logo

62 pages 2 hours read

Jean-Paul Sartre

No Exit

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1944

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Themes

Subjectivity Versus Objectivity of the Self

Sartre and the existentialists claim that people are their actions. We create meaning from our behavior, but so do others observing us.

Garcin, Inez, and Estelle spend most of their time looking at one another. Their inability to sleep or blink in the afterlife, as well as the play’s one act structure, emphasize looking without pause or rest. The characters must regard one another constantly. Garcin hides his eyes behind his hands, but even if he and the others aren’t looking literally, they can’t escape awareness of one another. After the three characters take a vow of silence and vow not to look at one another, Inez exclaims: “To forget about the others? How utterly absurd! I feel you there, in every pore. Your silence clamors in my ears” (23). Sartre uses Inez to clarify that the Look is not just literally looking, but being aware of the presence of others, who are aware of you. The Look is a reflexive cycle: When Garcin is looking at and aware of Inez, Inez is looking at and aware of Garcin.

Subjectivity is the philosophical quality of having internal thoughts, feelings, and self-reflection. If something is subjective, a being creates and interprets it. Whether or not one likes a piece of art is a subjective experience, as well as how one thinks of one’s own actions. Objectivity is the philosophical quality of existing out in the world, outside of a subjective consciousness. A red ball is an objective thing that exists in reality: We can all look at it and understand that it is a red ball, though we might have different thoughts and feelings associated with red balls.

Sartre noticed an interesting quality that comes from viewing the world as a split between the subjective and the objective: If we look at other people (other subjectivities), they become objects in our view when we contemplate them. This means that no subjective experience is wholly subjective and self-determined since it is always open to being scrutinized by others.

Garcin believes himself to be a hero and experiences this subjectively. He wanted to escape the war draft and write an influential pacifist newspaper that would determine the war’s course. Whenever his attention is pulled back to Earth, his former coworkers are discussing his cowardice. From the afterlife, he is aware that they’re looking at him and discussing him as an object that exists in the world. The supernatural awareness of being looked at and treated as an object represents the shock Sartre believes the subjective being experiences when treated as an object.

Garcin begs Estelle to look at him and proclaim he is not a coward. Inez proclaims him a coward and Estelle also admits he may be a coward. When viewed through Sartre’s concept of the Look, No Exit becomes a series of scenes in which two characters look at the third and judge them as an object existing in relation to their own subjectivities. The character being judged often cannot cope with the look of the other two, even if it offers them insight into who they are.

Estelle cannot handle the conflict between her objective and subjective selves. Her inability to cope with the split makes her desire Garcin’s sexual/romantic attraction above anything else. Estelle believes a man’s attention would allow her to reassert the internal, subjective self that she wishes to be on the outside. She views herself as a high society woman, one capable of attracting men as she pleases. She is a “little sparrow” that has fallen out of men’s hearts once Peter forgets about her; being in men’s hearts is central to her self-image, and she needs others to fulfill this part of her subjective sense of self (34). Garcin cannot or will not play this role, and suggests she seek comfort from Inez. Estelle, who wants to realize her internal sense of self, can’t cope with Garcin’s rejection.

Through Inez, Sartre further explores the subjective versus the objective self. Inez’s monologues often bear a resemblance to Sartre’s work in “Existentialism Is a Humanism” and Being and Nothingness. She is the one character who provides little excuse for her actions. She has molded her internal sense of self to external perceptions, which has removed the anxiety that the other two carry. She calls them all “criminals” and proclaims herself to be cruel and sadistic. She is at ease with how others view her. She is also the first to admit that she intrinsically needs others when she says, “when I’m alone I flicker out” (27). However, she is not immune to being tormented by the other two. In the final third of the play, Estelle makes sexual advances toward Garcin for the sole sake of hurting Inez, whom she fears. Garcin joins in for the same reason. Inez, a lesbian with a stated interest in Estelle, is still hurt despite claiming to be cruel and heartless.

In No Exit, Sartre examines our constant need for others. The subjective self can’t resolve or have conviction without reinforcement through the objective self that others create. Garcin calls for each of them to stay silent so that they can seek their “salvation” (18). He represents the rationalist for whom thought is self-sufficient and the only means to finding peace. Sartre represents the demand for thought above all else as isolating and unobtainable. Estelle and Inez always break his silence. Garcin’s rationalism does not allow him to determine whether he is a hero or a coward. He needs others to reflect his actions and life events back to him.

When the door opens in the final few pages, he stays because he needs the other two to make sense of himself. His plan of self-reflection fails. Estelle stays because she needs Garcin to reinforce her own image as a desirable and conventionally successful woman. She is “fearfully fascinated” by what she sees in Inez when Inez gazes at her, implying that Estelle fears her own attraction to Inez. Inez also needs the two of them, despite their efforts to torment her. Missing her former lover Florence, she feels drawn to Estelle. She and Garcin feel that the two of them have much in common, implying that Inez stays due to a sense of camaraderie with Garcin. Each character needs the other two to fully understand their self.

For Sartre, the conflict between the subjective and objective self is a source of great anxiety. Each character looks at the others and creates objective versions of them. At the same time, they know that the other is gazing back at them and making them an object . The characters need affirmation from one another, but are unable to cope with how the others view them. By having each character stay after wanting to escape, Sartre suggests that we need the agitating presence of others to really know ourselves.

