logo

60 pages 2 hours read

Chrystal D. Giles

Take Back the Block

Fiction | Novel | Middle Grade | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Impact of Gentrification on Communities

Take Back the Block illustrates the many different effects that gentrification has on communities and does not shy away from presenting the more hidden, negative aspects that occur. Most importantly, the novel is designed to inject a note of hope and declare that existing communities can find a way prevail or at least survive in the face of gentrification. Some of gentrification’s effects are physical and fairly obvious, such as the demolition of older neighborhoods and buildings to make way for newer, fancier dwellings and shops that appeal to affluent, upper-class, and/or white residents. Gentrification also involves the physical displacement of community members, many of whom are working-class and/or people of color, and this dynamic contributes to shifting racial and class demographics in affected neighborhoods. However, not all of gentrification’s effects are visible or immediately evident, and the author implies that the less obvious effects can be just as harmful. For example, the novel shows how gentrification can also contribute to the dissolution of friendships, families, and communities and cause bitter arguments. Additionally, the process often affects unexpected changes in academic or work environments and causes self-esteem issues among the displaced. In more serious examples, police misconduct, racial unrest, and even decreased levels of safety can occur. Despite these hardships that often result from gentrification, Take Back the Block suggests that communities can survive gentrification and continue to thrive, even if changes occur in the neighborhood and some community members are forced to move away.

Through Mr. Baker’s article, the novel likens gentrification to segregation because it renovates neighborhoods that were once havens for working-class people and/or people of color and alters them to appeal to new, more affluent residents. Although these renovations may seem harmless or even positive at first glance, the novel shows that they are actually harmful because what allows them to exist is the displacement of original, underprivileged residents. For example, although Wes is pleased with the new milkshake shop near where Kari used to live, he reflects, “I was starting to wonder what would happen if the Oaks got redeveloped. Would our street be the latest home to a bunch of stores that let you build your own pizza, bake your own doughnuts, and blend your own organic fruit smoothies?” (56). A new milkshake shop seems nice unless it has replaced someone’s former home, thereby displacing that person and sending their life into chaos. This concept is revisited later in the novel, for when discussing the changes to a nearby high school, Mr. Reggie says, “What bothers me is all these improvements to the school happened when the rich white people moved in. […] It wasn’t until we moved out and they moved in that someone spent some money to update the place” (181). This observation reveals the fact that racism and segregation are often intertwined with gentrification. Whereas nobody bothered to fix the school when it was mostly populated with Black students, the shift to a mostly white demographic resulted in quick improvements to the school, which the displaced Black students won’t benefit from. In this sense, gentrification does not really improve the communities it claims to improve; instead, it maintains racialized income gaps and different levels of access to quality education while simply moving communities to different geographical locations.

Beyond the obvious physical effects, gentrification also damages Wes’s community because it results in police misconduct, causes people to argue, and threatens to disintegrate long-standing friendships, such as those between Wes, Kari, and Brent. Fortunately, however, the boys’ triumphs over the novel’s “villain” of gentrification are proof of the resilience, power, and significance in the same communities that gentrification seeks to tear apart. The most prominent example of the problems involved occurs when unfamiliar, white officers start patrolling Kensington Oaks and the surrounding area, treating the Black residents with suspicion and taking Kari into custody for no reason. This incident and the underlying shift in dynamics threaten the safety of the residents, for the police are acting against the community instead of serving and protecting it. Another example occurs when Kari has to move again and switch schools, which causes him to suffer emotionally and get into more fights, illustrating some of the unexpected interpersonal effects that gentrification can have. However, when Wes’s family steps in to help Kari and reminds him that he still has a place in their community, this gesture illustrates the power of communities to rise above the negative effects of gentrification.

The Significance of Community and Cultural Heritage

The specter of gentrification poses significant threats to Wes’s community, but ultimately, the novel suggests that the forces of community and cultural heritage are often stronger than gentrification, especially if individuals fight to protect those communities and heritages. Because Wes’s community of Kensington Oaks is so special, he and others work hard to protect it and make significant strides towards doing so, even getting the neighborhood registered as a national historic place. Despite these strides, Wes and his companions cannot completely prevent gentrification from changing Kensington Oaks, but the true power of the community is shown through its resilience and triumph in spite of partial gentrification and other hardships.

