62 pages • 2 hours read
David BaldacciA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
At age 32, Travis Devine maintains a daily regimen: boarding the 6:20 am train from Mount Kisco to Manhattan. His attire, an off-the-rack suit paired with a persistently wrinkled white shirt, belies his preference for denim or military dress. His constant companion, a dual-screen encrypted laptop, serves as a tool of his employment at Cowl and Comely. He has exchanged military combat for financial battles against corporate competitors. His living arrangement is a townhouse he shares with three roommates. In his family life, Devine is overshadowed by his elder siblings, Danny and Claire, who excel in their respective professions. Devine’s parents, notably disengaged, expressed open discontent with his military aspirations, despite his acceptance into West Point and subsequent time as a US Army Ranger. His involuntary departure from military service caused his life path to change, and his current role in finance is a self-inflicted punishment for an undisclosed transgression during his time as an Army Ranger.
As his commute takes him past the homes of the wealthy, which he refers to as “palaces,” Devine is privy to a recurring spectacle: the view of a private pool behind one of the mansions, which is frequently occupied by the swimming figure of a character who will later be introduced as Michelle Montgomery. Today’s encounter is more intimate, as Montgomery disrobes completely before her swim, an act witnessed not only by Devine but also by other passengers. Although he is surprised by her nakedness, Devine also senses an underlying disquiet about Montgomery.
At his place of work, Devine receives a cryptic email on his personal email account announcing the death of Sara Ewes, a 28-year-old colleague. Although the prior romantic liaison between Devine and Ewes was brief, his attempts to probe the mysterious sender’s identity are thwarted by technological barriers. The building, vast and secretive, especially the clandestine “Area 51” on the 51st floor, becomes even more impenetrable when Devine is barred from the floor above, where Ewes worked. Longtime Cowl and Comely employee Wanda Simms emerges and claims that Ewes died by suicide. This news ignites in Devine a need to unravel the cause of her death.
The homeward journey on the evening train mimics the morning’s, slowing at the same locality. Observing the festivities at the Cowl residence, Devine notes the presence of Brad Cowl, owner of both the residence and the company for which Devine works, Cowl and Comely. The dichotomy of Devine’s feelings is apparent: a blend of envy of Cowl’s wealth and a hope to never emulate such a lifestyle. Devine’s father’s approval of his post-military academic pursuit now seems hollow to him.
New York Police Department (NYPD) Detective Karl Hancock intercepts Devine post-commute with inquiries into his military background and his acquaintance with Ewes. Devine downplays their connection and responds to questions about his employer with detachment. Hancock questions the job’s suitability for an elite ex-soldier like Devine, and Devine responds with silence.
The journey with Detective Hancock ends at Devine’s modest residence, chosen for its affordability and relative closeness to nature. The conversation inside the residence, which Devine shares with three roommates, shifts to their commutes. Inside, his housemates are as varied as their professions: Will Valentine is a Russian cybersecurity expert; Helen Speers is preoccupied with her legal studies; and Jill Tapshaw is the creator of a dating platform called Hummingbird, which she has persuaded Devine to invest in. That evening, a mysterious federal agent named Emerson Campbell interrupts Devine’s routine, demanding his compliance.
Campbell, a figure with military ties, reveals that he has been conducting extensive surveillance on Devine, even orchestrating his current living situation for convenient rendezvous such as this. The conversation takes a serious turn as Campbell discloses a military scandal involving Devine and another officer, with fatal consequences now shrouded under a guise of suicide. Campbell offers Devine a stark choice: Participate in an investigation into Cowl and Comely or confront the legal repercussions of his culpability in the accidental death during his time as an Army Ranger. Their dialogue encompasses the recent death of Sara Ewes and the broader investigation into the company by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Special Projects.
The opening chapters establish the character of protagonist Travis Devine, who is in many ways an outsider to the Wall Street milieu in which he now lives. Like all the other central characters, Devine is consistently referred to by his surname—a stylistic choice that links the novel with the conventions of narrative nonfiction and reportage, creating the appearance of narrative objectivity.
The novel’s title, The 6:20 Man, evokes Devine’s search for identity: Reeling from a series of traumatic experiences in the military, Devine takes refuge in the impersonal identity of a tireless company man—the sort of employee who is always among the first to arrive at the office and the last to leave. As the story progresses, it becomes clear that Devine’s intense discipline comes from different motivations than that of his colleagues. He is not particularly interested in the Competitive Ambition that drives other members of the firm, and he happily takes his lunch in the dining room while others eat at their desks to perform dedication. Instead, he is seeking a replacement for the discipline of his former career in the military—a way to insulate himself from the traumas of that experience. The title encapsulates the essence of Devine’s character while also setting the temporal stage for the unfolding of the novel’s plot.
Devine’s meticulous morning rituals and his immaculately maintained but inexpensive footwear are not merely character quirks; they are the vestiges of a military discipline that continues to define his civilian existence. These exaggerated characteristics crystallize into a representation of a man grappling with the rigor and regimentation of his past life.
As the narrative unfolds, other characters, such as Will Valentine, are painted with broad strokes that evoke cultural stereotypes. Valentine’s Russian heritage and predilection for fast food, along with his hacking skills, construct a persona that is at once a nod to and a critique of popular American representations of post-Cold War immigrants. The narrative seems to question whether Valentine is authentically embodying his cultural background or merely performing an identity shaped by cultural tropes. When Valentine is first introduced in Chapter 6, the narrator says, “Devine could never tell if the guy knew he was playing a Hollywood version of a Russian now free in America, or if he really was like that” (25).
The architecture of a thriller novel is supported by subtle clues, some of which are misleading. These intentionally misleading clues are known as red herrings, named for the practice of dragging rotten fish across a path to throw dogs off the scent. Such careful manipulation of the reader’s expectations is a hallmark of the mystery-thriller genre, with the author shaping events and characters to steer the story toward its denouement while keeping the reader engaged in The Search for Truth alongside the protagonist.
The recurring motif of the train slowing by Cowl’s house, for example, is a narrative device that may at first seem coincidental but is later revealed to be crucial to the plot. The placement of Devine’s residence in Mount Kisco serves as a narrative pivot, initially presented as happenstance but later unveiled as a cog in a larger machination.
Backstories are woven into the fabric of the narrative through introspection and dialogue. In interrogating Devine in Chapter 7, Campbell recites Devine’s military history in detail, including an incident in which Devine was responsible for the death of another soldier named Hawkins. The effect of this dialogue is twofold: It serves Campbell’s purpose by intimidating Devine, and it serves the purpose of the narrative by making this backstory available to the reader. In Chapter 6, Devine reflects on his family history, his sense that his father was always disappointed in him, and his own guilt over Hawkins’s death. These ruminations provide insight into Devine’s psyche and the motivations for his current, self-punishing work routine.
The narrative employs these literary devices not merely for the progression of the plot but as a reflective surface for The Search for Truth. Campbell deliberately misrepresents Devine’s story to manipulate him. Stung by this experience, Devine feels a deep need to find out the truth about what happened to Sara Ewes to save her from being similarly misrepresented. The formal structure of the novel, replete with detailed character studies and orchestrated narrative developments, beckons the reader to delve into a sophisticated analysis of its thematic core and stylistic elements.
By David Baldacci