25 pages • 50 minutes read
John KeatsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The emotion of longing permeates the poem, with the speaker often wishing for anything that will take him out of his present state. In his present state, the speaker has an exaggerated awareness of the constraints and shackles of human life. That is why his description of human existence is hyperbolic, as is his idea of an escape. To be human is described as sitting and hearing each other groan, and to think is to “be full of sorrow / leaden-eyed despairs” (Lines 27-28). Note the heaviness of the word “leaden,” as if the speaker feels physically weighed down by his troubles. Not even beauty and love provide a respite in this state: “Beauty cannot keep her lustrous eyes, / Or new Love pine at them beyond to-morrow” (Lines 29-30). Thus, the speaker experiences human life as overwhelmingly negative, although the truth is this existence also encompasses imagination and beauty. The emphasis on the drudgery and misery of life reveals the speaker’s altered state of mind: He is worried, bereaved, and emotionally exhausted.
It is not just the descriptions of decay that emphasize the bleakness of human life but also the powerful longing for the alternate. To the speaker in his sorrowed state, any potential respite appears a miracle and a reprieve. It is not enough to admire the nightingale for its beautiful song. The mortal nightingale has to be turned into a symbol of immortality and escape. The speaker’s flight with the nightingale is as much a flight away from human cares and responsibilities as it is into magic and beauty. From this flight, the speaker dreads the return to the “sole self,” his own mind and existence eaten away by fret and grief. The references to human faculties and people are often pessimistic and bleak, the brain or rational mind is described as “dull,” as something that “perplexes and retards” (Line 34), and Ruth—whose story in the Bible has a happy conclusion—is depicted as a sad, isolated figure among the “alien corn” (Line 67).
The poem can be read as a mediation on life and death. Like any such thoughtful meditation, the poem cannot provide definitive answers to the conundrum of human life. Rather, it travels through the contradictions of human thought and existence and doesn’t attempt to resolve their inherent tension. In this context, concepts like death and immortality appear in contradictory and illogical forms in the poem. The speaker simultaneously longs for death, crooning to it as if to a lover, but he also laments mortal existence, whose fate is decay and to be trod down by hungry generations. Similarly, a mortal bird becomes a symbol of immortality, and its song becomes timeless through millennia. These contradictory depictions mirror the contradictions of human life: death is both relief and monster, immortality is both desired and feared.
For the speaker, immortality signifies transcendence from the constraints of reality, time, and even self. He wants to forget the grief that weighs his self and sink “Lethe-wards” (Line 4), lose himself in wine, fly away with the nightingale into a magical reality, and be transported by poetry. He attempts this transcendence through imagining vividly the vehicle of his flight: The wine is observed in gorgeous, sensorial detail, as is the dark flower-filled forest. The forest here is a symbol of the unknown, a place where the poet can leave his human life behind and experience oneness with nature. Tellingly, here he abandons sight, experiencing the forest and its delights with his olfactory and auditory senses. In his transcendent state, the speaker is no longer bound by sight or feet, he can experience nature any way he wishes and even fly to the moon.
Thus, the concepts of escape, transcendence, and immortality are used interchangeably in the poem. Further, the poet even blurs the boundary between immortality and non-existence: The speaker wishes not merely to be immortal but to “fade far away, dissolve, and quite forget” (Line 21). He wants the kind of immortality that art offers, where there remains no distinction between art and artist, much like the nightingale and its song have become one for him. Of course, the poet knows this is an impossible state; he cannot be alive in death. When he is dead, the nightingale’s song will fall on the ears of a “sod” (Line 60) or a piece of earth. That is why the poem keeps returning to the poet’s reality.
“Ode to a Nightingale” is an interesting poem in the Romantic tradition, since it acknowledges the limits of the imagination even while illustrating its potency. The poem helps the reader see that different Romantic poets conceptualized the imagination differently; and sometimes the concept of imagination changes even through the works of the same poet. In his letters and other works, Keats often writes about the creative power of the imagination, such as this November 22, 1817 missive to his friend Benjamin Bailey: “The imagination may be compared to Adam’s dream—he awoke and found it truth.” “Ode to a Nightingale” accepts this creative potency: The speaker uses the imagination to travel away from himself, transport into literally and figuratively sunnier climes, and experience a fairy-realm of magic. The imagination—aided by wine, poetry, and above all, the inspiration of the nightingale’s song—does manage to give the speaker a respite from his reality.
For Keats, this respite isn’t merely a distraction, it is a necessary condition of living. If it were not for the respite and transcendence offered by the imagination, life would be unbearable. It is through the imagination that the speaker conjures for himself a vivid world filled with blushing wine, and “the coming musk-rose, full of dewy wine, / The murmurous haunt of flies on summer eves” (Lines 49-50). Through passing the constraints of dry logic, the speaker can connect with the natural world, be one with the nightingale, and envision a landscape where spring (fading violets, the “coming” or nascent musk rose) coexists with high summer (the “sunburnt mirth” [Line 14] of Provencal, the blooming rose as a haunt for busy flies). The poet highlights the transportive power of the imagination through the metaphors of flight, travel, and fantasy realms. The nightingale’s song—symbolizing the imagination— “Charm'd magic casements, opening on the foam / Of perilous seas, in faery lands forlorn” (Lines 69-70). The image is of a rescuing magical portal opened on a storm-tossed sea deck; of course, the real idea here is that the song of a passing nightingale can help even beleaguered seafarers imagine a fairy realm in summer.
Yet, the fairy realm is “forlorn” (Line 70). It is no magical antidote to the “perilous seas” (Line 70). The word forlorn itself is solid and real and brings the speaker back to reality. The imagination has managed to transport him briefly, but the spell is now broken. The sound and semantics of the word “forlorn” grow louder, tolling like a bell, and pushing the speaker towards the hard facts that the nightingale is a passing bird, and he is a land-bound human. He cannot fly away with it or get rid of his humanity. Now, the imagination, which offered him an escape from his temporal reality, turns into a trickster, a deceiver. The speaker even begins to second-guess his experiences with the nightingale, wondering if he actually heard its song, or “[whether] it a waking dream” (Line 79). While it may seem the speaker admits that imagined worlds are unreal, the poem’s central concern is quite different. The poem does not really downplay the imagination, rather it asserts that the imagination coexists with reality. Therefore, there is always a tussle between worlds imagined and real. This is why the speaker repeatedly flies and gets grounded. Finally, the ending question: “do I wake or sleep” (Line 80) has the speaker questioning the blurring boundary between waking and sleeping states. Both are equally real.
By John Keats