sink several feet, even as the house—propped up on slabs—remains in the same place.
McPhee writes that the “river goes through New Orleans like an elevated highway” (61). There are serious inadequacies in the levees in New Orleans. Water levels are higher in New Orleans, and the levees tend to sink as well. Due to the Corps’s intervention, erosion reduces the size of the coastal marshes, and large swathes of Louisiana disappear each year. Creating canals to oil and gas sites also increases the loss of land. This loss of land exacerbates storm surges around New Orleans, so the Corps must build levees all around New Orleans. The author speaks with a geologist, Sherwood Gagliano, who tells McPhee that we cannot restore nature to its former state. Gagliano urges the Corps to divert water to offset the loss of nutrients and sediments due to the levees. Professor Kazmann is less optimistic about the possibility of saving the Louisiana coast. Either way, the Corps is unwilling to give up, and it adjusts its strategy in response to nature’s changes.
The author turns once more to the towboat known as the Mississippi and notes that it has made it halfway down the river. It is humid outside, so most people onboard remain indoors. Wealthy civilians on the ship play a game of cards. One of these civilians is Oliver Houck, the former general counsel of the National Wildlife Federation. Houck discusses his concerns with General Sands—particularly his concern that the military, through the Corps, is taking on an unusually political role in the region. Sands, in defense, states that Houck’s neighborhood would be flooded were it not for the Corps.
McPhee recalls traveling into the Atchafalaya swamp for the first time in 1980 with Charles Frying, a professor of landscape architecture at Louisiana State University. McPhee describes how silt is overflowing into the Atchafalaya swamp, creating new land. This creates a question of ownership of the new land, as three-quarters of the Atchafalaya falls under private ownership. These private owners want access to the resources underneath the bayou, such as oil. The various parties—such as the Corps and fishermen—have devised a compromise to suit all their interests when it concerns the biggest river swamp in North America.
McPhee discusses the traditional Cajun way of life in the swamp, which persists in the modern era in the form of a multi-million-dollar fishing and crawfish industry. He meets a Cajun crawfisherman named Mike Bourque. Through his travels with Bourque and Dave Soileau—Bourque’s brother-in-law—McPhee details the process of catching crawfish. Oil companies own parts of the swamp, and fishermen have been arrested for trespassing on their property. Bourque complains that the water is not muddy enough for catching crawfish, who get hungry when the water is muddier, and blames the Corps for not distributing more water in the Mississippi. Bourque says that he has never heard of the towboat Mississippi, which allows civilians to come onboard and air their grievances with the Corps, but he maintains that the Corps knows about the crawfishermen’s grievances. He believes the Corps sides with fishermen raising crawfish in artificial ponds, who want lower water levels. Bourque surprises McPhee when he states that he approves of the levees, because they confine crawfish to certain areas and make them easier to fish.
The men onboard the towboat debate what will occur should the Atchafalaya capture the Mississippi. Oliver Houck tells others onboard, “When nature shifts, man shifts” (78), noting that the oil and gas industries will likely move to the basin. They call Morgan City near the Atchafalaya the “new New Orleans” (78). Morgan is a small town behind a 22-foot-high wall designed to prevent flooding, as water surrounds the town on all sides. General Sands receives frequent complaints from residents—such as Doc Brownell—that the Corps ought to do more to protect Morgan City, including creating an extension of the levee. Brownell speaks firmly of his community’s right to exist in the middle of a floodplain. The artificial designs of humans blend in with the natural behavior of the environment in the floodplains surrounding Morgan City. McPhee describes stuffed alligators in Brownell’s home. He details the history of industry in Morgan City, including the oyster and shrimp businesses and cypress tree sawmills.
McPhee introduces a Corps picket boat captain named Kent. Kent defends Old River Control by diverting barges that have broken loose, which damage the Control if they’re taken in by the powerful currents of the Atchafalaya and crash into the Control’s gates. After reflecting on the number of barges that crash into the Control Structure, General Sands concludes that the structure is ill-suited to its location. Drift—or big logs—also crash into the structure’s anchoring cables. However, a geologist, Fred Smith, says that the Corps will maintain the Control Structure in its present location for economic reasons.
In the first section of “Atchafalaya,” the lockmaster, Rabalais, utters these words to the author as he removes a red bandana: “You are a coonass with that red handkerchief” (4). McPhee takes the statement in stride. “Coonass” is local slang for “Cajun”; Rabalais essentially refers to McPhee as an honorary Cajun, even though McPhee is not from the area. This passage shows how the author forms bonds with the locals that he interviews—almost by accident. This trust between McPhee and his sources helps McPhee obtain the information he needs to write his book.
Rabalais’s statement also underscores the locals’ way of speaking in Acadia through particular slang. The previous passage shows how McPhee establishes characters in a smart and succinct manner. For example, McPhee offers a description of the environment as a way to describe its characters. One example is the informal, home-like feel of the lockmaster’s office, where Rabalais offers McPhee a plate of chicken gravy. This anecdote reveals the simple hospitality of the people who reside in southern Louisiana and their generosity even towards an outsider. McPhee also provides context and background on his subjects to set up their expertise and help the reader relate to them. Specifically, we meet Dugie, who shows McPhee his connection to water from childhood. Since Dugie grew up near the Mississippi and later worked as a naval gunner during World War II, he understands the flow of water and is well-suited to make taming the Atchafalaya his career.