Creating Meaning in Absurdity

Sartre’s setting for the play is absurd. The room is decorated in Second Empire furniture, which was considered ostentatious and outdated by Sartre’s time. The room has no windows, no mirrors, or anything to make it fit for long-term human habitation; it is more akin to a waiting room in a hospital or hotel. The Valet, who escorts the characters to the room and politely answers their questions, reinforces the setting’s sense of transience. The Valet’s existence implies that the afterlife involves a kind of bureaucracy with paid employees. Absurdity mocks the idea that God or the universe endowed humans with meaning, and shares this with existentialism.

The three protagonists try to create meaning in surroundings that offer none. All three characters are certain they are in hell, when the only sure thing is that they are all dead. Garcin asks the Valet where the “instruments of torture” are, alluding to the eternal punishment that is supposed to await sinners in hell (4). Estelle and Inez quickly agree with him (17). They all initially assume that the other two are supposed to torment them in some way. Inez convinces Estelle and Garcin that nothing about the room is random. She says: “I tell you they’ve thought it all out. Down to the last detail. Nothing was left to chance. This room was all set for us” (15). It is never made clear who “they” are, nor does the audience ever get confirmation that this “they” exists. After sharing their life stories, the three become convinced they have been placed together for their sins. Nothing ever confirms these beliefs, yet these beliefs structure the entire play.

Sartre uses  the absurd environment to highlight existentialist concepts, such as “existence precedes essence.” The characters believe in the opposite, that essence precedes existence. They think that there is some essence (intention by the overseers of hell) that precedes and creates the existence of the room (its arrangement, decoration choices, and placing the three of them in a room together). Yet the environment refuses to support their claims. Sartre instead illustrates that their interactions propel them into creating meaning for their existence. This is most notable when the door to the room opens (43). None of them can bring themselves to leave because they’ve become “inseparables” (43). Garcin desires the respect of Inez, who he sees as an equal. Estelle wants Garcin to affirm her self-image, and Inez wants to tease Garcin and seduce Estelle.

Inez states that “all of [her] is here, in this room” (30). All of her memories, reason, and purpose only exist between her, Garcin, and Estelle. Any reason she might have to persist as a conscious, thinking person is in the room. The room’s absurdity demonstrates how action precedes meaning.

The Possibility of Redemption

"

Each character carries dark secrets. This leads them to believe they need punishment and/or redemption. Garcin believes that redemption will come from quietly contemplating his own life. He frequently falls into silence to put his “life in order” (13), and believes complete silence will bring their “salvation” (18). Estelle needs Garcin’s love after losing her lover to suicide. Inez is the only one of the three who considers herself irredeemable.

Sartre illustrates that redemption through silence and self-reflection is impossible. Estelle and Inez can’t keep silent and even Garcin himself breaks his own rules to talk to the others. Despite the lack of human amenities like beds, toothbrushes, or mirrors, Inez sings and Estelle applies her makeup. Sartre uses silence in the stage directions and Inez’s sudden break into song to demonstrate how impossible Garcin’s solution is. In spite of being dead, the three of them are still human and have the need to behave as humans. For Sartre, the rationalist and isolated approach to the world is not feasible.

The three need each other’s validation. Shortly after breaking the silence, Estelle says: “When I can’t see myself I begin to wonder if I really and truly exist. I pat myself just to make sure, but it doesn’t help much. […] But everything that goes on in one’s head is so vague, isn’t it?” (19). This prompts Inez to serve as Estelle’s “mirror,” helping her put makeup on as the two talk. Sartre’s concept of the Look is expressed both through the literal looking of the women and through their talking. Inez serves as a metaphorical mirror by telling Estelle exactly how she feels about her. Estelle, afraid of what she sees of herself in this “mirror,” decides that a man’s love will redeem her. Garcin suggests that they must bare themselves to one another like “new-born babes” in order to avert “disaster” (24).

The three of them fixate on this idea of understanding one another. Though redemption from their sins on earth isn’t possible, the characters turn to making the best of a bad situation with the “spark of human feeling” (30). The three fail often at helping one another, yet the notion that they should structures their interactions for much of the play. The protagonists place great emphasis on the interconnectivity between them, as if a “cobweb” lays over them.

Sartre describes himself as an “atheistic existentialist:” Describing his position, he states: “[T]here is no human nature, because there is no God to have a conception of it. Man simply is. […] Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself.” “(“Existentialism Is a Humanism.”) The characters fade from the memory of people on Earth; their interactions with one another in the room, are all that remain. When Inez watches her final view of Earth, she says: “I feel so empty, desiccated—really dead at last. All of me’s here, in this room” (30).

Sartre’s ideas of atheistic existentialism remove the possibility of redemption; the concept of redemption itself implies the existence of a human essence that can be washed clean of sin. People simply are their actions. When Inez and the others fade from Earth, there is nothing to redeem from the viewpoint of existentialist philosophy: Their lives, and their afterlives, simply are. Sartre suggests that the characters suffer partly because they wrongly believe redemption is possible.

The afterlife entails dealing with other people and understanding one’s flaws and actions through their viewpoints. Sartre’s description of atheistic existentialism might imply a solitary self-determination. However, in No Exit, this sense of self-determination is shown to be ineffectual. Each character decides to stay in the room with the others. Garcin’s final line of the play, “Well, well, let’s get on with it….” implies that they continue on together in perpetuity (47). Sartre does not offer his characters redemption, but they are offered proximity with other dead souls. The bond between the three characters is strained, but it is the only thing they have.

"
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text