logo

56 pages 1 hour read

Susan Kuklin

No Choirboy: Murder, Violence, and Teenagers on Death Row

Nonfiction | Book | YA | Published in 2008

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 2 Summary: “The Fourteen-Year-Old Adult”

Mark Melvin, a white youth, was only 14 when he was arrested at his home in Pensacola, Florida, and taken to Alabama to be charged with first-degree murder. Alabama charged Mark as an adult, as is customary in some states when the crime is particularly violent. In his interviews, Mark does not deny the charges; alone of the prisoners profiled in Kuklin’s book, he discusses the murder of which he was convicted in some detail and says not only that he did it but that he fully deserves his punishment.

A fatherless child from an impoverished, unstable home, Mark was lured by a beloved older brother (David) into crossing into Alabama to help eliminate two witnesses: a husband and wife who had agreed to testify against members of Mark’s family. David worked as a correction officer, but Mark did not entirely take seriously his tales of the horrors of prison and pointed reminders of Mark’s complicity in his family’s thefts. Goaded by his brother, Mark nevertheless shot and killed the husband just outside the couple’s house while David killed the wife inside. As soon as he pulled the trigger, Mark knew he had done something irreversible for which he would be severely punished: “I knew I was done for” (39).

Mark explains that the murders, which for months inspired nightmares and suicidal thoughts, upset him more than even his arrest and incarceration. When the police finally came for him, David told Mark to “be strong,” which meant not to talk. David then tried to pin both murders on Mark while lying to him that his wife, whom Mark loved like a sister, was pregnant; he hoped that Mark would sacrifice himself to keep him out of prison. Eventually, Mark refused to play along and gave evidence against his brother, whom he had (temporarily) come to hate for his betrayal.

Mark notes that from childhood he was subject to mood swings and random acts of petty violence, such as hitting his brothers, and that he was never a “good” kid. He grew up with his mother, who was on welfare, and six siblings: five brothers and one sister, all of whom had different fathers. At one point, Mark says, his mother falsely charged him with assault as a ploy to get him locked up, which was the only way she could get him counseling for his behavioral conditions, including stealing and playing hooky. Unfortunately, this put a “history” of violence on his record. The murder he committed for his brother, Mark says, was the one and only time he ever set out to do violence.

In a juvenile facility waiting to be formally charged, Mark was treated like an “animal.” He was placed in an isolation cell where the lights were kept on constantly, and his hands and feet were shackled whenever he went out. His hair was left uncut because the barber was “scared” to go near him. He was shocked to learn that he would be charged as an adult, meaning that he could be sentenced to life without parole. (Death was not a possibility, due to a recent Supreme Court decision that set the minimum age for capital punishment at 16.) Disappointed in his lawyer, he contacted Stevenson, about whom he had heard good things. Stevenson joined Mark’s defense, wrote a lengthy argument that sought to mitigate his culpability, and succeeded in pleading his sentence down to life plus 10 years. To this day, Mark considers Stevenson his best friend.

At Donaldson State Prison, Mark was placed in “level six”—an immense labyrinth of high-security cell blocks. As he arrived, he could hear prisoners exchanging sexual remarks about him; the officer who was escorting him just laughed at his agitation. Mark quickly learned to trust no one and show no weakness or compliance, even in the smallest matters. The violence and cruelty that went on in the maximum-security prison, which had a strong gang presence, was beyond anything he had ever seen. He was especially nervous to find himself in a racial minority at Donaldson. Young, white, and “clean-cut,” he felt himself to be relentlessly targeted by bigger, stronger prisoners who sought to “break” him—to turn him into a sex partner or servant. He knew that he could not rely on the guards to protect him, so he cultivated a reputation as an unstable “daredevil” so others would leave him alone. After getting into several fights and losing two teeth, Mark was transferred to the Holman Correctional Facility.

Mark says he was “happy” at Holman, largely because it had an older, less violent population. He was seldom attacked or molested. Unlike at Donaldson, the prisoners mostly observed a “code” of mutual respect and cooperation, which allowed them a certain degree of autonomy. Mark says he began to “grow” as a person at Holman, abandoning some of the racist attitudes he had acquired at Donaldson and even making some friends. Buddy, an enormous white man who was highly respected at Holman, became an important friend and mentor. Mark began to learn skills such as leatherworking, which improved his self-esteem. The “changes” he experienced at Holman partly restored his faith in human nature and potential; he says he is against the death penalty, which sometimes was carried out on his fellow prisoners at Holman, because he believes everyone has the capacity to change.

