logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Matthew Desmond

Poverty, by America

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Prologue-Chapter 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Prologue Summary

Desmond begins with the central question of why there is so much poverty in America. It has been the focus of his academic career, and the subject has deep personal resonance for him as well. He grew up in a modest home near Winslow, Arizona, that his family lost to the bank. He attended Arizona State University and met people his age with great privilege while the city of Tempe, where the campus is located, had severe poverty.

As an undergraduate at Arizona State University and then as a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin, Desmond began talking to the poor and documenting their struggles. He has long sought to understand how a country as rich as the United States could also have higher levels of poverty than other developed nations. Despite its massive gross domestic product (GDP), there are US citizens lacking running water and suffering from treatable diseases.

The existing literature has tended to focus on the facts of poverty that, while important, are not sufficient in themselves to explain why the US still has so much poverty. Reexamining this issue from a structural perspective can help shed light on the policies needed to ameliorate and even solve the problem.

Chapter 1 Summary: “The Kind of Problem Poverty Is”

The first chapter begins in a Newark courthouse, where a man ceded control of his two older children in order to retain custody of the third and youngest. Desmond sees this as emblematic of the brutal choices people have to make while living in poverty. Being poor technically means being unable to afford basic necessities. People thus fall under the poverty line if their income is not sufficient to cover the total cost of food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, and other core human needs.

The idea of the poverty line risks turning people into statistics, and so to put a human face on poverty, Desmond turns to Crystal Mayberry, who was born into an abusive household and placed in foster care at a young age. Shuffling among various homes, she began to exhibit symptoms of mental illness and became eligible for a small supplementary income. Upon finding an apartment, the cost of rent squeezed out other necessities, and after being evicted due to inability to pay, she was disqualified from housing assistance. Her mental illness also contributed to violent behaviors that made it even harder for her to secure a residence. She then lost her government income, after which she became homeless and had no options for money other than sex work.

For Desmond, this story illustrates a few core facts about poverty. The first is that poverty entails acute physical pain, with causes including long hours of menial labor, unsafe working conditions, a lack of medical care, and brushes with violence. Poverty is trauma, often leading to substance abuse and psychological disorders. Poverty is instability, where secure housing and employment are rare. Poverty is fear of loss, including for those who hover above the formal poverty line but may dip below it at any moment or for those already below it but who may sink even further into extreme poverty.

Millions of Americans have a standard of living that most think exists only in the most desperate regions of the developing world. Poverty is unfreedom, given the likelihood of a poor person becoming incarcerated and the law often criminalizing poverty and homelessness so that they become second-class citizens. Poverty is embarrassment, the humiliation of prostrating before officials for meager handouts and feeling invisible in a society that barely even recognizes that a problem exists. Poverty diminishes life itself, inflicting levels of stress and disorientation commensurate with sleeplessness or alcohol abuse.

However, poverty is not just one thing for everyone, as race can make it slightly better or worse for different groups. Black and Hispanic families are more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher concentrations of poverty, with worse-performing schools and higher levels of crime. In short, poverty is a systemic problem connected to every other social ill, and it poses a severe threat to the health and dignity of millions of citizens within the world’s most powerful and prosperous country.

Chapter 2 Summary: “Why Haven’t We Made More Progress?”

Chapter 2 compares extraordinary developments in medicine and technology with poverty statistics that have barely moved in half a century. Overall living standards have risen, and more technologies are available for more people, but that has not translated into greater percentages of people being able to afford basic needs.

One common explanation is the advent of “neoliberalism,” a bipartisan commitment to slashing the welfare state in order to empower the free market. However, welfare spending has increased in the period associated with neoliberalism, mostly due to rising healthcare costs but other programs as well. Part of the solution that Desmond identifies is that federal antipoverty programs give states wide discretion in how they spend the money, and many of their expenses have had little to do with poverty. They may also decide not to spend it at all, and because states frequently reject disability claims, a large percentage of such awards go to the lawyers who were necessary to secure payment in the first place.

It is common to blame immigrants for welfare costs rising even as the availability of benefits remains stagnant, both now and throughout American history. In reality, poverty rates have not gone up even as immigration has increased, and in some of the states with the highest number of immigrants, rates of poverty went down. This is partially because immigrants exhibit higher degrees of economic mobility, and their main competition for jobs is with one another, not with native-born workers. When there are not enough undocumented migrants to fill other kinds of jobs, the jobs tend to go to machines rather than native-born workers. Immigrants on average rely less on welfare programs, which they either do not qualify for or fear to seek out lest it put them in danger.

