58 pages • 1 hour read
D. H. LawrenceA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Sons and Lovers, the characters tread a constant line between immediate internal emotions and reserved expressions of these emotions. To the outside world, Paul seems quiet and introspective. Inside, however, his emotions are constantly raging between love for his mother, loathing for his father, and an artistic yearning to experience every sensation possible. His parents’ marriage presents a similar dynamic to the outside world. Walter and Gertrude hate one another, but they stay together and allow the outside world to assume that they are typically affectionate for one another. To the outside world, they are a traditional man and wife. Inside the house, however, they hate each other with an immediacy and an intensity that is hidden from the public view. The immediacy of emotion affects every character, but they hide the immediacy of their emotions from the world. In the restrained English society of the late 1800s and early 1900s, such displays of emotional honesty are considered gauche and unsuitable. As such, everything in society is predicated on the obfuscation of honest emotion, from individuals like Paul to couples like Gertrude and Walter.
Paul and Miriam bond over their intense emotions. As an artist, Paul is enraptured by the natural world around him. This artistic temperament is expressed in his extreme loathing for his father and his extreme affection for his mother. These emotions are always felt in the most extreme and immediate manner possible; every loving gesture from his mother is a reminder of his devout adoration, while every misstep from his father is a demonstration of exactly why he deserves to be hated in such an intense manner. Paul rarely feels shallow emotions; everything is immediate and intense. He translates this intense emotionality into his art, which becomes popular and financially rewarding. He finds a sympathetic mind in Miriam, who grew up surrounded by brothers who bullied her and who learns to inwardly feel very similar emotions, especially in relation to the natural world. Paul expresses this immediate emotional connection to the world through his art, while Miriam expresses her emotionality through her desire to touch and comprehend everything. Over the course of their relationship, however, Paul comes to resent Miriam’s similar experience of emotions. He criticizes her for doing everything so intensely, as this breaches his expectation that immediate and intense emotions should remain hidden from the world. Paul’s resentment of Miriam’s emotions manifests as a criticism of her social decorum, as she is able to comprehend her emotions in a way that he cannot. Paul’s art functions as an outlet for his emotions, but he never truly comprehends them. He is mired in an overwhelming flood of emotions that he cannot understand, so he resents Miriam for reminding him of the immediacy of his emotions.
Paul’s affection for his mother manifests in small gestures. From excited chatter about her purchases, to the stroking of her hair and fingers, to the claims that he wants to live with her for the rest of his life, Paul rarely acknowledges the intimacy that he shares with his mother. Often, he feels so overwhelmed by this intense and immediate love that he must touch his mother or tell her that he loves her. At the end of her life, he accelerates her death and ends her suffering. Even the gesture of putting morphine into her milk stems from his intense love for her, as he cannot bear to see her in pain. The immediacy of Paul’s affection is ultimately what ends Gertrude’s life.
The Oedipus complex is a psychological theory, developed by Sigmund Freud, that posits that a child will develop sexual desire for the parent of the opposite sex and will thereby seek to displace their other parent. In Sons and Lovers, the relationship between Gertrude and her sons can be considered Oedipal. First, William demonstrates a strong affection for his mother and—at one point—tries to fight his father. Second, Paul displaces William after William’s death and develops an even more emotionally intense relationship with their mother, one in which he symbolically replaces his father by becoming the primary earner in the household and the one in charge of many domestic responsibilities. There is no question that neither William nor Paul feels anything other than utter adoration for their mother. They both loathe their father, resenting him not only for his abuse but also for his continual presence in their lives. Gertrude reciprocates their love, showering her sons with affection to the point that their devotion is noted by other people. Walter, the loathed father figure who is displaced over the course of the novel, comes closest to directly addressing the Oedipal nature of his sons’ relationships with their mother. On one occasion, he returns home to find Paul and Gertrude in each other’s arms. He offers a wry comment on whatever “mischief” they happen to be getting up to and then slinks away to bed (198). Other than this comment, however, the intense passion between mothers and sons is largely limited to gestures and internal emotion.
