71 pages • 2 hours read
Orhan PamukA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Black reads and rereads Shekure’s letter and later dreams that they are married and happy but that he is unable to find a job. After waking, he realizes his dream was inspired by a book that contained a list of the benefits of marriage, including “being spared the guilt of self-abuse” (51). With this idea in mind, Black tries to masturbate but cannot do so because of his love for Shekure. After looking at the painting he’d made for Shekure years earlier, Black decides to write her back.
Black heads to the workshop of the Head Illuminator, Master Osman, where the elderly man trains young artists. Having not seen Osman for 15 years, Black notices the Master appears older and reminds him of a ghost. He also senses that Osman hates Enishte.
Interested in artists from other locations, Osman questions Black about the different places he’s visited and the styles of painting he’s encountered. Black relates that many artists now create single works rather than large books. Osman tells Black about Elegant, explaining that the miniaturist has been missing for six days, and that the miniaturists now work from home. A younger painter gives Black a tour of the workshop.
As Black says goodbye to Osman, he asks, “what separates the genuine miniaturist from the ordinary?” (60). Osman ask an artist three questions to determine his genuineness. The first assesses the miniaturist’s respect for European styles of painting. The second asks for the artist to explain the differences between Allah’s time and human time. The final question is about blindness. Black decides to ask each of the three miniaturists (Olive, Butterfly, and Stork) these questions.
In response to Black’s question about individuality in painting, Butterfly explains that as long as artists desire money and fame above appreciating the process, art will be vulgar. He then provides Black with three short parables about style and signature.
The first parable is about a young Khan interested in painting. This Khan loved one of the women in his harem and she returned his love. The lovers wanted to live forever and found that they felt time stop when they looked at paintings of the old masters. One miniaturist painted the Khan and his beloved in place of famous literary lovers. However, recognizing themselves in the painting made the Khan suspicious of his beloved. To make her jealous, the Khan slept with another woman, causing his beloved to kill herself. Realizing that the miniaturist’s decision to depict him and his love led to this awful event, the Khan ordered the artist blinded.
The second parable is about an elderly Sultan who had a beautiful Chinese wife. His son from an earlier marriage also fell in love with this wife. Frustrated by his feelings, the son focused on painting as a way to escape and became a gifted artist. The wife, recognizing the genius of the young man, encouraged the son to sign his paintings so his work would be recognized. However, the first painting he signed depicted Hüsrev’s son killing his father. The Sultan, seeing the painting, became fearful and believed the picture represented not a story but reality. The Sultan’s fears were realized when his son stabbed him in the heart.
The third parable tells of a Shah who decided to marry his only child, a daughter, to a miniaturist. To select the most talented miniaturist, the Shah held a competition in which each painter needed to recreate a well-known scene of a beautiful maiden in a garden. The victor, however, did not please the daughter: The painting contained no aspect of her features, which she assumed meant that the painter did not love her. Therefore, the wedding was cancelled, and the daughter never wed.
Explaining these parables, Butterfly tells Black that individual style is actually imperfection and that signing one’s artwork is a way to celebrate such imperfection. As Black leaves, Butterfly thinks to himself that he is the best miniaturist as he experiences ecstasy when creating art, which he believes means he can see the world through God’s eyes.
Arriving at Stork’s house, Black asks the miniaturist how he thinks of time. Stork offers three parables to explain his thoughts.
The first story is set in the time when Baghdad fell to the Mongols. At this time, a famed calligrapher thought that his books would last forever. However, the Mongols shredded his books, burned them, and threw their ashes into the river. Watching the destruction, the man swore to never write again. Instead, he began to paint, which inspired a 300-year renaissance of painting for Arab artists.
In the second story, a shah replaced the pictures of a khan he defeated with his own image. However, the most beautiful concubine of the former ruler made the shah promise not to alter a book illustration that depicted her and the deceased khan as the famous literary lovers. The shah agreed at first, but, haunted by the image, eventually drew his own face over that of the khan. His depiction was inaccurate, though, and soon after another shah who looked more like the image defeated him and took the beautiful concubine.
The last story is about an illustrator known for his ability to mimic the old masters. This artist became famous for his lack of individual style. At age 119, though, he fell in love with a 16-year-old apprentice and used deceit and manipulation to seduce the boy. One day, when staring at the apprentice, the artist caught a cold and the following day he went blind. Two days later he died.
