logo

65 pages 2 hours read

Mahbod Seraji

Rooftops of Tehran

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2009

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Political Activism and Defiance In the Face of Oppression

Content Warning: The source text features depictions of political oppression and physical violence, including scenes of torture, mentions of sexual assault, and self-immolation.

Political activism and defiance in the face of oppression is one of the central themes in Rooftops of Tehran. It affects and transforms the lives of the major characters. Pasha, Doctor, Ahmed, Zari, Faheemeh, and Iraj all engage in acts of defiance against oppression, regardless of whether the oppression is local or national and political. Defiance becomes a tool for fighting oppression, holding onto moral identity, and dealing with grief.

The novel presents defiance and political activism as a tool to fight the oppression imposed on Iranian citizens by the Shah’s regime and the state. One striking example of a public and national form of defiance is Golesorkhi’s trial. He chooses a national, public platform to speak out against the Shah—namely, on a live, televised trial. Pasha describes Golesorkhi yelling, “This court is an illegal institution,” with “his fist crashing down on the podium with such force that the [audience] jump in [their] seats” (31). Golesorkhi goes on to say “The Shah is a tyrant, a servant of the Americans, and a puppet of the West” (31). The effectiveness of the threat posed by Golesorkhi’s defiance is reflected by the blackout following his words against the Shah; the trial is cut off and instead, an American soap called Peyton Place is shown in its stead, further affirming Golesorkhi’s accusation of the Shah being a puppet of the West.

Similarly, Zari chooses a public form of defiance against the Shah when she chooses to self-immolate on the day of the Shah’s birthday. She does this during his motorcade, which is an event that is watched by hundreds of people on the streets and is televised. Therefore, her act of defiance becomes a public, national spectacle that cannot be ignored by the masses or by the autocratic authorities. Both Golesorkhi and Zari’s actions further inspire and instigate political activism and defiance. Pasha, Iraj, and Ahmed are inspired by their actions and each other’s defiance in fighting against the oppressive regime in whatever way they can.

The novel also portrays defiance as a means of coping with grief. Pasha’s planting of the rosebush—which was forbidden by the SAVAK—is his way of honoring and mourning Doctor. Therefore, the planting of the rosebush allows Pasha to transform his grief into an act of political defiance and activism through which Pasha undermines the authority and control of the SAVAK. Similarly, when Ahmed makes the boys in the neighborhood laugh in his mock lesson on masturbation, he undermines the power and control of the state over their lives. By laughing and releasing the tension, anger, and grief that Doctor’s arrest caused, the young men of the neighborhood are able to take back control of their lives for a while.

Lastly, the novel portrays political activism and defiance as ways in which characters can stay true to their moral cores. This can be seen through Doctor, Ahmed, and Iraj’s actions. Despite the personal danger posed to him, Doctor gets involved in political activism, even though he has his whole life ahead of him. More importantly, when he is going to be arrested, Doctor, like Golesorkhi, maintains his sense of dignity and selfhood. Pasha says, “His head is up, his shoulders square; he will not allow anyone to take away his dignity” (83). Similarly, in the face of Mr. Gorji’s tyrannical rule at school, Ahmed continues to defy his authority in whatever way he can. Iraj, realizing he must pay his respects to Doctor and stand with Ahmed and Pasha, goes to Doctor’s funeral, despite warning Pasha and Ahmed not to go because of the danger. Therefore, defiance and political activism, often intertwined in the context of the novel, become tools of fighting oppression, of holding onto morality in an oppressive and manipulative environment, and coming to terms with grief.

The Importance of Friendship and Community

The bonds of friendship between different characters is a central theme in the novel. While much of the novel revolves around Pasha and Ahmed’s friendship, there are multiple other notable friendships that provide hope and encouragement to characters living through trying times. This theme highlights the importance of having a support system of trusted people in times of political oppression and upheaval. Throughout, Pasha and Ahmed protect each other to the best of their abilities; Ahmed saves Pasha from getting expelled, while Pasha encourages Ahmed to pursue Faheemeh and confess his feelings. Pasha’s friendship with Doctor encourages him to keep finding new ways to honor Doctor and to pass Doctor’s story along so that others can understand and be inspired by his bravery and idealism. Like Ahmed and Pasha, Pasha’s father’s friendship with Mr. Mehrbaan is also a source of comfort and strength. Mr. Mehrbaan saved Pasha’s father from getting caught and shot when they were drafted into the army; Pasha’s father continues to support and look after Mrs. Mehrbaan after Mr. Mehrbaan’s arrest, and he looks after Mr. Mehrbaan after his release from prison.

