65 pages • 2 hours read
Erica Armstrong DunbarA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Chapter 4 opens with the Washingtons and their enslaved Black workforce returning to Mount Vernon for several months before relocating to Philadelphia, which was now the nation’s capital. Dunbar speculates about how Judge must have felt returning to the South after spending so much time in the North, engaging with free Black people and a different, more urban way of life: “Her eyes would miss the spotting of free Black men and women in the marketplace, and her ears longed for discreet conversations about black freedom” (50).
While the Washingtons move, statesmen argue over the location of a “‘Federal City’ that was separate and apart from any other city or state government” (52). A compromise ensures the “Federal City” will be close to Virginia—something the Washingtons wanted, though they never lived there as first family.
Unhappy with the service of the white indentured servants they employed in New York, the Washingtons bring additional enslaved Black workers with them to Philadelphia. Six of the seven Black individuals brought to New York also accompany them to the new capital. Dunbar describes the new house in Philadelphia, explaining the décor, living arrangements, and social activities of the Washingtons. Most importantly, the enslaved Black folks once again live in close quarters with free white people and are exposed to ideas they might not have encountered otherwise.
In Chapter 5, Dunbar introduces a critical historical fact that influences the Washingtons’ decisions for years to follow. At the time of their move to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania had a law that “required the emancipation of all adult slaves who were brought in the commonwealth for more than a period of six months” (62). If the Washingtons’ enslaved laborers found out about the law, they could use it to their advantage, as had happened with a friend of the Washingtons who warned them about the situation.
To highlight the situation in Philadelphia, Dunbar delves into the history of Pennsylvania’s antislavery movement, which dates back almost to the founding of the colony. She provides a brief history of Quakers, whose influence eventually leads to the establishment of the six-month law that causes difficulties for the Washingtons. Their solution is to rotate their slaves to and from Mount Vernon (or elsewhere) every six months to keep the slaves from being able to claim emancipation under the law.
The Washingtons concoct reasons for the shuffle, going so far as to claim that sending Judge’s brother, Austin, ahead is to allow him to see his family, as opposed to resetting the amount of time that he’s been in Philadelphia. Though the Washingtons attempt to conceal the truth from their slaves, doing so is impossible, given the closeness of living quarters and the presence of free Black people and abolitionists who could pass on information. Hercules, the cook, finds out the laws and learns that the Washingtons do not trust him despite his record of service. Hercules chooses to remain enslaved to protect his family though Dunbar notes that six years later, “Hercules ran away and was never seen again” (73). The reader therefore cannot misinterpret Hercules’s choice to be content with his position, as racist arguments assert.
Dunbar begins Chapter 6 by noting some of the ways in which the Washingtons treated their slaves “well,” including allowing them to attend the theater and giving them money with which to purchase presents for family members in Mount Vernon. These allowances establish how the Washingtons allowed some freedoms; however, Dunbar also notes that the Washingtons carefully kept their slaves from encountering free Black people and anyone else who might poison their minds with notions of freedom.
Dunbar contends that Judge’s decision to remain with the Washingtons is likely driven by the fact that “she must have felt relatively safe in the President’s House,” (78), whereas running away or being emancipated only to be caught by another master could cause numerous other problems, including harder labor or sexual violence. With this discussion, Dunbar starts to delve into the vulnerability of Black women, who are at a disadvantage due to race and gender, and often subject to greater threats and difficulties than white women or Black men.
Turnover begins at the Washingtons’ house in Philadelphia, with some enslaved being sent back to Mount Vernon permanently due to injury or impudence. With the arrival of yellow fever, the Washingtons and their slaves return to Mount Vernon to wait out the spread of the disease. As the disease spreads, many free Black residents offer to help “as nurses and grave diggers” (83), based on the incorrect belief that Black people are immune to yellow fever. Free Black leaders see the epidemic as a way for Black people to gain white trust by helping. Instead, Black people are “accused of exploiting white vulnerability” (84).
During this period of moving and disease, Judge’s brother and mother both die. Losing her brother deprives Judge of the only family she has in the North while losing her mother deprives her of the only other direct family she has left. With this revelation, Dunbar demonstrates how Judge’s mindset begins to move toward freedom, as one of the few reasons for remaining enslaved is staying close to one’s family.
Chapter 7 begins with the news that Martha’s granddaughter, Eliza, is engaged to Thomas Law, a man 20 years her senior, whom George and Martha had not previously known. As Martha’s children had already died, and George and Martha have no children together, their grandchildren are extremely important to them. Not only is Eliza’s betrothed a foreigner, but he also has three biracial children from previous relationships. Judge and her fellow enslaved workers are in a precarious position of dealing with the Washingtons’ displeasure, particularly Martha’s.
Nearly in conjunction with Eliza’s announcement comes George’s decision not to seek a third term as president and Martha’s decision to give Judge to Eliza as a wedding gift. Dunbar notes, “Even though Judge had claimed one of the most revered positions within the Executive Mansion, she would always be a slave” (96). Moreover, “Judge must have worried that she might be the next target of Thomas Law’s sexual interest’ (97), given his obvious interest in nonwhite women. With her family gone and facing frightening prospects for her future—Eliza was reportedly even more temperamental than Martha—Judge must make a key decision while she is still in Philadelphia and has the possibility of escape.
Chapters 4-7 of Never Caught cover the time during which the Washingtons, and by extension Judge, live in Philadelphia. Dunbar uses her explanation and assessment of this time to set up the reasons for Judge seeking her freedom. Essentially, Dunbar establishes a list of pros and cons for Judge’s escape. On the pro side, Judge will be her own master, able to work and live without belonging to another human being, especially one of questionable disposition. On the con side, she will be vulnerable to possible recapture, physical and sexual violence, and poverty, and would remain subject to racial inequity. She will also lose touch with her remaining family and quite possibly endanger them due to the Washingtons’ ire at her escape.
Though the cons of running away seem significantly greater and more frightening than the pros, escape carries one key benefit: freedom. This highlights the theme of Freedom and the Myth of the “Noble” Enslaver. Enslaved Black people were caught in a terrible position of powerlessness: remaining enslaved was degrading and inhuman; no one should have to be given money for their labor as if it were a special treat, or be sold off to other families as chattel. Yet, emancipating oneself, especially in the event of recapture—could mean a fate worse than one’s current position. By describing so many difficulties Judge will face in such detail, Dunbar emphasizes that freedom, no matter the cost, is still preferable to bondage.
Eliza Custis’s marriage introduces another aspect to the text: English colonialism in India and the legitimizing of interracial children. Her fiancé, Thomas Law, was an Englishman and executive of the East India Company, from which he made his fortune. He had three children from a relationship with an Indian woman, and he brought these children to the US. Law was anti-slavery though evidently pro-colonialism, and he settled in New York before marrying Eliza. Though he never married the mother of his three sons, he raised them as his own with all the privileges he enjoyed as a wealthy white man in American society. With their foreign status and prominent father, the boys—George, John, and Edmund—were essentially treated as white despite being half Indian. Such an arrangement was rare for white Americans who had mixed-race children and almost unthinkable for individuals in the South. Judge was right to worry about being subject to Law’s sexual interests. After separating from Eliza, Law had a son with an enslaved Black woman. This shows the uncertainties women like Judge were subjected to under slavery and informs the motif of the vulnerability of Black female bodies in this era.
By Erica Armstrong Dunbar