49 pages • 1 hour read
Matthew Dixon, Brent AdamsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Dixon and Adamson discuss the frontline sales manager’s role in affecting change at an organizational scale. One of the major hurdles companies face is that many managers lack the skills required to manage business transformations, much less succeed in their position.
The authors turn to the Sales Leadership Diagnostic, a behavioral survey the SEC conducted that determined the world-class manager profile based on key attributes. The SEC found that high-performing managers required fundamental skills such as reliability and integrity, that high-performing representatives were not necessarily high-performing managers, and that knowledge of a star manager profile could enable companies to execute the candidate selection process more effectively.
Star manager attributes fall under three umbrellas:
Digging deeper into the subcategories under owning, Dixon and Adamson clarify that innovation is less about increasing business value with new capabilities than it is about critically drawing connections between the company’s existing value and the customer’s business environment. Innovative sales managers discover creative ways to overcome unanticipated obstacles in the sales process, working closely with representatives to execute dynamic plans. Hence, this attribute is the most significant aspect of the star manager profile, and the authors stress its role in actualizing the Challenger Selling Model.
Nevertheless, the other categories—in particular, coaching—also require greater understanding and management than is currently the norm to boost sales performance across the organization. Unlike training, which merely shares knowledge with individuals in a contained event, coaching requires ongoing, customized, and behavioral engagement. Effective coaching has little impact on weak and strong performers but significantly improves the performance of core representatives, which boosts employee retention and morale.
Dixon and Adamson advise managers to clearly know the performance standards the organization seeks from sales. To provide a model for coaching managers to follow, they examine a coaching template that outlines behavioral objectives for each stage of the sales process. They also note that while most managers do “spreadsheet coaching”—spotlighting outcomes like conversion rate (the number of leads that turn into customers)—they should instead focus on correcting and reinforcing behaviors.
The authors advise assuming that the present coaching results are less than desirable, making it necessary to seek and implement new solutions. They suggest using “Hypothesis-Based Coaching,” which undercuts several coaching issues by having a clear theory of how the representative can adopt helpful behaviors. The authors break down this approach through the “PAUSE framework,” a step-by-step coaching conversation that centers clarity, intentionality, and continuity as the drivers of behavioral change.
The text returns to the discussion of sales innovation, further breaking it down into three key activities:
The authors recall that among the key attributes affecting manager excellence, resource allocation has a weaker impact than selling, coaching, and sales innovation. While resource allocation prioritizes efficiency, the authors suggest that using innovation to become more effective has nearly two times as much impact on the organization. Efficiency centers the organization’s existing competencies and improves their capability to perform them; however, to drive improved results, sales teams should also engage with competency gaps.
The text acknowledges that managers may be naturally prejudiced against complex problems, leading to a mindset the authors call “narrowing thinking.” Prioritizing efficiency, managers try to come up with the best solution in the moment rather than seek alternatives that could create several solutions. Innovative managers exhibit the opposite mindset—“opening thinking”—which begins by raising awareness about the biases that prevent this kind of thinking.
The authors suggest several ways to shift from a narrow to an opening thinking mindset, from directly informing managers of these biases to asking reflective questions. The latter method encourages managers to set aside practicality and consider alternative perspectives, such as those of the stakeholders associated with the customer, by asking prompting questions. They introduce the SCAMMPERR Framework, an SEC tool that uses prompting questions to invigorate brainstorming and innovative thinking.
Drawing from their experience since the initial 2009 study, Dixon and Adamson divide this chapter’s insights into three sections: lessons for sales leaders, lessons for marketing leaders, and lessons for all senior leaders.
In the first section, the authors remind managers to carefully distinguish Challenger behaviors from those of the other profiles so that they can effectively institutionalize the former. Similarly, they caution teams against adopting the Lone Wolf behavioral profile wholesale, in spite of those representatives’ statistical performance, since their behavior is counterproductive to selling complex solutions in a team-driven environment. Next, they urge sales leaders to modify their hiring process to seek out potential Challengers, expediting the adoption of the model. They also suggest pursuing individual and organizational capabilities in tandem, encouraging collaboration between representatives and the company. Finally, they remind sales leaders to focus on driving the demand for training and on reinforcing behaviors through coaching to produce better learning and development results.
In the second section, Dixon and Adamson focus on ways that marketing leaders can improve their messaging to align with the Challenger Selling Model. First, they advise marketing to withhold any mention of “customer centricity” due to the phrase’s saturation and its ineffectiveness in growing businesses. Next, they remind marketing to teach for differentiation from competitors in the market. Finally, they advise avoiding 10 words and phrases that commonly appear on pitch decks and undermine the customer’s perception of the supplier company. In their place, the authors remind marketers to lead with compelling insights that lead to the supplier solution.
In the third section, the authors address executives by encouraging them to remain persistent in the face of opposition to the Challenger Selling Model. Acknowledging that there will always be resistance during the early adoption phase, the authors highlight the need to make exceptions for the sake of organizational transformation, including for sales representatives who insist on meeting their benchmarks their own way. In anticipation of the sales team minority that will likely leave in response to the model’s adoption, the authors advise senior leaders to focus on equipping the remaining sales force with Challenger behaviors. They also suggest deploying the Challenger Selling Model in a pilot program to address challenges and adoption plateaus as soon as possible.
