54 pages • 1 hour read
John GrishamA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the novel features scenes of torture and interrogation of a child.
Reverend Schroeder finds a website run by Flak that provides the story of Donté, including an account of the interrogation session that led to Donté’s confession.
Downplaying the importance of Donté’s Miranda rights, a detective convinced Donté to sign away his right to an attorney. Over the next 15 hours, lead Detective Kerber lied to Donté about eyewitnesses who identified him as the killer, because “[p]olice are permitted to lie at will during an interrogation” (88). A distraught Donté agreed to a polygraph test, which he passed—he was at home the night of the abduction, babysitting. However, Kerber told him the polygraph said he was lying and warned that a jury would see those results—another lie. Violating the law, Kerber negotiated Donté’s confession, promising the teen that if he admitted to killing Nicole, the death penalty would be taken off the table. Kerber ramped up the pressure, by lying that a friend would testify about Donté’s stormy relationship with Nicole. Donté, in tears, took another lie detector test and passed again. To Kerber, however, “the truth was not important” (96). 15 hours into his interrogation, Donté figured the only way to get out of the police station was to give Kerber what he wanted, a confession. Donté was certain that Nicole would turn up any day and the whole mess would blow over. On video, he confessed to the crime (with prodding from Kerber) and was then charged with abduction, aggravated rape, and capital murder.
Despite the polygraph evidence, despite the lies the police told, and their brutal interrogation tactics (Donté was not allowed to sleep, see his parents, or eat—all feature of torture), Donté’s conviction and sentence were upheld by multiple appeals courts.
It is Tuesday morning. Donté is scheduled to die Thursday evening at 6pm. The private investigator tells Flak that Joey Gamble might recant. Joey’s worries about a perjury charge are moot—the statute of limitations has long run out. Flak also gets a phone call from “some minister” (103) in Topeka who claims to have information about Nicole’s killing. Flak dismisses the call as “another nut” (103).
When the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denies Flak’s motion for clemency, Flak decides to visit Donté in prison. He brings along a noted clinical psychiatrist to evaluate Donté. Texas has outlawed executing people with mental illness but proving that imprisonment has led to mental illness is at best a long shot.
Meanwhile, Nicole’s family prepares a massive extended family dinner. The big shot national crime reporter interviews Reeva, who tears up on cue: “She had cried in public for so long that she could now chatter away while the tears flowed” (113). Once again using racist dog-whistle terminology, she says that the “animal” who killed her daughter “deserved to die” (114). The TV crew packs up and heads to the airport—they are covering another execution, this one in Florida.
After getting the brush-off from the Flak Law Offices receptionist, Reverend Schroeder calls his friend Matthew Burns, who works in Topeka’s prosecutor’s office, for advice. Burns stresses that to prove that Boyette is telling the truth, the defense team is going to want him to lead them to Nicole’s body. The problem is that Boyette is on parole and by law cannot leave Kansas—but Boyette claims only he can find where the body is in Missouri.
Schroeder proposes that Boyette make a video confession in which he reveals where Nicole is buried. Boyette, groggy from medication, his head throbbing, refuses to make the video. Schroeder fears the tumor is killing Boyette’s “desire to help the cause” (124). Burns advises Schroeder to let the matter go, now claiming that he is just a lying sociopath seeking attention and messing with the pastor: “The odds are heavy,” he says, “[Texas] got the right guy” (127).
When the innocent Donté arrived on death row in October 1999, it was a nightmare. The windowless cell was narrow, the racket of inmates screaming and praying never stopped, food (or what passes for food) slid in through a slot, his family was not allowed to visit, and he was allowed out of his cell for only one hour a day. What most terrified Donté, however, was the steady rate of executions—seven in his first month alone.
In isolation, Donté grew depressed. He tried to keep himself busy by replaying his old football games. But after a year, he grew despondent, sleeping most of the day. When the appeals courts upheld his conviction, Donté tried to summon up the energy to read, exercise, meditate, and write letters: “He would find the will to stop his slide into insanity” (134). But this brief period of activity did not last.
As his execution draws near, the 27-year-old Donté, now haggard and skinny, has lost hope. Flak arrives and the two talk through the phones in the visitors’ room. After the psychiatrist observes Donté, she agrees to sign off on Donté’s mental decline, certifying that “confinement had driven him insane” (137). The only time Donté shows any emotion is when he begs Flak not to let his mother witness the execution.
Leaving the prison, Flak gets a call from the private investigator. Joey Gamble wants to talk.