Eventually, Mark was transferred to Easterling Correctional Facility, a medium-security facility. He was dismayed to learn that this was to be the end of the line for him: Due to a recent and well-publicized murder committed by a prisoner on work release, he would never be eligible for any pre-release work program. Mark has resigned himself to the reality that Easterling, or places like it, will be his home until his parole, which will not be for many years. He regards Easterling as the most “stressful” of the three prisons he has been in; its squalor, constant heat, crowdedness, tedium, and byzantine rules sometimes make him lose all hope for the future. He finds distraction in his hobbies, which include playing the electric guitar and drawing; he even makes some pocket change as a portrait artist for the other prisoners. As far as companionship, he has overcome his initial aversion to relationships with men and regards himself as bisexual.

If he is ever released, Mark would like to devote himself to helping others—possibly “troubled” kids like his 14-year-old self. All the same, he worries that his mindless act so many years ago utterly precludes any hope for a decent life, or even self-love of the most basic sort: “A theft or a burglary can leave you, but a murder can’t” (80).

Chapter 2 Analysis

Mark seems just as far removed from the public image of the remorseless, sociopathic killer as Roy. Mark too had no serious crimes on his police blotter, and his involvement in murder seems, like Roy’s, to have been the direct result of the influence of older and more callous acquaintances. By his account, he went along with the murder plot unthinkingly until he pulled the trigger, at which point the full reality of what he had done broke over him, jolting him with dread and remorse. In interviews 12 years later, he seems no less horrified by his actions or any more forgiving of himself than he was at age 14.

Also like Roy’s story, Mark’s illustrates the cruelty of Trying Juveniles as Adults. Though too young to receive the death penalty, Mark was spared a sentence of life without parole only due to the efforts of the lawyer Stevenson. Inexplicably, Mark’s previous lawyer had arranged a plea for life without parole, which was already the harshest sentence he was eligible for. A white youth raised by a single mother on welfare, Mark in some ways contrasts with Roy, who is Black and grew up in a stable, middle-class household with both of his parents. Mark’s poverty, like Roy’s race, was undoubtedly a factor in his harsh sentencing. That same poverty prevented Mark from accessing counseling or psychiatric care in the months leading up to his crime. In a Kafkaesque twist, his mother had to resort to charging him with assault just to get him into a counseling program—a charge later brought up at his trial as evidence of his violent temperament. A recurring motif in Kuklin’s book is the myriad flaws of the social safety net, which she suggests continually fails teenagers—some of the most vulnerable, yet promising members of society.

A slightly built 14-year-old incarcerated with much bigger and stronger adults, Mark had to grow up very quickly. Unlike Roy, he did not have the “buffer” of a stint on death row. However, Mark’s experience at Holman Correctional Facility partly mirrors Roy’s on death row. Like Roy, Mark implies that most convicts, if they live long enough, see the necessity of change or find things to live for, becoming better, kinder people. Also like Roy, Mark credits much of his optimism to his friendship with Stevenson, justifying the lawyer and activist’s faith in the power of kindness, empathy, and respect as catalysts for growth and redemption.

Mark’s present, and perhaps final, institutional home is the Easterling Correctional Facility, a medium-security prison. His ineligibility for work release illustrates the vulnerability of the inmate population to the often arbitrary political decisions driven by sensational news stories. Due to the magnified visibility of violent crimes in the popular media and the consequent public pressure on those who make policy, case-by-case considerations are often steamrolled by one-size-fits-all justice. The situation recalls the media frenzy surrounding mythical “super-predators” of the late 1980s and early 1990s following the (coerced) confessions of the Central Park Five, which led to a marked increase in juveniles being prosecuted as adults and sentenced to hard time (“Youth Tried as Adults.” Juvenile Law Center, 2022).

Mark, who in prison has become a skilled artist and overcome his prejudices against Black people and gay people, seems to exemplify Stevenson’s faith in the potential of the young to develop their minds, consciences, and talents, even in the direst of places. Mark considers Easterling to be the most stressful institution he has lived in and characterizes his present life as “miserable.” Nevertheless, he refuses to give up on even the most vicious criminals known to him: He opposes the death penalty, he says, because “[c]hanges can take place in people. Spiritual changes that can change a person. Changes took place in me” (68).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Susan Kuklin