Similarly, women have supportive friendships in the novel. Mrs. Mehrbaan and Pasha’s mother are close friends, keeping each other company and supporting one another through the various upheavals of their lives. Faheemeh and Zari confide in one another and are always supportive of each other. Faheemeh is the first person Zari asked to accompany her to Doctor’s funeral, and despite the danger to herself, Faheemeh agrees, further passing along Zari’s messages to Ahmed and Pasha.

The novel also highlights the importance of community. For Pasha, his alley is one of the important communities that supports him. He also has his extended family and friends, including his parents’ friends, who care deeply about him. Indeed, after Pasha’s return from the hospital, his community welcomes him back home. Similarly, at the end of the novel, Pasha’s extended community helps him with his move to the US. Relatives of Mr. Mehrbaan, whom Pasha has never met, are supposed to pick him up from the airport in Los Angeles, while exiled comrades of Mr. Mehrbaan help Pasha obtain a fake I-20 form that will help him enter the US. This community helps save his life.

The novel shows that a community is especially essential in times of grief. Pasha explains Iranian customs of mourning, highlighting the aspect of togetherness: “We get together on the third, the seventh, and the fortieth day after someone has died. Tea, sherbet, and sweets are served. Friends, acquaintances, and family members show up with flowers to offer their condolences” (143). Toward the end of the novel, when the entire neighborhood comes together near Doctor’s grave to put single red roses on it, the role of the community comes into play. Similarly, when Pasha is at the hospital, the neighborhood comes together to take care of the rosebush in honor of Doctor, Pasha, and Zari, and all the sacrifices they have made. The novel shows that together, a community can display strength and unity in face of oppression.

The Effects of Western Imperialism In Iran

The effects of Western hegemony and intervention in Iran alongside US imperialism is a key theme within the novel. Many characters repeatedly refer to the Shah as a puppet of the West, which is a derogatory comment meant to highlight his collusion with Western powers, especially Britain and the US. This remark is also deeply connected to the historical and economic roots of Iran, since the Shah came into power because of Western interference and was therefore invested in pandering to his Western allies. Therefore, the novel shows that Western hegemony and US imperialism threaten Iranian culture, independence, and economic freedom.

A key instance of Western imperialism occurs during Golesorkhi’s trial. As soon as Golesorkhi accuses the Shah of being a “puppet of the West” (31), the broadcast is cut short, and an American soap opera, Peyton Place, is played on screen instead. This emphasizes how American media and culture is passed on and promoted in Tehran. Furthermore, American culture and media are offered to the public as a distraction from the brutal reality of living under an autocratic ruler. Indeed, after listening to Mr. and Mrs. Mehrbaan’s harrowing tale of separation and imprisonment, when Pasha turns on his TV, he watches several American shows. He says: “I turn on the TV and watch Bewitched. Is life in America really the way it’s portrayed on these television shows?” (111). The detail that the show is Bewitched is significant since American media seems to be bewitching the Iranian public into forgetting their harsh reality by distracting them with TV shows. Pasha continues, “I look at Mrs. Mehrbaan […] and wonder why Americans don’t make movies about Middle Eastern women like her” (112). Through this statement, the novel highlights the vast disconnect between Pasha’s reality and the reality of those around him, and the media and content available to them. Therefore, American media becomes a source of distancing Iranian people from Iranian ideals and reality.

Alongside cultural repercussions of Western hegemony, there are also political repercussions. Iraj talks about how the American CIA overthrew Mosaddegh, who was the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran. Due to his nationalist policies, which gave the power of Iranian oil and its subsequent economic boom back to Iran, as well as Mosaddegh’s communist leanings, Britain and America were against him. In 1953, the CIA orchestrated his downfall, which led to him being under house arrest until his death in 1967. Therefore, economically, Western imperialism keeps its own interest at heart when operating in Iran; rather than advancing Iranian society and developing the villages, the money goes to those who are corrupt and already rich. Pasha declares, “No one in the Middle East will ever again trust the Americans and their phony guardianship of democracy” (96); as a result of this political meddling, relations between Iran and the West grew worse. The novel shows that Western imperialism works to strip away Iranian culture and identity while funneling away its wealth.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text