logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Elena Armas

The American Roommate Experiment

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Risk-Taking, Loss, and Recovery

Despite pursuing an experimental relationship with no strings attached, Rosie and Lucas’s dynamic centers on taking risks. When they meet, both are uncertain of their futures, grappling with change and trauma. Through love for Lucas, Rosie learns to accept emotional risks, while Lucas comes to terms with his mental health needs and search for purpose. The American Roommate Experiment opens with Rosie struggling with anxiety—afraid of disappointing her father, worried for her younger brother, and overwhelmed by her book deadline. She is uncomfortable with her loss of control (albeit of her own making), her decision to “chase dreams that [are] nothing more than ink on paper” (28). Still, she takes a similar risk when she accepts Lucas’s proposal of experimental dates, knowing that they might not solve her writer’s block and that she could end up falling for her crush. Rosie comes to love Lucas not despite what he has endured, but because all his experiences make him who he is. She comforts him after his nightmares and panic attacks, knowing “there [is] nothing about Lucas that need[s] fixing” (292). She brings Taco, Lucas’s beloved dog, to New York, a demonstration of devotion and argument that he deserves whatever he needs to heal from his accident-related trauma. As Lucas helps her feel more confident in herself and her writing, Rosie extends the same grace to him. Rosie’s grand gesture at the airport, the opposite of a logical calculation, demonstrates that she has fully embraced a life dedicated to self-expression. She does not regret this choice, underlining that who she has become is unchanged by Lucas’s initial refusal to accept her love.

Lucas, while otherwise friendly and open, avoids any discussion of his recent past. He refrains from telling Rosie why he missed Lina’s wedding “[b]ecause how [does] one finish a statement that represent[s] everything they [are] running away from?” (43). He only explains his panic attacks to Rosie when she asks, and no one else in his family, including Lina, understands the depth of his recent loss—as it ended his career. Guided by his understanding of masculinity, Lucas attempts to ignore his leg injury, upset that he cannot physically defend Rosie or help move her belongings back to her apartment. He sees himself as unworthy of Rosie due to his aimlessness: During his and Rosie’s reunion on New Year’s Eve, he admits, “I was left without the single thing I knew how to do, without the person I knew how to be” (377). Inspired by Rosie’s faith and book, Lucas commits not only to recovery but also new career in cooking. In returning to her, he not only alleviates her grief but also demonstrates that he now understands his own.

Imposter Syndrome and Authenticity

Both Rosie and Lucas doubt their own talents and suitability for each other and find these doubts impacting other relationships in their lives. As their initial attraction becomes a fully developed romance, they find ways to be honest about their goals—with themselves and others. Elena Armas uses the fake dating trope to argue that when real emotions emerge from an experiment, the positive impact has a ripple effect. Early on, Rosie avoids transparency with almost everyone she meets. She even has trouble revealing her flooded apartment to Lucas, insisting the hole in her ceiling is a “plumbing issue, nothing that can’t be fixed” (18). She is so dedicated to self-reliance and being a source of strength for others that it leads her to deception: After her career change, she fails to tell her father and brother about it and acknowledges “what a hypocrite [she is] for demanding the truth when all [she does is] keep secrets” (170). Regarding her career change, Rosie fears disappointing her father (who takes pride in her engineering job) and not living up to her new job as a romance writer (as she struggles to write her second book). She exhibits imposter syndrome, a phenomenon in which someone doubts their abilities and feels fraudulent and undeserving of praise or their place in life. However, Lucas and Lina are persistent in their belief in Rosie’s writing talent, and it is Lucas’s dating experiment that ends her writer’s block.

Rosie and Lucas’s experimental dates reveal not only the extent of Lucas’s doubts but also the depth of their bond. On their first date, the two share their dating histories, complete with comedic mishaps. On their second date, Lucas tells Rosie the truth about his leg injury, leading to a moment of romantic tension so incendiary that they literally burn their dinner. On their third date, Lucas admits, “I’m not running angel. Some days I’m barely even moving” (264). While Rosie becomes certain of herself—and of her love for Lucas—he cannot accept himself as part of her future. While Lucas can acknowledge the real emotions born of their experiment, he cannot accept Rosie’s faith in him; this conflict is in line with imposter syndrome, as he sees himself as a fraudulent love interest. He is similarly skeptical of Alexia’s suggestion that he attend culinary school, so caught up in grief over his loss of career (as a professional surfer) that he cannot acknowledge his other talents; this conflict is not quite the same as imposter syndrome but does prey on his lack of self-worth. By the end of the novel, both Rosie and Lucas tell Lina the truth about their arrangement and love. Rosie tells her father about Lucas and her career change, realizing that “without honesty, without truth, [they] never lived fully” (355). After a phone call with Lina, Lucas reevaluates his own worth and reinvents himself. In the end, Armas demonstrates that accepting familial and romantic love helps people live as their best selves.

Tensions Between Romantic Narratives and Real Life

Rosie, as a romance writer, is interested in what makes a successful love story. Lucas becomes invested in her success, creating a dating experiment to help her with her writer’s block and prove there is more to romance than her lackluster dating history. When Lucas’s four dates fail to meet his perfectionist standards, he struggles, while Rosie embraces the challenges. The novel’s metaliterary use of romantic narratives highlights both characters’ emotional journeys. During Rosie and Lucas’s first date, Rosie clashes with Lucas’s expectations by picking ABBA’s upbeat “Dancing Queen” as their soundtrack; the date unexpectedly ends with him escorting a rat out of the apartment. Still, Rosie finds herself making use of the date—“transforming those thoughts into words on the page” (174). During her and Lucas’s second date, he castigates himself for letting their pizzas burn, even when Rosie voices her enjoyment of the date. In these moments, Lucas is caught up in gendered expectations, his role as a fitting love interest and protector because he is a man. Despite being a romantic at heart, Rosie appreciates his efforts over his results. On their third date, they imagine an alternate meet-cute, but Rosie ultimately expresses her real emotions, telling Lucas, “I’m crying because we’re just friends, because none of this is real” (274). Lucas assures her otherwise, finally kissing her and voicing his real desire. In this moment, the contrived experiment has achieved a concrete result, forcing the pair to be vulnerable. Rosie brings her romantic narrative to life in other ways by completing her manuscript and using her real romance to deepen her understanding of relationships. After Lucas helps her rescue Olly, Rosie realizes her books did not prepare her for the reality that love could “also be about the peace it brought you […] and for all the romances [she’d] read, and the one, almost two, [she’d] written, [she] hadn’t known that” (289). While Lucas strives for narrative perfection in designing his dates, Rosie becomes content with the messiness of lived experience.

Lucas’s rejection of Rosie’s grand gesture at the airport seems to argue against the reality of romantic narratives. However, Rosie’s chagrin is “not because [she] regret[s] it—[she’d] do it again” (358), as if to underscore that her relationship and writing taught her courage. Lina inspires courage in Lucas by framing Rosie’s book as a love letter to him. By the novel’s end, Lucas shares Rosie’s faith, showing up on New Year’s Eve to share his concrete plans for a new life. The final grand gesture falls to him not because of his gender, but because he must decide to grow and change. Armas replicates Rosie and Lucas’s first meeting in the Epilogue, assuring readers that the couple have come full circle and their relationship is now secure.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text