McPhee also highlights the unique local traditions and culture of Cajun country. He includes colloquialisms or sayings used by locals, such as this line: “There’s nothing prettier than a willow branch eaten by a beaver” (76). Moreover, McPhee interviews sources not just about the river, but also about their language and culture, as seen in this statement from a Cajun man: “French and English—we mix it up […] When I talk to myself, I talk in French. When I meet other fishermen, ninety per cent of the time we speak French” (71). McPhee also underscores the local dialect, which involves pronunciation specific to Cajuns in southern Louisiana. For example, Bayou Eugene is pronounced as “by yooz yen” (75). “Bonnet Carre” becomes “Bonny Carey’ (44). Perhaps most importantly, McPhee discusses the linguistics surrounding “Atchafalaya.’ The “a”s are broad, the word rhymes with “jambalaya,” and the accents are on the second and fourth syllables” (23). By detailing the proper pronunciation of the regional vocabulary, McPhee allows the readers to imagine that they are speaking to the interviewees themselves and allows them to understand the Atchafalaya river basin more accurately.
McPhee also enlivens his book with colorful characters, such as Doc Brownell, who owned a pet alligator named Old Bull for 35 years. He often provides extensive character descriptions upon introduction that allow the reader to better visualize and empathize with the person. A good example is the character introduction of Charles Fryling, which includes details about his physical features and country drawl.
For McPhee, details and statistics add specificity to a place. These details not only help emphasize big-picture concepts, but also show the high caliber of his research into the topic. For example, McPhee notes that the size of Louisiana has dropped by a million acres over a hundred years. This detail helps the reader understand what the loss of habitation means for humans in the area—flooding: “Where fifty miles of marsh are gone, fifty inches of additional water will inevitably surge” (63). In another important detail, McPhee includes a reference to the native people of the area to show that there was—and still is—an indigenous community with deep knowledge of the river: “In the language of the Longtown Choctaw, ‘Hacha Falaia’ meant ‘Long River” (68-69). He implies that the subsequent European colonizers disregarded the wisdom of the indigenous people who previously lived in accordance with nature.
McPhee also employs simile and metaphors to compare big concepts to more easily understood ideas, such as in this passage about southern Louisiana, which utilizes simile to compare the winding arc of the Mississippi River to that of a pianist’s erratic playing: “Southern Louisiana exists in its present form because the Mississippi River has jumped here and there within an arc about two hundred miles wide, like a pianist playing with one hand” (5). In another passage, McPhee uses simile to showcase the high stakes of the Army Corps’s mission: “After the Corps damned Old River, in 1963, the engineers could not just walk away, like roofers who had fixed a leak” (9).
Simile and metaphor also come into play with scene-setting, which is a technique for establishing the environment in which the book takes place. In one example of scene-setting, McPhee shows how unusual it is to see the Mississippi spilling sideways through a man-made device “like cornmeal pouring from a hole in a burlap bag” (15). Other forms of scene-setting include extensive description, such as when McPhee sets up this picturesque image of the landscape surrounding the levees:
Cattle were grazing on the slopes of the levees, and white horses with white colts, in deep-green grass. Behind the levees, the fields were flat and reached to rows of distant trees. Very early in the morning, a low fog had covered the fields (8).
Creating significant imagery does not always require lengthy prose. McPhee paints a picture of New Orleans—barricaded by levees—by calling it a “walled medieval city” (63).
Another technique that McPhee utilizes is the creation of lists to convey description in a succinct manner. McPhee describes the General Sands using a list of his defining characteristics: “his two stars, his warm smile, his intuitive sense of people, and his knowledge of hydrology” (20). From this list, we know everything we need to know about General Sands’s commanding and congenial presence. McPhee describes Sands’s appearance to show that he is not your typical general—and perhaps that he may be suited to this odd political title: “The water czar, I feel a duty to insert, is not the very model of a major general. If he were to chew nails, he would break his teeth” (66). McPhee also deploys lists to help with scene-setting, such as when he describes the countryside around Old River: “this was a countryside of corn and soybeans, of grain-fed catfish ponds, of feed stores and Kingdom Halls in crossroad towns” (8)
Lastly, McPhee makes occasional use of aphorisms, or pithy statements that generalize to make a larger point. In one such aphorism, he talks about the metaphorical battlefield between the Atchafalaya and the Mississippi. He emphasizes how this conflict will never end due to the natural flooding in the area and the Corps’s will to fight: “Most battlefields, though, are places where something happened once. Here it would happen indefinitely” (9).