On Flak’s website, Schroeder reads an extensive account of the trial, which featured questionable testimony from a so-called jailhouse snitch who, in return for a sentence reduction, told the jury that Donté had bragged about the crime. Despite clear problems with this evidence, trial judge Vivian Grale refused Flak’s motion to have the snitch’s testimony and Donté’s coerced confession tossed.
Six years after the trial, Slone was rocked by the revelation that while the trial was going, prosecuting DA Paul Koffee and Judge Grale, both married with families, were having an affair. Although Grale resigned in disgrace, Koffee was reelected. Most shockingly, an appeal court found insufficient evidence that the affair had impacted the verdict.
That night Boyette calls Schroeder. He does not want “that boy” to die (146) and wants to visit “my little Nikki” one last time (145). Boyette agrees to make the taped confession but demands to be taken to Joplin to locate Nicole’s body: “I have to be there for that” (147). Schroeder is conflicted: He has no reason to believe Boyette is telling the truth and aiding a violent criminal on parole to leave the state would put Schroeder in legal jeopardy. But he still hopes to stop an innocent man from being killed.
On Wednesday morning, Flak files an appeal based on the psychiatrist’s findings. He doubts the appeal will work.
He then visits an old family friend, a retired judge who commiserates about the injustice of what happened to Donté. Without a body, witnesses, and evidence, Koffee simply strung together a convincing story that played on the all-white jury’s bigotry to secure the conviction. The judge, regretting not acting earlier, agrees to call the governor, but offers little hope for any delay.
As Schroeder begins to connect the abstract ideal of Christian forgiveness that he preaches in his sermons with the reality of what is happening to Donté in Texas, he emerges as an advocate for social justice. In the character of the pastor, the novel argues for The Need For Activism. Schroeder realizes that outrage, prayer, and anger are not enough. Schroeder at first hesitates to commit to a cause that could lead to serious consequences for himself: Getting involved with Boyette is personally dangerous, as the man is a sociopathic monster, poses a threat to Schroeder’s reputation (if Boyette happens to be lying), and puts Schroeder at legal risk (if he agrees to transport Boyette across state lines). Nevertheless, Schroeder—and readers—must weigh against all of that the execution of an innocent man. The moral thing to do is clear, so Schroeder decides to act.
To bring readers along on the same emotional journey that Schroeder goes through, Grisham focuses on educating readers about the reality of death penalty trials. These chapters devote a lot of space to Flak’s website about Donté’s interrogation, arrest, and conviction, all of which testify to The Fallibility of Capital Punishment. Detective Kerber begins Donté’s interrogation already convinced that he Nicole’s killer; rather than doing police work and trying to solve her disappearance after learning that Donté has a solid alibi, he uses his position of authority and his power to manipulate a vulnerable child into confessing to a crime he didn’t commit. Donté’s interrogation is basically torture: The boy is bullied into declining legal counsel, deprived of sleep and food for 15 hours, and not allowed to see his father. Kerber’s may lies, including telling Donté he failed two lie detector tests and that witnesses can connect him to Nicole’s disappearance shows Schroeder (and readers) the ease with which determined police officers can circumvent the intentions of the legal system, while technically staying within the law.
Grisham is at pains to limit any nuance in his portrayal of the novel’s antagonists. Most are deeply flawed individuals whose complete lack of morality affects their professional life. Kerber is a racist bigot and bully; DA Koffee and trial judge Grale are equally morally suspect. While the case is happening, the prosecutor and judge are having an affair—a clandestine relationship that explains why the judge rejected Flak’s motion to suppress the confession, given the coercive nature of the interrogation process. Grisham then asks readers to imagine a whole system of people like these three peopling the courts that deny Donté appeals: Despite being ostensibly created to determine the facts about guilt and innocence, the legal system turns on the dictum that “[t]ruth was not important” (96).
To complete the education of readers, Grisham depicts what life on death row is like. After nine years of being left isolated for 23 hours a day in a closet-sized windowless room, Donté feels “his brain failing him” (134)—the psychiatrist Flak hires confirms signs of mental illness. The psychiatrist’s report shows the vicious Catch-22 of capital punishment: Condemning people to death row ensures their mental decline—thus creating prisoners who are not fit to be executed. However, arguments about prisoners’ mental health status are unlikely to succeed. Although Texas is one of a few US states that prohibit the execution of the mentally ill, it is still up to the courts to accept appeals based on mental health—courts that Grisham presents as staffed by deeply morally and ethically compromised judges.
By John Grisham
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Horror, Thrillers, & Suspense
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Mothers
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
True Crime & Legal
View Collection