logo

50 pages 1 hour read

J. Hector St. John de Crèvecœur

Letters From An American Farmer

Nonfiction | Collection of Letters | Adult | Published in 1782

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Letters IX-XIIChapter Summaries & Analyses

Letter IX Summary: “Description of Charles Town; Thoughts on Slavery; on Physical Evil; a Melancholy Scene”

James describes Charles Town (modern-day Charleston, South Carolina) as a place of great wealth, where “the produce of this extensive territory concentrates” and thus is a place that “is called the centre of our beau monde and is always filled with the richest planters in the province, who resort hither in quest of health and pleasure” (151). However, he also highlights the exploitation and abuse that produces this wealth, which remains unacknowledged in the town, asking “[w]hile all is joy, festivity, and happiness in Charles Town, would you imagine that scenes of misery overspread in the country?” (153).

He condemns the refusal of the rich, contented inhabitants of Charles Town to acknowledge the torture on which their luxury is based, stating that “[t]heir ears by habit are become deaf, their hearts hardened; they neither see, hear, nor feel for the woes of their poor slaves, from whose painful labours all their wealth proceeds” (153). He also condemns slavery and the slave trade for stealing human beings from Africa for the profits of white enslavers, declaring that “by virtue of […] gold, wars, murders, and devastations are committed in some harmless, peaceable African neighbourhood where dwelt innocent people” (153). He even considers the unnaturalness of such abuse, asking, “Oh, Nature, where art thou? Are not these blacks thy children as well as we?” (154).

James considers that he is “so raw, so inexperienced […] in this mode of life,” that if he were a planter and slaveowner, “never could I rest in peace; my sleep would be perpetually disturbed by a retrospect of the frauds committed in Africa” (155). He wonders if it is “possible that the force of custom” could ever render him “as insensible to the injustice of that trade […] as the rich inhabitants of this town seem to be” (155). He concludes that he has “not resided here long enough to become insensible to the pain for the objects which I every day behold” (156).

James acknowledges that they “have slaves likewise in our northern provinces,” but while he hopes that “the time draws near when they will be all emancipated,” he insists that they are in a far better situation than the enslaved people of the South, “in every possible respect!” (156). He declares that slaves in the North “enjoy as much liberty as their masters; they are as well clad and as well fed; […] they live under the same roof and are, truly speaking, a part of our families” (156). He also suggests that “they participate in many of the benefits of our society without being obliged to bear any of its burdens” (156), and that “far from repining at their fate, they think themselves happier than many of the lower class of whites” (157).

James considers the pro-slavery arguments he has heard, which state that “slavery cannot be so repugnant to human nature as we at first imagine because it has been practiced in all ages and in all nations” (158). From this, he begins to consider the darker aspects of humanity’s history, asking “[t]he history of the earth! Doth it present anything but crimes of the most heinous nature,” and suggesting that “man, an animal of prey, seems to have rapine and the love of bloodshed implanted in his heart” (159).

He considers the role of nature in this, too, observing that “[i]n the moments of our philanthropy, we often talk of an indulgent nature, a kind parent […] Yet if we attentively view this globe, will it not appear rather a place of punishment than of delight?” (160-61). He considers “the frigid sterility of the north,” “those countries of Asia subject to pestilential infections which lay Nature to waste,” and “the poisonous soil of the equator, at those putrid slimy tracks, teeming with horrid monsters” (161).

While these harsh climates seem to produce suffering, “[e]ven under those mild climates which seem to breath peace and happiness, the poison of slavery, the fury of despotism, and the rage of superstition are all combined against man!” (162). He begins to question “civilized society,” and asks where “nature intended we should be happy,” and whether “you would prefer the state of men in the woods to that of men in a more improved situation” (163). He concludes that “the vices and miseries to be found in the latter exceed those of the former, in which real evil is more scarce, more supportable, and less enormous” (163).

Finally, James presents a distressing scene that should “account for these melancholy reflections” (163). Having been invited to dinner with a local plantation owner, he decided to walk “through a pleasant wood” (163) to meet him. In the wood, he found “a Negro, suspended in [a] cage and left there to expire!” (164). He discovers that “birds had already picked out his eyes; his cheek-bones were bare, his arms had been attacked in several places” (164). If James had “had a ball in [his] gun” then James would have shot the man, “mercifully with one blow to end this dreadful scene of agonizing torture!” (164), but he does not. At the plantation, the planter explains that the man killed an overseer. The plantation owner goes on to support “the doctrine of slavery with the arguments generally made use of to justify the practice” (165).

Letter X Summary: “On Snakes; and on the Humming-Bird”

At Mr. F.B.’s insistence, James discusses American snakes, clarifying first that he has “very little to observe” on the issue apart aside from two specific incidents, “one of which I saw and the other I received from an eyewitness” (167). James explains that there are only two American snakes “whose stings are mortal, [and] which deserve to be mentioned” “the pilot, or copperhead” and “the rattlesnake” (167).