Literary nonfiction is a type of nonfiction that uses devices—like simile, metaphor and elegant prose—traditionally found in fiction to make a work more engaging and easily understood to a wider audience. This type of nonfiction can also be referred to as literary reportage if the work in question contains some journalistic undertakings, as McPhee does in The Control of Nature. Some other techniques commonly found in literary reportage include section breaks or extra spacing used to naturally break up different sections of a chapter. Section breaks in this book allow the reader to move back and forth in time, across places, and among different characters. Moreover, McPhee interweaves the history of the Atchafalaya—and the Corps—with the progression of the Mississippi towboat down the river, using section breaks to accomplish this back-and-forth narrative. On page 64, for example, McPhee switches from discussions with the Corps about its tactics prior to the section break to the towboat’s current location after the section break.
Another technique common to both literary nonfiction and fiction is irony. As many of the Corps’s actions backfire and cause more problems, McPhee drops some dramatic irony to underscore the absurdity of the situation and the foolishness of the Corps’s actions: “The levees were helping to aggravate the problem they were meant to solve” (43) Finally, literary nonfiction includes references to historical figures or facts to make a point about the present, such as when McPhee references Fort Laramie—a military post in Wyoming during the 1800s—to emphasize what the Corps must create through its levees and man-made devices in order to protect southern Louisiana residents: “In effect, the Corps would have to build a Fort Laramie: a place where the natives could buy flour and firearms but where the gates could be closed if they attacked” (10). McPhee’s highbrow references to literature, history and culture reveal that not only is he well-read, but he anticipates that his audience will be, too. We see this in McPhee’s description of Charles Fryling, whom he describes as the “Romulus to Oliver Houck’s Remus” (67).
A key theme that this essay brings up is how the Corps views the efforts to control nature in militaristic terms. A chalk slate in Sands’s office reads: “DO WHAT’S RIGHT, AND BE PREPARED TO FIGHT AS INFANTRY WHEN REQUIRED!!!” (21). The Corps uses language of battles and sports matches to show how it must conquer or win against its existential enemy: nature. McPhee writes that “General Sands […] has a look on his face which suggests that Hopkins has scored on Army but Army will win the game” (55). The Army stakes out metaphorical and literal battle lines against the river. The essay references both the Maginot Line from World War II and the Great Wall of China as comparisons to the Corps’s fight against the river. To be fair, there is a lot at stake. The Mississippi River Commission does work that protects millions of people: “These […] are four among two million nine hundred thousand people whose livelihoods, safety, health and quality of life are directly influenced by the Corps’ controls at Old River” (22).
Nonetheless, the Corps also displayed a startling level of overconfidence in its ability to tame the river: “We harnessed it, straightened it, regularized it, shackled it” (26). Or, “As Fred Chatry once said, ‘The Corps of Engineers is convinced that the Mississippi River can be convinced to remain where it is” (54). This confidence gives way to arrogance as well as a stunning lack of foresight about how the Corps’s actions might cause further damage, leading to a self-perpetuating cycle. The more interventions the Corps installs, the more problems it inadvertently creates. Fixing those problems creates more problems, and so on.
McPhee interviews sources who tell him that the Corps’s overbearing need for control stems from a fear about what may happen—including the human devastation and loss of industry—should it fail to reign in the Atchafalaya: “The Corps of Engineers—they’re scared as hell. They don’t know what’s going to happened. This is planned chaos. The more planning they do, the more chaotic it is. Nobody knows exactly where it’s going to end” (55). Metaphorical battle lines also foment between the Army Corps and civilians as they clash over what should be done about the river. McPhee cites this quote about General Sands to emphasize the divides between the two groups: “‘You are Army—an untypical American entity to be performing a political role like this’ […] He calls him ‘a political water czar’” (66).
This book was published decades ago—long before Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005 and devastated communities throughout southern Louisiana. Crucially, it was the failure of the levees—whose instability McPhee discusses at length in this essay—that caused some of the hardest-hitting damage to New Orleans during Katrina. As McPhee indicated at the time of writing, the poorest—and predominantly African American—individuals who lived in the lowest-lying areas of the city were affected the most by the flooding that the hurricane brought. Income inequality ties into geography in this essay: “In New Orleans, income and elevation can be correlated on a literally sliding scale: the Garden District on the highest level, Stanley Kowalski in the swamp” (59). Without knowing it, McPhee foreshadows what will happen to New Orleans when he highlights the Corps’s battle to control the Mississippi River. The Corps fought hard to fight against time, but eventually—inevitably—it lost.
Despite McPhee’s ability to relate to his subjects, there remains a fundamental difference in perspective between the outsider McPhee and the local residents he interviews. McPhee serves in as a stand-in for the reader, and he exploits that difference to show the author’s point-of-view versus the locals’:
What struck me most of all as he talked was his evident and inherent conviction that a community can have a right to exist—to rise, expand, and prosper—in the middle of one of the most theatrically inundated floodplains in the world (83).
Here, McPhee uses his somewhat detached perspective as an outsider to demonstrate the irrational behavior of local residents and engineers, who continue to believe that they can live undisturbed in an area with incessant flooding.
By John McPhee