logo

36 pages 1 hour read

Stacey Abrams

Lead from the Outside: How to Build Your Future and Make Real Change

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 3-4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 3 Summary: “Hacking and Owning Opportunity”

Abrams helped found a nonprofit organization, the New Georgia Project, to register eligible voters in 2014. She raised millions of dollars and the organization submitted tens of thousands of voter applications to the state. The effort was a consummate success; yet, the organization was plagued with accusations of wrongdoing. By November 2, nearly half of those registrations were canceled by the secretary of state. Although, after a two-year investigation, the organization was found blameless, the New Georgia Project and Abrams herself were subject to criticism. She began with the best of intentions, but, because she was unorthodox in her approach to civic problems, her methods were scrutinized. Abrams uses this anecdote to demonstrate the difficulty of working within established systems, as they were not built for outsiders’ easy navigation. Abrams’s ultimate solution is to “hack” the system, to find a way to accomplish her ends outside of traditional means.

Abrams tells her reader to “look for an unusual point of entry” (99). Speaking primarily to an audience of outsiders, she relates the necessity of leveraging minority status: diversity quotas in the workplace and affirmative action in the university are windows of opportunity that they must not be afraid to open. She extols the benefits of internships and volunteer opportunities, even as she recognizes that an outsider might struggle to manage unpaid or underpaid professional opportunities and existing financial obligations. Abrams argues, however, that if a sacrifice can be made for this end, it is likely to be worth it because an internship can put an individual in the sights of decision-makers and in the same room as knowledgeable allies. In the long term, putting themselves in such a favorable position to learn, gain experience, and demonstrate their capacity to lead can pay dividends.

She tells readers that their lack of privilege may teach them to adopt humility, which is really a mask for self-doubt. Beware of crediting external factors and forces for one’s successes, she says, as this practice diminishes others’ sense of one’s capability. Rather than turning down jobs, tasks, and dreams for which they don’t have all the expected tools, consider what advantages they do have and can bring to bear. If this exercise is not enough to keep them from rejecting an opportunity outright, she recommends considering what it might mean for someone else to see them reach for more. Their example can encourage another to cultivate their ambitions and reach toward their realization. Paired with this chapter is a worksheet called “SWOT Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats,” a business evaluation tool that Abrams has adapted for systematic personal evaluation and development.

Chapter 4 Summary: “The Myth of Mentors”

Flush with student government leadership experience from Spelman and corporate experience from a respectable law firm, Abrams strained to become an effective leader as a newly appointed deputy city attorney. Her fellow attorneys bristled at her and let her know how much they resented her as a team leader. She recognizes her role in feeding their ill will with her arrogant attitude. Abrams recounts her conversations with financial manager Laurette Woods, who became Abrams’s sounding board and who advised her on better ways of exercising her power with her resentful colleagues. Ms. Woods does not fit the traditional notion of a mentor, as she did not share Abrams’s specialty and was not her superior. Nonetheless, Ms. Woods effectively became her mentor.

Abrams tells her readers that when they seek mentors, they need to be specific about the kind of mentorship they have in mind and the role they anticipate their mentor might fill. Abrams outlines four types of mentors: situational, sponsor, advisor, and peer. A situational mentor provides support related to one’s field, discipline, or specific task. A sponsor possesses a “position of access” (125-26) that can open doors. An advisor forms a more substantial bond with their mentee, advocating for them and considering their long-term personal and professional development. Abrams suggests that an advisor should have a contrasting background and/or point of view from their mentee, as the difference in their perspective will lend greater insights. A peer mentor is engaged in a similar role or circumstance to the individual, and their knowledge can provide keen insight into shared experiences.

Abrams maintains that effective mentorship is an investment on the part of the mentee who must actively nurture it and on the part of the mentor who must sacrifice a portion of their time. Self-reflection and self-awareness about their behaviors help us determine whether they would be receptive to another’s continual support and potentially brutal honesty. Abrams describes the mentor-mentee relationship as a “professional courtship” in which a mentee ought to consider their compatibility with their chosen mentor. Once they clarify for themselves the kind of mentor they are seeking, they can better establish healthy boundaries and a professional environment of mutual respect. Becoming a mentor is an opportunity to pay good work forward.

Chapters 3-4 Analysis

Having previously acknowledged fear that may keep individuals from achieving their goals, Abrams uses foils, characters with contrasting attributes, to describe ways in which individuals sabotage themselves through self-doubt or ensure their future success through confident action. First, Abrams describes a hard-working woman named Shiao who dreamed of joining an organization that provides aid to Latin American communities. Shiao would conduct job hunting research online but never applied for her dream position, citing all the reasons she wasn’t qualified. Abrams uses her example to demonstrate both how traditional approaches can fail and how her readers can frighten themselves out of opportunities that would have nourished their passions. Alternatively, Abrams presents Genny Castillo, an intern hired by Abrams for the Democratic caucus in the House of Representatives. Genny took initiative during her summer internship and, when it was over, made a case to Abrams about her valuable contributions. Genny was hired as a caucus services director and then as a manager for the caucus internship program and later became her own boss, founding a consulting firm to share with candidates of color her growing expertise in political campaigning. Genny’s decisive, self-assured action allowed her to carve out a space for herself in a field that held her interest and stoked her professional ambitions. Her exercise of an unconventional avenue of access—an internship—led the way to later successes. Abrams chooses the literary technique of the foil to further underscore the relationship between deliberate action and opportunity.

To this end, Abrams also uses the extended metaphor of a ladder to discuss opportunity and fear. She writes, “Owning opportunity can feel like standing on a rickety ladder reaching for something on a higher shelf, knowing all along that, with one wrong move, everything could fall” (111). Here she’s referencing the ladder one might use for upward mobility—academically, professionally, socioeconomically, etc. She suggests that the accomplishments allowing the reader to climb to greater heights are unstable indicators of their worthiness because their self-image is often constructed from others’ perceptions about them. Doubt creeps in when they see themselves not as they are but through the filter of poor expectations. To see themselves more clearly, they might depend on a trusted friend or mentor or analyze themselves with the stark objectivity of the SWOT exercise.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Stacey Abrams