James has “heard only of one person who was stung by a copperhead,” and recalls that the “poor wretch instantly swelled in a most dreadful manner” (167). In “madness and rage,” he “thrust out his tongue as the snakes do” and “hissed through his teeth” before dying “in the space of two hours” (168). James observes that, in comparison the “poison of the rattlesnake is not mortal in so short a space” (168), but that “[o]ne of this species was the cause, some years ago, of a most deplorable accident” (168-69).

A rattlesnake had attacked a farmer before “[o]ne of his Negroes cut it in two with his scythe” (169). He continued with his working day without incident and returned home, where he “pulled off his boots and went to bed” (169), only to grow sick and die in the night. The farmer’s son “put on his father’s boots” (169) and later died in the same manner. When “the widow sold all the movables,” a neighbor bought the boots and also grew sick but called “an eminent physician,” who “recovered the man” and discovered that “the two fangs of the snake had been left in the leather” (169) and had poisoned the farmer and his son when they removed the boots.

James also tells a tale he witnessed himself. Having climbed a large hemp plant on his property in order to watch “the great number of humming-birds with which our country abounds” (171), he saw two snakes fighting. The “aggressor was of the black kind, six feet long; the fugitive was a water snake, nearly of equal dimensions” (172). The two struggled together, with the water snake attempting to flee. Eventually, they accidentally “plunged into [a] ditch” (173) filled with water. The black snake held the other “under the water, until it was stifled and sunk,” and then “returned on shore and disappeared” (173).

Letter XI Summary: “From Mr. Iw—n Al—z, a Russian Gentleman, Describing the Visit he Paid at my Request to Mr. John Bertram, the Celebrated Pennsylvanian Botanist”

Iwan finds John working on his farm alongside his laborers and asks to “spend a few hours in [his] garden” (176). John says that “the greatest advantage […] [of] what thee callest my botanical fame” is that it means John receives “the visits of friends and foreigners” (176). He invites Iwan to dine with him; his family, his workers, and “his Negroes,” all sit at “a long table full of victuals” (177). John explains that although his community “never knew how to use ceremonies” and were “utterly strangers to what the world calleth polite expressions,” they “treat others as [they] treat [them]selves” (177).

After dinner, John shows Iwan around his property, including a greenhouse with the words “Slave to no sect, who takes no private road, But looks through nature, up to nature’s God!” (180) written over the door. The “sun [i]s almost down” by the time their tour is over and, worried that it would seem improper, Iwan “bluntly inform[s] him of the pleasure [he] had enjoyed, and with the desire [he] had of staying a few days with him” (180). John says Iwan is “as welcome as if [John] was thy father,” adding that “thy desire for knowledge […] entitleth thee to consider [John’s] house as thine own as long as thee pleaseth” (180).

John next shows Iwan various developments he has made on his farm; Iwan declares them “a miracle of husbandry” (181). Iwan explains that such methods are not used in Russia because “[o]ur lands are so unequally divided and so few of our farmers are possessors of the soil they till that they cannot execute plans of husbandry with the same vigour as you do” (182). He also reassures John that “tyranny never can take a strong hold in this country; the land is too widely distributed; it is poverty in Europe that makes slaves” (182).

When asked about how he became a botanist, John replies that, as a farmer, he had thought it a shame “that thee shouldest have employed so many years in tilling the earth and destroying so many flowers and plants without being acquainted with their structures and their uses!” (183). Despite his wife’s objections, John “began to botonize all over [his] farms,” gradually expanding his range until he had “acquired a pretty general knowledge of every plant and tree to be found in our continent” (184).

Iwan asks John by “what means […] do you rule your slaves so well, that they seem to do their work with the cheerfulness of white men?” (184). John explains that they are free and paid “eighteen pounds a year, with victuals and clothes and all other privileges which the white men enjoy” (185). Iwan is impressed and declares that “happy would it be for America would other denominations of Christianity imbibe the same principles and follow the same admirable rules” (186). When Iwan says that regrettably, there are slaves in Russia “attached to the soil on which they live,” John warns that “the country can never flourish under such impolitic government” (186).

Iwan joins John at a Quaker gathering and is impressed with the humbleness and “[h]ow simple their precepts, how unadorned their religious system” (188). He respects the way they live “under the mildest government” and are “guided by the mildest doctrine […] following the doctrines of Jesus Christ in that simplicity with which they were delivered” (188). He enjoys the way the Quakers’ lives, beliefs, and practices are “entirely free from those ornaments and political additions which each country and each government hath fashioned after its own manner,” and believes that “a happier system could not have been devised for the use of mankind” (188).

