53 pages • 1 hour read
Theodore DreiserA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
On the train to Chicago, young Carrie, who faces the daunting challenge of finding work in the big city, falls under the tonic spell of the salesman Charles Drouet—not because of the quality of his character but because he is wearing a flashy suit.
In Sister Carrie, Money means power. Chicago is a “giant magnet” for the “hopeful and the hopeless” (12) who aspire to the privilege and power of money. Characters dream of the lavish opulence it can secure. Hurstwood is victimized by careless greed and left without money. He lives a miserable life on the streets, begging for enough change to get him to the next day. Making matters worse, the novel is set amid the economic catastrophe of the Panic of 1893, second only in impact to the stock market collapse that ushered in the Great Depression 40 years later.
Although Dreiser, the novel’s moral authority, disagrees, within the novel money symbolizes power. For an America just waking up to its new identity as an international economic force, the idea of money compels the novel. Characters live in fear of losing it. Hurstwood, for all his passion for Carrie, measures his every action against the possibility of his wife pursuing legal action that would make him a pauper. His downfall is not so much the tragedy of a married man finding at last the love of his life, but rather the reality that every business to which he attaches himself collapses in either fraud or bankruptcy. Lavish opulence—not moral authority, sound judgment, or even intellectual thought—equates to power.
From the moment she sees the shabby conditions in which her sister lives, Carrie commits herself to acquisition. In elegant furniture, fashion, and fancy housing in the right neighborhood, Carrie sees keys to security. Until she makes her mark on the stage, Carrie is aware of how the ladies of wealth who stroll down Broadway look down on her. She lacks the dress and the hairstyles of the empowered wealthy. Although Dreiser undercuts Carrie’s fascination (and later obsession) with wealth, only the late conversations with Bob Ames give Carrie insight into the possibility that perhaps money is not the end-all. In the novel’s closing tableau, a wealthy Carrie, now remade entirely into an actor named Carrie Madenda, rocks back and forth, suggesting motion but no progress, and struggles to understand why her money has left her so empty. The novel makes clear the danger of embracing money as power.
Sister Carrie is a künstlerroman, a genre of literature that tracks the evolution of an artist. The novel is informed by the theater. As a journalist working in Chicago and then New York, Dreiser understood the power and reach of the theater. Carrie finds her financial security by becoming a comic actor. Later, her conversation with Bob Ames about the purpose of the theater nearly becomes the tipping point in Carrie’s eventual epiphany into the shallowness of her success.
In keeping with Dreiser’s perception of the theater as a potentially powerful tool for social instruction, the author employs the theater and Carrie’s discovery of the world of make-believe as a teaching tool. Carrie Meeber becomes Carrie Madenda. Many of her experiences in both Chicago and New York center on her working her way into a career as a headliner in Broadway comedies. Along the way, several theater works from the era symbolically resonate with Carrie’s evolution, including: Gilbert and Sullivan’s comic opera The Mikado, with its hyperromantic tale of a young suitor willing to die to spend a single month with the woman he loves; King Lear, with its dramatic tale of a dysfunctional royal family and a father who is never content with the love of his daughters; Rip van Winkle, the American folk tale about a lazy husband who creates an outlandish story of meeting ghosts in the Catskills to cover 20 years of freedom from his shrewish wife; and the staggeringly popular melodrama Under the Gaslight, with its story of an imperiled woman, left by her lover, who faces a villainous stalker.
In each storyline, the plays expose significant social and economic problems, including: the lack of communication in a relationship, the distracting pull of the flesh, the impact of emotional bullying and the harm done by the threat of violence, the helplessness of women preyed on by men, and the dangerous endgame of isolation. But the plays fail to offer practical teachable moments that would allow art to be a vehicle for genuine change. Instead, theater becomes a refuge from such realities.
From the moment she first attends a theater performance, Carrie cannot—or perhaps will not—separate the illusions of the stage from the real-life world. Her success on stage is a way for her to distance herself from her identity. She plays emotions on the stage she never expresses with either Drouet or Hurstwood. She is enthralled by the fancy costumes, the stage sets, and the pretend elegance of props. Dreiser damns Carrie the only way he can: He makes her a gifted actor, a natural on the stage. As a creature of artifice, at home only within the spectacle faux-reality of the stage, Carrie is seduced by the escape implicit in the protective insulation of a theater. She delays engaging the world as it is—when Carrie is ushered out of the theater after one of her stunning performances, she is only vaguely aware of the lines of unhoused vagrants hoping for some handouts. And caught up in glitter and artifice, Carrie Madenda never needs to confront whatever happened to Caroline Meeber.