At first, Wes is motivated to save his community because it holds special significance to him as an individual. As he reflects:

The Oaks is my home. I’ve done everything here—met my best friends, learned how to ride a bike, made my first three-pointer on the court at the park, and had so many epic hide-and-seek games… Flashes of all my favorite memories popped into my mind—a highlight reel of my life. How could I leave all that? (51).

This quote shows that at this point, Wes’s dedication to the community is mostly rooted in self-interest, and he overlooks the ramifications of gentrification for the rest of the community. Later, after his efforts succeed, Wes finally realizes, “It wasn’t just about saving my house. It was about Mr. Pippin and Mr. Hank, Alyssa and her mom, the Silvas, and everyone else who loved the Oaks as much as I did” (218). By saving the community, Wes develops a better understanding of what “community” really is—the group of people who help each other to thrive, rather than his own house or a park. As such, the reason for saving the community matters is because everyone (not just Wes) benefits from his efforts.

Early in the novel, Wes’s parents argue that it is important to save Kensington Oaks in order to preserve their history and cultural heritage. At first, Wes doesn’t understand why this matters, but later, he uncovers the secret history of Frederick Pippin and comes to realize the power of sharing stories of Black success and joy, especially in a world that often erases such stories. To unveil the new park, Wes says:

I’m happy to name this park after a man who deserves to have his legacy remembered. Mr. Pippin created a village here for families just like us; this space is part of our history, and I’m glad that future generations will enjoy it and remember him (224).

This connection to the past strengthens and enlarges Wes’s community. His discovery of the area’s important history allows him to obtain certain protections for the community as a national historic place. Additionally, this connection to history immortalizes the community and serves as a reminder of Black empowerment, honoring the people who persevered in the past and those who will persevere in the future despite various threats of erasure. The act of uncovering Pippin’s secret history mirrors the act of saving Kensington Oaks from extinction, and both acts are testaments to the importance and strength of the community.

The Importance of Youth Activism and Leadership

Even though he is young, Wes makes considerable strides in his social justice and community improvement projects. At times, he believes that adults are more knowledgeable, more powerful, and better equipped to enact important change, so he questions why he is involved in certain projects or “fights.” However, when it comes to saving Kensington Oaks from being purchased and demolished by Simmons, Wes makes progress that nobody else could have made, demonstrating the unique power of youth to contribute to social justice projects and activism.

At the beginning of the novel, Wes attends protests and volunteer events because his parents insist upon it, but by the end, he does so of his own accord and in his own way, demonstrating his commitment to social justice and his leadership qualities. At first, protesting the construction of a luxury condo to replace Kari’s old apartment building, Wes is “tired of fighting battles that didn’t have anything to do with [him]” (2). He also worries that he will never be as good a leader as his mother is because he doesn’t share all of her qualities. However, once he learns what gentrification is, he realizes that it has everything to do with him, even if it’s not his building being destroyed or replaced; he decides that he really does belong at the center of this fight, as his mother suggested all along. However, the unique ways in which Wes joins the fight are specific to him as an individual, illustrating how he uses his creativity and innovative strategies to strengthen his leadership abilities.

When Kensington Oaks faces extinction at the hands of Simmons, the same development group that purchased Kari’s building, many adults feel that saving Kensington Oaks would be impossible or extremely unlikely. However, Wes refuses to give up so easily and starts building creative strategies that improve the situation. As Ms. Monica points out, “This wouldn’t have happened without Wesley and his stellar research” (208). Many adults want to sell their houses because they could make money this way, but because Wes is unburdened by financial hardships or financial responsibilities, he is able to develop the unique perspective that preserving the community is more important than obtaining money. Additionally, some adult residents feel that fighting against Simmons is pointless because the company will be relentless, but as an energetic child who hasn’t yet faced such a relentless opponent, Wes is able to match the development company’s dedication and time commitment, which is invaluable to his success. The adults do not think of getting Kensington Oaks designated as a national historic place because to their knowledge, there is nothing of historical significance there, but Wes digs beneath the surface until he discovers the true origin story of Kensington Oaks. As a child, Wes is used to learning new things because he doesn’t believe that he already knows everything, and thanks to his mom’s past as a librarian, he has impeccable research skills, so he is more willing than most adults to dig into past records. He also has more faith that he might find something useful. Wes’s optimism, open-mindedness, and willingness to learn ultimately pay off, illustrating that young activists and leaders can bring unique talents and abilities to the table.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Chrystal D. Giles