36 pages • 1 hour read
Chris VossA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In contrast with prevailing perspectives of the past, Voss suggests that negotiation is best understood as a primarily emotional process rather than a dry, rational exchange. To him, negotiation is just human nature. This realization spurred him and his colleagues at the FBI to develop a distinct and practical format for negotiation, grounded in experience and psychology. Most of the techniques he discusses throughout Never Split the Difference are methods to uncover, modify, or simply take advantage of a counterpart’s emotional state. Mirroring, for instance, exploits a biological tendency to elaborate, while labeling emotions drains them of their urgency. Allowing counterparts to say “no” and getting them to say “that’s right” are both touted as methods to facilitate emotional security and understanding on a deeper level. The goal is not just to bring emotions out into the open, but also to move your counterpart in a direction that advances your interests in the negotiation. Sometimes this entails calming down a stressed or anxious counterpart. It can also involve coaxing a shy counterpart to speak up, a pushy counterpart to slow down and reconsider, or whatever else the situation requires.
That’s not to say that every negotiation involves extreme emotions and deep, empathetic connection. Even in relatively low-key negotiations, knowledge of the ways in which human behavior is predictably irrational can be instrumental. For instance, a negotiator who understands loss aversion can generate stronger leverage than one who relies only on positive leverage. Similarly, using a range of numbers to anchor a counterpart can shift perceptions of fairness to favor a desired outcome. Although some readers may consider such tactics manipulative, Voss implies that ignoring human nature when negotiating is simply irrational.
The text also warns negotiators to be aware of their own human limitations. Even the most skilled negotiators are susceptible to their own emotions, which can sometimes urge them toward counterproductive behaviors. Negotiators who are insufficiently open to and curious about new developments—including black swans—may miss out on significant opportunities.
In addition to demonstrating how effective negotiators work, Voss comments on the functions and value of negotiation in various contexts. Particularly in the first and last chapters, where Voss discusses the value of negotiation most explicitly, he refers to it as an essential skill in both professional and personal settings. Anecdotes set in both contexts are featured throughout, although the business-related anecdotes heavily outnumber the personal ones. The bulleted lists of main ideas that close each chapter frequently touch on both areas as well. For this reason, Never Split the Difference can be read as a business book, a self-help book, or both.
Within the personal sphere, Voss suggests that negotiation is not so much about getting your way as it is about getting to a better place for everyone. This is best illustrated by his account of his son’s unwillingness to adapt to his new position on his football team. Only by really listening to and considering his son’s perspective does Voss manage to identify, label, and resolve his son’s concerns. Somewhat counterintuitively, then, Voss’s willingness to address conflict and misunderstanding improves his relationship with his son, implying that the same can occur in any interpersonal negotiation in which each side genuinely cares for the other’s welfare.
The same is not always true in business negotiations. Since the business world is competitive by nature, and since some negotiations take place in a zero-sum game, improving your outcome within a negotiation does not necessarily imply that the other party will be better off as well. Voss reminds readers that it is their responsibility to determine which outcomes are worth negotiating for. Rather than feeling guilty about getting too good a deal, they should remember that no counterpart would agree to a deal that didn’t carry some benefit. Additionally, adopting Voss’s style of negotiation, in which each party seeks to empathize with the other and discover better solutions together, rather than simply splitting the difference, can uncover truly creative solutions, providing more value for everyone.
As he considers and demonstrates the elements of effective negotiation, Voss also points out several pitfalls and barriers that can derail the process. The most obvious of these is the use of force or the demonstration of open hostility toward a counterpart. This typically leads to escalating emotions and may also incite a counterpart to retaliate. Voss’s failure to negotiate a deal in the hostage situation involving American missionaries falls into this category, as both sides grew increasingly hostile until violence broke out.
More subtle but equally damaging to negotiation is dishonest or deceptive communication. Because they are so often used to cover up concerns or mollify a counterpart, Voss warns readers about receiving a counterfeit “yes” response or hearing “you’re right” instead of “that’s right.” He also offers tips for spotting dishonest communication by watching for the Pinocchio effect. Dishonesty prevents effective negotiation since it stops a negotiator from understanding a counterpart; it also signals that the one who lies may have concerns or hidden motivations that could prevent a deal.
A third barrier comes in the form of problems with implementation. This can occur when there are hidden policymakers and stakeholders on either side who do not participate in the negotiation but have veto power. Even a seemingly simple deviation from an agreed-upon plan can interfere with its success, as happened when a SWAT officer took a handheld radio from an inmate in the story that opens Chapter 8.
These are not the only barriers to effective negotiation, but they are some of the most common ones mentioned by Voss. Taken together, they suggest just how delicate the negotiation process is: Anything that interferes with any part of the process can potentially put an end to it.