39 pages • 1 hour read
Transl. Richard Seaver, Transl. Helen R. Lane, André BretonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Manifestoes of Surrealism begins with a preface written by author André Breton to accompany a 1929 reprint of his original 1924 manifesto. The preface speculates about the meaning of reprinting works and about the influence of the Surrealist movement on the wider world during the previous five years. Breton mentions that the movement also faced controversy, but he does not elaborate about what that entailed. The background of this controversy can be found in other sections of Manifestoes of Surrealism and mostly involves the political positions of individual Surrealists, in contrast to that of the movement as a whole. He explains why he is not updating the manifesto: Although some former Surrealists left the movement, new ones entered it, and the character of the world changed, the underlying principles of the work remain the same. Breton also speaks on his own life; Surrealism did not change the world to any great degree, and he sometimes wonders why he continues to live, but he is becoming more comfortable with finding small sources of inspiration and wonder.
The preface begins with a philosophical question about the nature of being a writer. Evaluating his work in retrospect, Breton believes that his own status as the writer is irrelevant. When he reads his own words, they mean no more to him than if they were written by someone else. He questions whether it is possible for him to know anything of value about the work or to provide any new insight that was not already reflected in the original work.
The first "Manifesto of Surrealism," published in 1924, outlines the philosophical underpinnings of the Surrealist movement. Compiled by André Breton, the manifesto is presented as a collaborative effort among multiple people involved in the Surrealist movement. The work begins with a criticism of rationality. Breton believes that the world is overly rationalized and “realistic.” He blames early philosophers, such as Saint Thomas Aquinas, with promoting rational realism over imagination. Because of this, scientific thought is prized, while superstition and contemplation are derided. As the world began to understand more about science, logic almost completely replaced imagination, to the detriment of creative thinking. Breton and his surrealist contemporaries hope to counteract the influence of logic. They believe that thinking and acting in a manner that is too structured and predictable damaged humans' ability to create new ideas. They are particularly critical of the modern novel and other creative works derived from realistic experiences. Breton writes, “It consistently feeds on and derives strength from the newspapers and stultifies both science and art by assiduously flattering the lowest of tastes; clarity bordering on stupidity, a dog’s life” (6).
Breton presents two major examples to argue that abstract, imaginative thinking is a natural human condition: children and dreams. He writes that children are not yet corrupted by reason and are free to explore their imaginations without the pressure to think rationally. Breton believes that adults lack imagination only because society told them to; without pressure to be rational at all times, humans would retain their vivid imaginations into adulthood. He cites people who have a severe mental health condition as an example: People with conditions that cause them to lose their ability for strictly logical thinking often think and act with a level of imaginative abstraction that is similar to that of children. Breton is also highly influenced by Sigmund Freud and The Interpretation of Dreams. He believes that dreams are overly discounted by modern humans; waking life is interpreted as reality, but dreams are not. Breton disagrees with this assumption. He argues that there is no way to prove that dreams are less real than the waking world. Instead, they offer a window into the breadth of human imagination that would be possible in waking life as well apart from the influence of logic and reason.
Despite the challenges that Breton sees in bringing wonder and creativity back to modern life, he is optimistic about the concept of freedom. He writes, “Among all the misfortunes to which we are heir, it is only fair to admit that we are allowed the greatest degree of freedom of thought. It is up to us to misuse it” (4). The "First Manifesto," along with the other texts in Manifestoes of Surrealism, shows that Breton believes that misuse of mental freedom is rampant. He sees this as a betrayal of the self and views Surrealism as a valuable means to achieve true freedom of imagination. Even those who experience mental illness and may be labeled as not being free to think as they desire are, in Breton’s view, usually victims of mainstream society’s justice and healthcare systems. In fact, he writes, they may be the most mentally free people, as they often live life without regard to the rules imposed on them by society.
In the second half of the "First Manifesto," Breton offers a specific definition of Surrealism:
Psychic automatism in its pure state, by which one proposes to express—verbally, by means of the written word, or in any other manner—the actual functioning of thought. Dictated by thought, in the absence of any control exercised by reason, exempt from any aesthetic or moral concern (26).