Stork provides Black with a gloss of two of the three stories: The first story shows that time, not the artist, makes a picture perfect; the second story shows that escaping time is only possible through skill. Stork then asks Black to explain the final story and Black states that the story shows how forsaking the morally perfect artistic life will lead to death.
Black asks Olive about his understanding of blindness in relation to the artist. Olive explains his thoughts in three stories.
In his first story, an artist illustrated a book for his ruler. However, the ruler began to fear that a better version of the book might later be created for his enemy. The ruler decided to kill the artist, but was dissuaded by one of his concubines, who convinced the leader to blind the artist instead. After the artist was blinded, he went to the enemy, offering his services. From memory he then recreated a more beautiful version of the book, which led to the eventual defeat of the first ruler.
In the second story, each new ruler of the Ottoman Empire took the books written for the former ruler and created new versions celebrating his own reign. However, in one instance, the order of the pages became mixed up. The oldest head miniaturist, who was blind, had to rely on his memories and the help of a child to put the books together again.
Stork’s final story explains how one miniaturist believed blindness was Allah’s gift to artists who worked faithfully in his service. Indeed, this artist believed that “Allah’s vision of His world only becomes manifest through the memory of blind miniaturists” (80).
After his stories, Olive reiterates his belief that blindness is a gift from Allah. Black responds that he has heard of miniaturists who pretend to go blind because they view it as a sign of Allah’s grace. During their discussion, a young apprentice knocks at the door and informs them that Elegant’s body has been found.
These chapters reveal the world of the Istanbul miniaturists and provide context for the tension between more conservative and more progressive styles of painting. Black recognizes Osman, the master of the miniaturist’s workshop, as a ghostly figure. This depiction symbolizes the fading of the traditional miniaturists and the way that the creation of a secret book with European style illustrations threatens the practice of Islamic manuscript illumination.
The questions that Osman posits will provide Black with a clear assessment of each of the three miniaturist’s position regarding art. Each question, though, is meant to privilege the traditional and conservative understanding of illustration and painting. Thus, the first question, about style, is meant to ascertain if the miniaturists are content to learn the techniques of all miniaturists or if they are prideful and intent to develop their own unique painting and drawing styles. Butterfly’s answers to this question posit that individual style is a conflicted issue. In his first two parables, Butterfly alludes to the dangers of representational art and how depicting realistic individuals could create chaos. However, in his third parable, Butterfly subtly suggests that without individuality and realism, artwork never represents the truth.
The question posed to Stork, which concerns whether the miniaturist understands time from Allah’s or a moral perspective, also results in conflicted answers. Stork’s three stories argue that the desire for art to live on after the artist’s deaths impacts that artist’s work. If the artist is focused on the divine, his art will be immortalized. However, if his artwork is motivated by a desire for posthumous fame, the artist’s work will be forgotten.
Olive answers the third question, which concerns blindness. Unlike Butterfly and Stork, Olive upholds the traditional views of artists in his answers. His three stories tell of artists who became blind through their artistic devotion to Allah. According to Olive, blindness is a gift bestowed on those who give up their individuality in order to paint from Allah’s perspective.
In this section—as well as in the chapters featuring the drawings of the dog and the tree—Pamuk slips into parable, demonstrating an example of Nested Narrative Storytelling in the Islamic World. Rather than directly answering Black’s questions, the miniaturists he interviews respond with elliptical stories meant to convey a moral or ethical lesson. This style of storytelling is completely different from the realism inherent in the novel: Instead of depicting a specific set of artists in a workshop, or a particular family and its dynamics, the worlds of the parables offer stock figures whose inner lives do not reflect lived experience but are flattened to achieve a specific effect. The inclusion of these nested stories within the framing narrative of Pamuk’s novel plays on Western stereotypes of the East as mysterious and enigmatic—a harmful and alienating portrayal. The parables may appear as euphemisms to avoid hard discussions, but they also offer answers with complex shades of meaning and nuance that more direct speech would not provide.
By Orhan Pamuk
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Art
View Collection
Beauty
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Globalization
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Middle Eastern Literature
View Collection
Nobel Laureates in Literature
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
The Future
View Collection
The Past
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection