logo

38 pages 1 hour read

Mychal Denzel Smith

Stakes is High: Life After the American Dream

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 4 Summary: “Freedom”

Smith opens the essay by telling the story of Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman to campaign for president. Chisholm, born of immigrant parents, was elected to Congress, representing New York’s 12th District, then campaigned for the Democratic nomination in 1972, losing the race to George McGovern. McGovern would eventually lose in a landslide to the incumbent Richard Nixon, who two years later would resign as a result of the Watergate scandal. Smith admits that he wonders what would have happened had Chisholm been elected, but then reminds himself of the reality of America, a country with a “history of antagonism toward black people, women, and immigrants” (141). Smith contrasts the unlikelihood of Chisholm’s win with the inevitability of Donald Trump, who clearly represents America’s long line of “wealthy white men whose primary concern was ownership and control of the land from which they drew their wealth” (141).

What Chisholm and Trump have in common, however, is that they are both New Yorkers. Smith then goes into telling his own New York story, having moved from Virginia in pursuit of his dreams. Like his family’s past generations, Smith left in pursuit of opportunity. Smith’s reflections about his family lead to him telling the story of Pleasant Lampkins, his great-great-great grandfather, who was born enslaved in 1836. Smith ponders on Pleasant’s life, considering the parallels between them, the inevitable connection of family and history, and of course the experience of being Black in America.

Denying the stories of people like Lampkins, according to Smith, “leaves you with delusions of your own making” (152). Smith admits to hoping for someone like Chisholm to come along, in messiah-like fashion to fix America of its maladies. At the same time, Smith returns to his critique of the overinflation of the importance associated to politicians, even to politicians he admires, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The takeaway from Ocasio-Cortez’s example “should not be more exceptionalism, more mythmaking” (155). Instead, Ocasio-Cortez’s story should serve as fuel to realize that Congress could be filled with Ocasio-Cortezes, which would result in both representational and material progress.

In the meantime, Smith argues that America must tell the truth about itself. This is not a true democracy, where free people seek friendship and solutions based on human compassion. This is the country that finds genocide and racist violence at its very core foundation, so believing anything else is misguided. Smith ends the essay by bringing up De La Soul’s 1996 song and album, “Stakes is High,” which also provides the book with its title. The song emphasizes the urgency of the moment, all the while leaving room for dreaming about what life could be. As Smith puts it, “Stakes is high, and what little time we have left can no longer be spent on preserving our mythical selves. We must be willing to lose our old story. We must choose us” (170). This choice for the collective well-being over insistence on the idea of individualism is what Smith deems necessary for America to fully accomplish what it claims it already has: freedom.

Part 4 Analysis

In this essay, Smith focuses on the two primary heroes of the work: Shirley Chisholm and Pleasant Lampkins. In order to be consistent with his previous comments about the overinflation of the importance of politicians or individual people within the larger framework of American history, he makes sure to qualify his stories about each of these people. In the case of Chisholm, despite the ironic juxtaposition Smith creates with the comparison to Donald Trump, Smith tells the story of a Black woman who realized the need for systemic change.

Her campaign for president, while serious beyond the realm of mere symbolism, is historically significant to this day. Smith is careful, though, to not fall into the same trap he believes is actually more harmful than good, as seen in this passage:

I catch myself hatching the thought that Chisholm would have needed to be president for these truths to resonate. It tells me that I’ve bought in to the thinking that turns the president into a messiah capable of saving the wretched from themselves (153).

Smith then provides a more contemporary example of this thinking, as many have cast Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez into the messiah role as well.

As Smith shifts his attention to Pleasant Lampkins, his great-great-great grandfather, he reflects on who Pleasant was, speculating on the intentions behind his actions. Pleasant’s story provides a historical and familial context for Smith’s life, which first and foremost is comprised of being Black in America. Here, the title of the essay “Freedom” serves as tragic irony, alluding both to the fact that Pleasant was born enslaved and to his eventual emancipation. Freedom is therefore a word that hangs in the air, inviting the reader to question what freedom is, and whether or not America is in reality a place where freedom reigns.

Smith’s revelation of the book’s title, tying it to De La Soul’s song, is a subtle admission that the truth about America is constructed through collaboration, not by turning to one person to unlock some ultimate truth. Smith is earnest in his proposal to the reader to “choose us,” foregoing individualism as the modus operandi, in favor of our collective well-being.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text