He also provides a list of various writers, thinkers, and artists throughout history who he believes were Surrealists in particular ways. He writes, for example: “Poe is a Surrealist in adventure”; “Hugo is a Surrealist when he isn’t stupid”; and “Roussel is Surrealist as a storyteller” (27). Breton recognizes that Surrealist thinking is not unique to himself and his contemporaries. What sets the Surrealist movement apart, he writes, is a wholehearted commitment to Surrealism as an artistic style, a basis for political belief, and a lifestyle. Becoming a Surrealist, he writes, is an unescapable change in thinking that dominates the Surrealist’s entire life.
"Soluble Fish" opens on a dreamlike scene: An expansive castle is set in a park bustling with myriad fantastical characters. They include figures like a 200-year-old phantom who “still speaks a bit of French” (52), a woman dreaming of black walnut trees, and maidservants wearing satin tights “the color of daylight” (52). The unnamed protagonist hopes to meet with the mistress of the mansion, who is described as “an American grapevine, of the sort most recently acclimated to France that produces seeds of that purple foxglove whose full flavor has not been savored” (53). The protagonist kisses the woman and is then transported through a series of visions, a cabaret, a crane “lifting packages heavenward that must have been hair” (54), and into the future.
Each section of "Soluble Fish" presents a different surrealist scene. In one chapter, Breton describes a large water trough where “at nightfall the disturbing animals and surprise-plants still left in Paris come to refresh themselves” (64). In another, a woman’s torso, which may or may not be a mannequin, floats down the Seine while an enormous wasp flies around the city and sings. Another passage describes a turkey standing on a dike, gazing into a Venetian mirror, while an enormous top hat full of jellyfish swings nearby.
Although "Soluble Fish" does not have a straightforward plot or narrative arc, certain imagery and themes appear repeatedly throughout the text. The most prominent of these is sexuality; almost every section uses imaginative erotic imagery to describe a woman or groups of women, who are often interacting with the protagonist. Erotic imagery is sometimes presented in a straightforward matter: “The woman with the breasts of ermine was standing at the entrance of the passage Jouffroy in the light of songs. She readily consented to follow me” (89). In other instances, it appears in more abstract contexts: “The young man, the one whose cigar ash was a young blonde who he could make out very well by lowering his eyes and who gave signs of unparalleled excitement, gave his arm to the second man, whose cigar ash, a brunette, had already fallen” (76).
Animals and insects of all types appear throughout "Soluble Fish." Often, the creatures are highly anthropomorphized: “I met the wasp with the waist of a pretty woman and it asked me the way” (56). Similar imagery describes non-human creatures that can think rationally and speak human language as well as any human that appears in the text. Animals are also used metaphorically and allegorically in passages such as the following: “Birds lose their form after they lose their colors. They are reduced to a spider-like existence so deceptive that I throw the gauntlet down far away” (57). This tendency is also evident in the following passage: “I shall one day be received by my brother, that charming mollusk who has the property of being able to fly underwater” (105).
The first "Manifesto of Surrealism" profoundly influenced the art world at the time of its publication. Breton and his contemporaries were involved in the earlier Dada movement, and Surrealism was seen as an extension and reconfiguration of many Dada principles. Both Dada and early Surrealism were a direct response to the mainstream culture of the 1910s and early 1920s, especially the politics surrounding World War I. This influence can be seen in the first manifesto: Breton is disillusioned with modern society and believes that as the world becomes more and more ruled by logic, logic will continue to produce violent conflicts and political decisions that are anti-humanity. He also believes that logic will ruin art; if art and writing are prized for their realism, there will eventually be nothing to distinguish art as a creative act, as opposed to simply a record of history.