Senior leaders should capitalize on the provocative nature of the Challenger profile messaging. The cognitive dissonance that arises from seeing the Challenger model clash with traditional approaches enables individuals to accept the adoption as a process of change and adjustment. The only time sales leaders might ever need to adjust the messaging is when the audience finds the specific language used to describe Challengers disconcerting; this insight resonates with the need to tailor the conversation to the customer. Finally, the authors urge executives to start as soon as possible when adopting the Challenger Selling Model, as it is a long-term solution that requires organizational overhaul and plenty of time to yield fruitful results.
Dixon and Adamson recall a 2009 presentation of the SEC’s Challenger findings, where a tech sales leader raised the approach’s applicability in business functions other than sales. The Afterword focuses on some of the SEC’s discoveries that relate to this insight.
Across human resources and information technology, the SEC discovered that internal customers have the same expectations for other business functions that market customers do; both seek strategic advice and new perspectives for their business needs rather than an outright solution.
When sales representatives lead with solution delivery, they align more with the Relationship Builder, an “order taker” who waits to hear the customer’s short-term concerns before offering solutions. The authors suggest purposefully breaking out of this pattern by finding opportunities to deliver more value to the customer, becoming a consultative partner rather than an order taker. Companies can target the customer’s performance gaps and match the solution’s capabilities to these. This logic can be applied internally to strategy, research and development, and procurement.
Some functions likewise struggle to communicate effectively with their business partners, especially where technical jargon represents a barrier to effectively diagnosing issues and solutions. In areas like legal, companies can enlist the help of communications experts to tailor their messaging for different audiences.
Finally, to assert the credibility of a business function in the face of other units and business partners, the authors suggest identifying opportunities that will position the unit as a strategic advisor. Referring to the market research function at one tech company, they list several criteria for such organizational issues, aligned with Chapter 5’s SAFE-BOLD Framework.
The authors close by discussing the high demand for the Corporate Executive Board’s consultative skills programs. While they admit the difficulty of predicting how these demands might change in the long run, they speculate that the need for suppliers who can reduce spending or generate more income will remain consistent across internal and external customers. They theorize that the Challenger Selling Model speaks to the desire of many business functions to seek an alternative to the status quo.
The last three chapters of The Challenger Sale move away from the sales representative on the frontline to focus on various levels of leadership, especially as they influence both model adoption and the effectiveness of the Challenger Selling Model. These topics reflect The Importance of Organizational Synergy while underscoring The Rewards of Embracing Discomfort and hinting at The Evolving Nature of Business and Its Methods.
As the closest supervisor to the sales representative, the sales manager represents the organization’s frontline leadership, executing Challenger strategies on the most direct level. Sales managers fulfill three key functions with respect to the sales representative: selling, coaching, and owning. Although selling and coaching require the manager to engage with customers and sales representatives, owning considers the stake the manager holds as a leader in the organization. Essentially, they are operating in tandem with the corporate leadership by allocating resources and innovating strategies that overcome the most significant roadblocks to a sale. This creates a feedback loop within the Challenger organization: Sales representatives report these roadblocks to managers, managers innovate and consult the organization to create paths of engagement, and the organization adapts this feedback into the insight, as well as the performance standards, that it reworks for sales deployment. Through the sales manager, the book completes the arc of organizational synergy, underlining that the model engages organizational capabilities just as much as it engages individual ones.
The manager’s capacity for innovation—their knowledge of how to embrace risk and adapt to the situation—has similarly systemic effects. High-performing managers are never content with just one solution path, the authors argue, instead finding multiple ways to circumvent an obstacle in case one doesn’t work as intended. The risk is mitigated by the knowledge that back-up plans exist. Hence, the manager confidently leads the sales representative back into the frontline. The manager’s other key activities, selling and coaching, provide sales representatives with models for emulation, supporting training activities that impart high-performing behaviors.
The courage to embrace risk must also exist past the managerial level; Dixon and Adamson encourage business leaders to value sales effectiveness over efficiency, improving on what the organization already does well. The temptation for organizations to remain in their comfort zone can be strong, especially in turbulent times (e.g., the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, when the book was first published). However, focusing on efficiency produces static sales trends while innovating for effectiveness allows the organization to perform on a curve. A culture that embraces the risk of innovation and effectiveness reaps a greater reward, the authors suggest.
By addressing marketing leaders and all senior leaders, Chapter 9 also furthers the idea that the whole organization is involved in the transformative model adoption process. Tellingly, the marketing guidance the book provides revolves largely around restrictive behaviors—common marketing practices that undercut the sales representative rather than support them. These practices echo the clash between the hard sell and valuable insight, which suggests that in the Challenger model, marketing should generally strengthen its capability as a research arm. As for senior leaders, the guidance anticipates the long-term nature of the adoption process. The authors stress the likelihood of sales representative casualties, rejection of the model, and cultural barriers. Taken together, these lessons speak to the organization’s movement of the organization out of its comfort zone to reap better results. Just as the individual sales representative builds their Challenger skillset, so does the organization build its Challenger capabilities.
Once again deploying the Challenger method themselves, the authors “scale” this question of transformation just a little more in the Afterword by reflecting on the selling model’s applicability outside the sales function. Applying the Challenger model to areas such as legal and procurement suggests that these areas of business are evolving as well, opening the door to new tools that suit their specific needs. Although the authors do not definitively suggest that these functions can adopt the Challenger model wholesale, they suggest that the model raises possibilities for new areas of study. With its discussion of internal customers and suppliers, the Afterword also suggests that the tools necessary to transform the business are inherent capabilities. The organization therefore functions as a microcosm for sales leaders to understand the B2B market.