Like some Medieval allegorist, Dreiser uses the city as a moral construct. To him, it is a nested world of carnal temptations, moral and spiritual emptiness, emotional isolation, and economic inequities. The plot of the novel is deceptively simple: A girl goes to the city to find success. The novel never shares much about Carrie Meeber’s youth growing up in rural Wisconsin nor much about the decision she makes to move in with her sister in a city she has never visited. In turn, her life’s emotional and psychological journey is shaped by cities—first Chicago, then Montreal, and finally New York.
For Dreiser’s generation, the city was still a relatively new concept. As America only gradually eased away from its cultural identity as an agrarian nation, the construct of the city began to define America’s economic clout and its future as a global player. Born in rural Indiana, Dreiser found the complexity of the city—its sheer size, noise, pollution, and chaos—a freighted, hellish landscape that challenged the moral integrity of even the most moral who came within reach of its Boschian environment.
Carrie is not immediately enthralled by the city. Her initial job search dispels any notion that the city is a paradigm of virtue, civility, hospitality, and opportunity. The managers who interviews her are rude. The crowds on the sidewalks convince her of her insignificance. What little attention she receives comes from misogynistic men commodifying her as a sexual object. For Dreiser, the city emerges as the antagonist in the story of Carrie’s rise to success. Withstanding the city’s temptations, maintaining the integrity of her small-town morality, and trusting in the viability and value of herself would guarantee Carrie’s spiritual victory.
That she does none of these is her downfall. She falls so completely under the spell of Fifth Avenue, Plaza Square, and Broadway that she is left in the closing chapters empty, aching, and lost. That she falls under the spell of the city—with its ostentatious homes, flashy restaurants with marble-lined sinks, and shallow residents are dressed in costumed finery—speaks to her surrender to the malignant power of the city. This marks Sister Carrie as a cautionary tale told to a culture just beginning to define the implications of the cities springing up around it.
The rocking-chair in the New York apartment Carrie and Hurstwood share symbolizes the need to understand a world that is menacingly complex and threatening. It is a need the narrator ultimately renders as ironic and pointless.
For Hurstwood, the rocking-chair is his go-to place to read the city newspaper. Even as one by one his job ventures and investments collapse into ruin, he seeks the newspapers to help create some sense out of the disaster that is becoming his life. The newspaper takes the chaos and confusion of the city and measures it out into tidy columns. Dreiser, a career journalist, understood the relationship between what happens on the street and what is offered in the newspaper. By imposing causality and implying explanation and coherence to events, the newspaper provides Hurstwood some reassuring clarity, even as he begins to sink into the depression that will drive him to suicide.
Carrie also seeks the rocking-chair to help calm the chaos of her life—specifically, her rising status in the theater and the growing problems with Hurstwood. As she sits in the rocker, she watches the streets below her window. From that vantage point, the chaos of the city suggests order and logic, as the lines of pedestrians and vehicles create a reassuring kind of pattern. It calms her to be above the fray. She can look down and see only order and direction, lending some purpose to the city’s manic energy. As with Hurstwood and his newspaper, Carrie in the rocker by the window finds a kind of serenity.
But Dreiser cannot allow the rocking-chair to emerge as anything but a dangerous illusion. The more Hurstwood rocks and reads the newspaper, the more disconnected he is, and the less he comes to address his financial woes. The steady rocking becomes narcotic. And the more Carrie rocks by the window, the less in touch she becomes with her own heart and self. The novel closes with Carrie sitting alone in that rocking-chair by the window, struggling to understand the implications of a life so entirely devoid of emotional reward. The narrator dismisses Carrie and leaves her to her struggle to make sense of her life. The novel closes on exactly that harsh admonition: “In your rocking-chair, by your window, shall you dream such happiness as you will never know” (344).
By Theodore Dreiser