As a writer himself, Breton is most directly concerned with the future of creative literature. He proposes a specific set of steps to combat what he sees as boring modern writing: realistic novels with bland imagery and predictable plots. His proposal, directly influenced by Freudian psychology, includes a strong focus on tapping into the human subconscious. In Breton’s mind, most writers overthink their content and try too hard to make connections to real-world events and everyday life. He sees this as counterintuitive and suggests “psychic automatism,” a creative process that taps into the deepest parts of the subconscious and unveils universal truths, rather than simple recreating what appears to be truth within a writer's very specific cultural and historical context. This requires one to write without consciously planning out the results of this act. By writing down the first words and phrases that come to mind, the writer will be able to capture the mind’s deepest reality. The Surrealists believe that if this process is done correctly and without any conscious tweaking, it will produce work that captures the most basic truths of the human condition.
Although Breton is adamant in his rejection of logic, he does not believe that Surrealist writing or art will inherently change anything about the world. He views the movement as a rejection of pure rationality but not necessarily as an antidote to it. In the second half of the manifesto, he explains that Surrealist thinking is more helpful in reawakening individual minds to creative thinking than in achieving wide societal change. He believes that most people are eager to free their minds, even if they are unaware of this desire. When analyzing a selection of Surrealist phrases, he writes, “All of these images seem to attest to the fact that the mind is ripe for something more than the benign joys it allows itself in general” (39). While the first half of the manifesto presents a broad criticism of logic and rationality, the second half acts as a manual that specifically caters to an audience of fellow artists. Breton hopes to inspire young creatives to reject the pressure to work within the logical framework of the world and to stop worrying about making art that is conventionally meaningful. He believes that when artists try too hard to convey meaning, their work becomes generic, overwrought, and ultimately less meaningful than works that are based on pure imagination.
In his first Surrealist manifesto, Breton lays out his process of achieving psychic automatism; in “Soluble Fish,” he puts that process into practice. The text, which was originally released as a stand-alone novel, does not adhere to a strict narrative plot structure. Instead, individual vignettes that are mostly unrelated to each other are built using descriptive imagery. The title “Soluble Fish” was a common phrase among early Surrealists. It is an intentional non sequitur: A fish is by definition a creature of the water; therefore, if a fish were soluble, it would either cease to exist or no longer be a fish. “Soluble Fish” was the most ambitious work that Breton produced using psychic automatism, and the imagery within the text inspired a number of later works by Surrealist writers and visual artists.
The content of “Soluble Fish” acts as a window into the validity of physic automatism itself. Breton reported writing it with no conscious knowledge of what his mind would produce, and he believed that whatever the product ended up being would be a more valid reflection of the subconscious than a realistic—and, to him, overthought—novel. The imagery and narrative of “Soluble Fish” reflect this process. The book does not make strictly logical sense. Words and phrases appear in unexpected contexts; characters appear and disappear; and the reader is shifted rapidly from one surreal scene to another. In this way, the book is very similar to a dream. Often, the text guides the reader toward a specific and vivid mental image, only to break that image with a detail that calls what is happening in the scene into question. The section about two cigar-smoking men exemplifies this. At first, the passage seems to be a straightforward description of two friends who are smoking while on a walk. Then, Breton describes the cigars as a brunette and a blonde. The novel does not reveal whether the cigars are a metaphor for women or if surrealist experimentation is at play.
Psychic autonomists strove to reveal deep truths about the human mind and reveal the subconscious as reality, a major theme of the book. However, although “Soluble Fish” was reportedly written without forethought, the text remains very tied to the specific time and place it which it was written and to its author's lifestyle. This is most obvious in its repeated imagery related to upper-class French life, which Breton simultaneously reviled and idealized in many of his works. The phrase “a meaningless castle rolled along the surface of the earth” (51), for example, reveals the author’s disdain for wealth and materialism. Other scenes appear to be more thoroughly surreal, particularly the passage about the turkey on the dike, gazing into a mirror, in the vicinity of a top hat filled with jellyfish. This image does not appear to be tied to any specific context and is, in fact, related to a Surrealist exercise that is discussed later in the book, in which an entire story is written using only the unrelated words “turkey” and “top hat." Unlike much of “Soluble Fish," which appears to be tightly linked to Breton’s fascination with Freudian psychology, this scene reflects Surrealism's Dada roots, which embraced pure randomness over finding meaning in the subconscious.
Art
View Collection
Beauty
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
French Literature
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Power
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
War
View Collection