William begins the novel as Gertrude’s undisputed favorite. In the opening chapter, he buys her egg cups as a token of his affection for her. Gradually, however, he slips away from her. He develops relationships with other women and removes himself to London. When William dies, Gertrude feels responsible. She loved him so intensely but allowed him to slip away. She slips into a deep depression, only rousing from her grief when she is able to help Paul recover from a similar sickness. With William gone, Paul takes up his mantle as the favored son. Gertrude’s relationship with Paul is even more intense, as though she will not allow Paul to slip through her fingers as William did. She makes him entirely emotionally dependent on her, criticizing his other relationships to the point where loving anyone else feels like an inconceivable betrayal. Paul sleeps in the same bed as his mother, feeling her warmth against his body. He is always thinking about their intimacy and casting his love into the future, imagining them together for many years to come at the expense of any other woman in his life. When they take trips together, he enjoys imagining them as a pair of lovers on an adventure. Paul has no interest in a career or being rich. He has no real interest in a future with Clara or Miriam, as all he really wants is to live with his mother. In an Oedipal sense, his only ambition is to be with his mother in a house of his own, where he has replaced his father and has his mother all to himself.
The relationship between Paul and Gertrude is, ultimately, destructive. Through her affection, she destroys any chance of him being happy with either Miriam or Clara and is quick to make him feel guilt and shame for having any affection for another woman. With respect to Miriam, Gertrude is conscious of her actions. She feels jealous that Paul is spending time with Miriam, so she actively disparages Miriam. Though she is more affectionate to Clara, this is based on Gertrude’s belief that their pairing is doomed and that Paul will inevitably come back to her. Paul returns to Gertrude as she is dying. He cannot watch her suffer, so he euthanizes his beloved mother. This act is the final expression of his Oedipal love, a gesture of affection that is as caring—in his mind—as any kiss or hug.
While Sons and Lovers focuses on Paul’s relationship with his mother, the other women in his life allow the narrative to explore The Role of Women in English society. The novel takes place during a period of increasing awareness of women’s rights. Though not yet successful, advocacy groups railed against the marginalization of women and the social expectations placed upon them. Such expectations were beginning to change, however, as evidenced in the cross-generational differences among the women in Paul’s life. Gertrude belongs to a previous generation. As a young girl, she had big ambitions, but these were limited by a failed marriage that she felt that she could not leave. The social pressures of being a divorced or separated woman were too great, especially as she would not have custody of her children (as custody would revert to the father). In contrast, Clara has been separated from her husband for years. She is not divorced, but she feels free enough to at least declare herself separate from Baxter. The contrast between Clara and Gertrude shows the extent to which the role of women has changed over the course of one generation. That Clara struggles to finalize her divorce, however, suggests that this change is not yet complete. Clara still feels the social pressure that enjoins her to Baxter, preventing her from formalizing their separation. She is more empowered than Gertrude, but she is still beholden to the social expectations and bureaucratic procedures that limit her rights.
The role of women is closely related to the role of class. Most of the women in Sons and Lovers come from working-class communities. Significantly, both Gertrude and Miriam would love to pursue a formal education. They resent how society limits their opportunities. As working-class women, they are denied schooling that is open to men, such as the night classes that William takes. They also have fewer opportunities to pursue education in their own time. Gertrude, for example, cannot indulge her interest in philosophy because she must devote so much time to her children. William’s girlfriend, Lily, is a middle-class woman. She has the resources and the time necessary to pursue an education, as she has opportunities that are not available to the working-class women in the novel. Despite the availability of these opportunities, she does not educate herself. William mocks her for not reading, subtly accusing her of squandering an opportunity that is not afforded to his beloved mother. The working-class women such as Gertrude and Miriam crave the opportunity to pursue an education, while the sole representative of middle-class women is barely aware of the privilege she enjoys.
Paul is portrayed as an empathetic and intelligent young man. In contrast to many of his peers, he demonstrates an awareness of his own emotions and a desire to help those around him. One of the reasons why Clara becomes so frustrated with him, however, is that he is seemingly unable to comprehend the role of women in society. From Paul’s perspective, his mother simply married the wrong man. He resents his father, rather than society itself, for causing his mother’s unhappiness. When Clara asks him about his views on the role of women, he offers up a defense of the status quo, revealing a set of traditional beliefs that clash with her idea of women’s independence. As with his mother, he blames the breakdown in Clara’s marriage on Baxter without attempting to comprehend how society dictates the role of women. As much as Paul’s intelligence and empathy distinguish him from most men, his inability to comprehend the issue of women’s right as a social problem demonstrates the way in which he remains fundamentally a product of his time.
By D. H. Lawrence