Letter XII Summary: “Distresses of a Frontier Man”

As the Revolutionary War looms closer, James announces that “the hour is come at last that I must fly from my house and abandon my farm!” (189). He is filled with dread, and wherever he looks, “the most frightful precipices present themselves to my view, in which hundreds of my friends and acquaintances have already perished” (189). His whole community feels vulnerable and “never go[es] out to our fields [as] we are seized with an involuntary fear, which lessens our strength and weakens our labour” (191).

James’s loyalties are divided between his country of birth, England, and his country of residence. Weighing up the two possibilities, he notes that “[i]f I attach myself to the mother country […] I become what is called an enemy to my own region; if I follow the rest of my countrymen, I become opposed to our ancient masters” (193). A “lover of peace,” he despairs at the way “[t]he innocent class are always the victims of the few” and “[g]reat events are not achieved for us, though it is by us that they are principally accomplished, by the arms, the sweat, the lives of the people” (193).

Thinking of “the calamities that have already overtaken our poor afflicted country,” James imagines that he can “hear the groans of thousands of families now ruined and desolated by our aggressors,” and “cannot count the multitude of orphans this war has made nor ascertain the immensity of blood we have lost” (194). He speculates that, “[d]id he but know the circumstances of this horrid war,” the King of England “would put a stop to that long destruction of parents and children” (197).

Sick of politics and violence and finding no clear side to take within the conflict, James decides that, having “ceased to consider myself as a member of the ancient state now convulsed, I willingly descend into an inferior one” (201), and plans to live with Native Americans. He believes that he will “revert into a state approaching nearer to that of nature, unencumbered either with voluminous laws or contradictory codes,” because “far removed from the accursed neighbourhood of Europeans, [American Indians] live with more ease, decency, and peace,” and “though governed by no laws, yet find in uncontaminated simple manners all that laws can afford” (201).

Having “never possessed nor wish[ing] to possess anything more than what could be earned or produced by the united industry of my family” (202), James believes that the transition to this new society will not be difficult. Indeed, he asks “what is it to us whether […] we wear neat homespun or good beaver, whether we sleep on feather-beds or on bearskins?” (203). James recalls examples of white people who, having been taken captive by Native Americans and then released, “chose to remain, and the reasons they gave me would greatly surprise you: the most perfect freedom, the ease of living, the absence of those cares and corroding solicitudes which so often prevail with us” (204). In fact, James notes that “thousands of Europeans are Indians, and we have no example of even one of those aborigines having from choice become Europeans!” (205).

James plans to travel with his family, taking “but a few necessary articles of covering, [and] trusting to the furs of the chase for our future apparel” and “say[ing] to my Negroes, ‘In the name of God, be free, my honest lads” (209). James also plans “to build [him]self a wigwam” (210) and “plough, sow, and hunt, as […] require[d]” (211). He does not want his family to adopt all the Native Americans’ “savage customs,” as they “can live in great peace and harmony with them without descending to every article” (211). More than this, James actually hopes to influence his hosts by “retrac[ing] to them the great outlines of their duty to God and to man” and “persuad[ing] them, if I can, to till a little more land than they do” (212). He believes that “my example alone may rouse the industry of some and serve to direct others in their labours” (213).

James looks forward to what he believes will be a humble, natural, and rewarding life. He speculates about discourse in which “[n]ot a word of politics shall cloud our simple conversation” (217) and pictures a life in which he can “contemplate Nature in her most wild and ample extent” (218). He sees this as an aspect of his religious practice, saying that the:

Supreme Being does not reside in peculiar churches or communities; He is equally the great Manitou of the woods and of the plains; and even in the gloom, the obscurity of those very wood, His justice may be as well understood and felt as in the most sumptuous temples (216).

Letters IX-XII Analysis

The ninth letter marks a turning point in the book as the tone and content change from the optimism and arguably naïve celebrations of America found in the earlier letters to more “melancholy reflections” (163). Following his earlier celebration of Nantucket’s absence of slavery, James condemns the slavery he finds in Charles Town and the way “by virtue of […] gold, wars, murders, and devastations are committed in some harmless, peaceable African neighbourhood where dwelt innocent people” (153). Much of his criticism is directed at the self-centered refusal of Charles Town’s inhabitants to recognize the abuse and exploitation that underpins their luxurious lifestyles, as “they neither see, hear, nor feel for the woes of their poor slaves, from whose painful labours all their wealth proceeds” (153).

