logo

27 pages 54 minutes read

Donald Barthelme

Some of Us Had Been Threatening Our Friend Colby

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1973

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

The Narrator

The unnamed narrator of “Some of Us Had Been Threatening Our Friend Colby” is a semi-static character. He is an integral part of the group and its decision-making process. The narrator’s voice is matter-of-fact, reflecting the group’s detachment from the moral implications of their decision to execute Colby by hanging. His calm tone when discussing the plan’s details and his focus on the practical aspects rather than the ethical ones underscore the story’s dark humor and absurdity.

The narrator’s primary role is to relate the story’s events to the reader. While he does not undergo a transformation in the narrative, his attitude and responses to the events offer a critique of Conformity and Groupthink and illustrate the process of Dehumanization and the Erosion of Individuality. His acceptance of the group’s decision and his involvement in the planning process demonstrate the dangers of a herd mentality and the ease with which violent acts can be rationalized and executed under the guise of protocol.

Colby

Colby, the target of the group’s unsettling plan, is a flat character characterized primarily by his impending predicament. His presence is felt throughout the narrative, but his voice and personal attributes remain largely undefined. Despite this, Colby plays a critical role in the narrative. His forthcoming execution serves as the catalyst for the group’s logistical discussions and planning.

While Colby does not undergo a transformation in the narrative due to the limited exposure to his character, his fate evokes a contemplation of his possible feelings and reactions. Despite half-hearted protests, such as a suggestion that his hanging may be “a little Draconian” (Paragraph 5), he largely goes along with the group consensus, demonstrating Conformity and Groupthink even in the face of death. The lack of focus on Colby’s perspective underscores the group’s dehumanization of him, aligning with the story’s critique of society’s capacity for dehumanizing individuals for perceived transgressions.

Victor

Victor, another group member, is a static character defined by his role in the execution planning. His concern that an unpainted gibbet might “look kind of ‘raw’” highlights the group’s fixation on the trivial aspects of the execution (Paragraph 3), contrasting starkly with the event’s gravity. Victor’s contribution to the narrative emphasizes The Absurdity and Banality of Violence theme, showing how individuals can focus on mundane details even when involved in horrifying acts.

Victor does not change or evolve throughout the story. Instead, he reinforces the norm of the group and its skewed priorities. His character illustrates how collective decision-making can lead to harmful outcomes, especially when the group is detached from the ethical implications of its decisions.

Howard

Howard stands as a secondary character who is characterized primarily through his dialogue. Of all the members of the group, he is the character least willing to accommodate Colby’s wishes. As a conductor, he quibbles over Colby’s choice of music, suggesting it is a “delaying tactic.” He also rules out the suggestion of a firing squad, asserting that “it would just be an ego trip for Colby” (5). Howard’s antipathy and impatience toward Colby suggests that he may be the leader of the group, instrumental in initiating the groupthink. Howard’s character does not undergo a significant transformation throughout the narrative; instead, he remains steadfast in his beliefs, contributing to the story’s dark, absurd humor.

Hank

Hank is another static character who remains silent as the group discusses cosmetic and aesthetic concerns such as invitations and the hiring of an orchestra. While Hank does not oppose the plan, he finally contributes to discussing the hanging’s logistics by suggesting they use wire instead of rope. Hank’s reasoning is that wire will kill Colby more quickly, reducing unnecessary suffering. Barthelme employs dark humor in the group’s outraged response to Hank’s suggestion as they condemn it as “distasteful.” The narrator’s complaint, “I thought it was really quite unpleasant of Hank to be sitting there talking about wire” (Paragraph 7), emphasizes how the group deliberately avoids confronting the brutality of their actions. Hank’s practical suggestion of wire conjures images of violent and bloody death, while the group would rather focus on the celebratory elements of the event.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text