Another possible culprit is the increase in single-parent households, which are more prone to poverty than two-parent households. However, this same correlation does not hold outside the United States, especially in countries that make substantial investments in daycare and paid family leave. Marriage, as well as homeownership, is more available to those who have already achieved a degree of financial security, rather than a means of moving from the lower class to the middle class. Incarceration, which disproportionately affects the poor, also contributes to the breakup of families and compounds their financial struggles. Welfare programs punish two-parent households or even living with relatives.

Some argue that graduating from high school, getting a job, and waiting for marriage to have children is a formula for success, but Black families who follow those steps have less success than white ones, and trying to resolve poverty is a better way to deal with the problem than funneling the poor into marriage. Ultimately, the root of poverty is systems in place that knowingly perpetuate it.

Prologue-Chapter 2 Analysis

In order to proceed with a comprehensive examination of poverty in America, Desmond must clarify a complex relationship with statistics. Numerical data about poverty simultaneously provides unmistakable evidence of America’s poverty problem while obstructing efforts to solve it. As Desmond describes, based on his own experiences and those he has known, poverty is a psychological phenomenon that one can experience in countless forms, not just an economic state. It is the shame of struggling to get by while one’s friends have access to luxuries, the stress of waiting for the next bill or knock on the door from the police, and the agitation and suppressed rage that may explode into violence.

There is no way to quantify these feelings, in part because they manifest in different ways for each individual, and a single person can contribute to a multitude of statistics regarding crime, mental health, reliance on social services, unemployment, and other variables. All such statistics are bound to lose sight of the sheer agony of poverty, turning those unique experiences into an aggregation of data points under a single heading. Nowhere is this tendency more dangerous than with respect to “the poverty line,” the main metric used in the United States. A single number cannot possibly provide a reliable determination of who is poor and who is not. Someone’s health situation, a job requiring a more expensive commute, the need to pay for schooling, and countless other factors can make the same amount of money less viable for the same number of people.

In the US, as Desmond describes, the poverty line hurts the poor at least as much as it helps them, partly due to The Myths of Scarcity in American Society that make it difficult for the poor to access meaningful assistance. Since it is the primary standard for determining eligibility for all manner of federal and state aid programs, earning an income just barely above the line renders citizens ineligible for many such programs. It imagines a clear and absolute line dividing the poor from the not poor, with the former deserving of just enough aid to push them over the line, after which they can be assumed financially independent. This ignores the myriad difficulties that one faces in escaping poverty that, as Desmond points out, are related to the problem of not just lacking money but also overcoming the stigma associated with having been poor, which is so formidable that it drags down those who might otherwise be capable of making enough money. Statistical categories erase the complex social realities of poverty and reduce it to purely quantitative terms.

For all the limits of statistical analysis, it is still necessary for addressing and solving the problem. Numbers are inherently imprecise, but they prove the sheer magnitude of the problem of poverty in the United States, especially compared to other countries with democratic institutions and comparable levels of development. The data turn the tables on the claim of “American exceptionalism”—the notion that the US is uniquely successful or virtuous among all the nations of the world—to show how it in fact has unique social problems. While America has a massive GDP and is one of the most successful countries in the world, it has created a two-tier system of Private Opulence and Public Squalor, in which the country boasts both substantial wealth and crippling rates of poverty simultaneously. Desmond regards poverty as both a social phenomenon as well as an economic one, arguing that poverty is often rendered invisible or downplayed to hide structural injustices—an idea he will explore more thoroughly later in the work.

Statistics are also useful in refuting some of the most common misperceptions regarding the causes of poverty. The Myths of Scarcity in American Society are also linked to myths surrounding the purported origins of this scarcity. Those on the political left look to the 1980s and 1990s as a time when governments in both the United Kingdom and the US sought to deconstruct the state and deprive it of its ability to serve its poor citizens. Desmond will find some contributors to poverty as originating in this time period, but the data point to the system of distributing aid and criteria for eligibility as proving far more troublesome than a lack of resources due to budget cuts. On the right, immigrants have long been scapegoats for economic problems, but this is rooted in the stereotype of a person coming to the US with no money or skills and therefore acting as a drain on the system, when in fact immigrants have proven their ability to contribute more than they cost. Immigrants and native-born workers face many struggles, but there is nothing to suggest that they are locked in competition with one another.

Single-parent households are a consequence rather than a cause of poverty, and even if one disapproves of someone’s moral choices, it makes little economic sense to punish them with a lifetime of poverty, and no moral explanation can account for racial disparities in poverty. In identifying the core problems of poverty and identifying a solution, good data are indispensable, but they cannot obscure the fundamental human reality that makes poverty so harmful.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text