35 pages • 1 hour read
Gary PaulsenA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Today, many people are familiar with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a condition of sustained mental distress caused by traumatic experiences. Military personnel are particularly prone to this disorder because of their combat experiences. Currently, PTSD is treatable through methods like cognitive behavioral therapy and medication. However, in Charley’s day, no formal diagnosis, understanding, or treatment options existed for soldiers suffering from what was then termed “Soldier’s Heart.” The existence of such a term implies that people recognized the mental anguish some men experienced after returning from war. Despite this, scientific and medical knowledge was limited; doctors did not have the awareness to diagnose the disorder much less help the men suffering from it.
Even though PTSD did not exist as a medical diagnosis, many soldiers suffered from it. Paulsen uses Charley’s character as an example of one man who entered battle at a tender age without much preparation either mentally or physically, and emerged with mental and emotional scars. Through the progression of battles in the novel, Paulsen shows how combat changed Charley’s character and personality. At first, Charley is friendly and open with the soldiers in his unit, but when many are lost in battles, he withdraws, finding it easier to be alone than to make friends that will inevitably die. He disconnects to protect himself from further trauma.
Paulsen also shows Charley’s transformation as a fighter. In Charley’s first battle at Bull Run, he is so overcome by shock and terror that he forgets to fire his musket. However, in subsequent battles, Charley shoots and uses his bayonet with zeal, becoming overtaken by rage toward enemy soldiers. Through this change, Paulsen demonstrates the kill or be killed mentality of battle. Charley’s fear leads to the need for self-preservation at all costs and causes him to change into a bloodthirsty fighter on the battlefield. Such changes in his character show that no soldier emerges from battle unscathed; combat’s effects reach to the core of one’s personality and character.
The novel’s final chapter offers a brief yet telling snapshot of the post-war Charley. Paulsen suggests that he is socially withdrawn, since he lives on the outskirts of town. He also suffers from suicidal thoughts and is haunted by sights and sounds of the battlefield that never fully leave him. These descriptions suggest that Charley suffers from PTSD. Even though he survived the war, his life is one of both physical and emotional pain that he cannot escape. Paulsen also suggests that Charley has little hope of recovery; he does not seem to have people in his life who understand the trauma of his past, and doctors, with their limited knowledge of mental health, can do nothing for him. Through Charley’s story, Paulsen shows that although PTSD was only formally recognized by the American Psychiatric Association in 1980, people have experienced it throughout history. He also emphasizes the horrific damage war inflicts; no one, even those who survive, emerges unscathed from a war.
Through Charley’s character and actions on the battlefield, Paulsen demonstrates the irony that to be brave, one must experience fear and continue to act despite it. He shows that Charley has chances to run from the fight, yet while everything inside him screams for desertion, Charley chooses to remain. Charley’s character is just one example of the many Civil War soldiers who chose to enter battles with their units despite excruciating fear. Paulsen shows that this form of bravery deserves recognition and teaches the reader that showing courage does necessitate fearlessness.
Charley’s experience at the Battle of Bull Run provides a telling example of the relationship between fear and bravery. Charley finds himself unprepared for the horrors of battle; he experiences terror in its rawest form as bullets fly and hit several of the men who surround him. He sees men wounded and groaning in pain, and bodies litter the ground. The Union army’s position on the battlefield makes it vulnerable to enemy fire, and Charley’s unit suffers heavy casualties. Paulsen’s use of vivid imagery and diction captures the battle scene for the reader alongside Charley’s thoughts and emotions.
Despite the terror that Charley feels, he makes a few choices that reveal his courage. One is that he fights the urge to run when his unit is ordered to retreat to the tree line. Charley understandably longs to run for cover, yet he follows his lieutenant’s command to retreat “in good order” (25), only breaking into a run when near to the trees. Charley’s choice to do the opposite of what his fear tells him to do shows courage.
Another example occurs the following morning. After the slaughter of the first day of battle, the men are ordered back across the meadow, towards the enemy. Charley can hardly believe that his feet carry him back onto the field and across it. As he nears the trees, he is convinced that a bullet will come for him any moment, and that every breath could be his last. Paulsen captures this intense terror using repetition and stream of consciousness style diction: “God oh God oh God now!” (38). Paulsen also shows that Charley’s dread is intense to the point of the physical response of wetting his pants. Charley’s extreme fear makes his actions in crossing the field all the more courageous. He follows his unit even though he feels convinced it means certain death.
Paulsen’s descriptions of Charley’s thoughts, emotions, and experiences provide readers a taste of the terror of battle. By showing the obedience and responses of Charley’s unit amidst the terror and distress of battle, Paulsen honors the experiences of the historical Charley Goddard, the unit The First Minnesota Volunteers, and any soldier who has chosen to remain in battle rather than run. He reminds the reader that true bravery is not a lack of fear, but the choice to act despite fear.
Charley’s young age means he has never before gone beyond his hometown, and he is under the impression that the war will not last long. He compares the excitement of the war with a circus, which demonstrates his somewhat childlike mentality. Yet Charley also wants to be a man and believes that enlisting will help make him one. Charley’s innocent mindset changes quickly; after seeing combat, he is convinced of his own impending death. While other men predict the end of the war out of hope, Charley is a realist. His naiveté is gone, replaced by a realistic, matter-of-fact despair.
Paulsen makes Charley’s character development clear by juxtaposing him with Nelson. Having never seen combat, Nelson is as confident and naive as Charley once was. Conversing with him and seeing his confidence, Charley can recognize that the violence, death, and gore of battle have irrevocably taken away his own youth. He is “old in the art of crossing meadows” (46). Combat ages Charley internally, and Charley knows that experience is the only way for Nelson to understand what the battlefield is like. Paulsen shows that war cannot be fully understood by an outside observer; experience is the only true teacher.
Chapter 10 also emphasizes the way Charley’s war experiences have stolen his innocence and youth. Charley is still young, only 21 years old. He hasn’t experienced many normal rites of passage such as a dating relationship or owning a piece of land. Despite Charley’s youth in years, Paulsen describes him as an old man. He limps, can’t sit on the ground properly, and is mentally tired and aged. He is already tired of living, and feels that death would be a welcome reprieve from the pain he lives with. Charley’s choice to have a picnic suggests innocence and happy times, yet Paulsen shows Charley’s picnic to be one of depression and despair. The war took away his innocence and youth, a robbery that is irreversible. While Paulsen’s narrative focuses on Charley’s individual experience, many soldiers from the Civil War could likely relate to Charley’s loss of innocence, and to the change that combat inflicted in their lives. Paulsen emphasizes the appalling nature of war and the damage it causes to those who experience it.
By Gary Paulsen