James sees himself as separate from such cruelty, as “so raw, so inexperienced […] in this mode of life” (155) that he is not yet “insensible to the pain for the objects which I every day behold” (156). However, like almost all Americans of the period, he is not necessarily entirely opposed to slavery. A slave owner himself, he admits that they “have slaves likewise in our northern provinces,” but insists that Northern slaves have better lives than their Southern counterparts “in every possible respect!” (156). His perception of this may appear naïve to modern readers as he insists that Northern slaves can “participate in many of the benefits of our society without being obliged to bear any of its burdens,” and even “enjoy as much liberty as their masters” (156). Nevertheless, prompted by the sight of “a Negro, suspended in [a] cage and left there to expire!” (164), he finds the more explicit and extreme violence enacted by slave owners to be both morally reprehensible and deeply distressing. This experience, and the subsequent reflection on slavery, sends James into a more generalized cycle of negative and despairing thought, in which he begins to condemn humanity as a whole, asking “[t]he history of the earth! Doth it present anything but crimes of the most heinous nature[?],” and suggesting that “man, an animal of prey, seems to have rapine and the love of bloodshed implanted in his heart” (159).

Allusions to the relationship between people and the environment they inhabit return; now, however, nature is seen as something dark and threatening, as James observes that “we often talk of an indulgent nature, a kind parent[…] Yet if we attentively view this globe, will it not appear rather a place of punishment than of delight?” (160-61). He begins to speak of the “pestilential infections which lay Nature to waste” in Asia, “the poisonous soil of the equator,” and “the frigid sterility of the north” that produces humans who “live and fare worse than the bears they hunt and to which they are superior only in the faculty of speaking” (161). He considers “how very few are the spots where man can live and flourish,” and despairs that “[e]ven under those mild climates which seem to breath peace and happiness, the poison of slavery, the fury of despotism, and the rage of superstition are all combined against man!” (162).

After the trauma and despair of the ninth letter, Letter X seems almost out of place, with its seemingly carefree consideration of American fauna. However, it is worth considering that the letter is apparently written only at Mr. F.B.’s insistence, and that it does, in part, focus on conflict between animals, foreshadowing the conflict explored in Letter XII. Letter XI is also free of the cynicism that pervades Letters IX and XII. However, this is because it is presented as coming from Iwan, a visiting Russian, writing about a famous American botanist. It is interesting to note that both Iwan and John, the botanist, talk in a manner highly reminiscent of the naïve enthusiasm that characterizes James’s earlier letters, picking up the same themes and making similar declarations, such as Iwan’s pronouncement that “it is poverty in Europe that makes slaves” (182), or that “a happier system could not have been devised for the use of mankind” (188) than that of the Quakers. As the conversation between the two men returns to themes of American identity and the differences between Europe and America, the character of John recalls the idealized inhabitants of Nantucket, becoming another exemplar of the American character and its humble hospitality. Speaking in simple and archaic language, he declares he and his community “are utterly strangers to what the world calleth polite expressions” and simply “treat others as we treat ourselves” (177), something he supports by telling Iwan that “Thee art as welcome as if [John] was thy father,” and inviting him “to consider my house as thine own as long as thee pleaseth” (180). Recalling the earlier condemnations of slavery, Iwan is delighted to learn that the African Americans working on John’s farm are not enslaved and are paid “eighteen pounds a year, with victuals and clothes and all other privileges which the white men enjoy” (185).

Returning to James’s experiences in Letter XII means a shift back to despair, as James prepares to “fly from [his] house and abandon [his] farm!” (189). He is torn over his loyalties to England and America, and horrified by the violence of war. Perhaps more than anything, he is filled with disgust at the destruction of ordinary people for the profit of social elites. However, where this was once something that he had seen as distant and confined to Europe, it is now something that he sees everywhere, as “[t]he innocent class are always the victims of the few” and “[g]reat events are not achieved for us, though it is by us that they are principally accomplished, by the arms, the sweat, the lives of the people” (193).

Disillusioned with both Europe and America, and recalling his earlier conclusion that “the state of men in the woods” is preferable to “civilized society” (163), he decides to live with Native Americans and “revert into a state approaching nearer to that of nature, unencumbered either with voluminous laws or contradictory codes” (201). His view of Native Americans has changed somewhat, and he now sees them as offering the kind of freedom he had once believed he could find among white Americans, declaring that “far removed from the accursed neighbourhood of Europeans, [American Indians] live with more ease, decency, and peace” and “though governed by no laws, yet find in uncontaminated simple manners all that laws can afford” (201). He believes it is here that he will be able to “contemplate Nature in her most wild and ample extent” (218), and embrace “the most perfect freedom, the ease of living, the absence of those cares and corroding solicitudes which so often prevail with us” (204) as “thousands of Europeans” (205) have done before him. Nevertheless, he still wishes to change his hosts, intending to “retrace to them the great outlines of their duty to God and to man” and “persuade them […] to till a little more land than they do” (212), ultimately still seeing his own beliefs and way of life as superior to those of the people with whom he has decided to live.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text