logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Ibram X. Kendi

How to Be an Antiracist

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 10-12Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 10 Summary: “White”

When Kendi attended college at Florida A&M, he would often present his theories about race to his friend, Clarence, who tolerated the conversation. Once, Kendi proposed his theory that White people are “aliens” (133), and Clarence ridicules him. Kendi took his idea about White people further by penning an editorial for The Famuan college newspaper in which he wrote that Black people should stop hating White people because “Europeans are simply a different breed of human” (135). His remarks caused alarm in White readers, and Kendi’s boss at his newspaper internship at the Tallahassee Democrat took notice, as well, giving him an ultimatum to pull the column or lose his job. Kendi explains the resolution to this anecdote in the following chapter.

Kendi reflects on the election of George W. Bush where many Black people were prevented from voting—especially in Florida. Black people were 11% of registered voters, but 44% of their votes were purged. Kendi reports that Black people are ten times more likely to have their votes rejected. He attributes this to Bush’s victory in the elections where 179,855 votes were rejected, leading to his victory by 537 votes.

After the push for a recount vote, Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore conceded. For Kendi, this indicated the party’s failure to pursue how Black votes became lost in the election. He believes that Gore and the other White Democrats did not have the interests of disenfranchised Black voters at heart.

Kendi’s first exposure to hatred of White people came from his reading Elijah Muhammed’s Message to the Blackman in America, which tells the story of White invaders threatening thriving communities of Black people. As the leader of the Nation of Islam (NOI), Muhammed believed in White people’s inferiority to Black people. According to Kendi, “The NOI’s history of White people was the racist history of Black people in Whiteface” (126). These ideas would come to influence Black revolutionary leader Malcolm X while he was in prison and who then grew his work with the Nation of Islam after his prison release in 1952. However, in 1964, Malcolm X eventually disavowed “Elijah Muhammed’s racist philosophy” (128) when he made his hajj to Mecca and changed his name to el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz, converting to orthodox Islam.

While Kendi believes that “Black people can be racist toward White people” (128), he cautions that this should not be confused with the accusations of reverse racism White people often level against people of color. Kendi maintains that racism harms White people too, though they often struggle to realize it in their accusations of reverse racism. Racist power structures convince White people that inequities they experience have to do with “personal failure” (129) and are not policy related; this can lead them to believe their issues are caused by White discrimination. In fact, White people’s lack of recognition of their racist power often means that they act against their own interests. Kendi argues that “White supremacist is code for anti-White” (131).

White people’s claims of reverse racism have an extended history. Upon the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, granting Black people citizenship rights, White people—like US President Andrew Johnson—claimed the “bill [was] made to operate in favor of the colored against the white race” (129). In 2013, when Alicia Garza used the phrase, “Black Lives Matter” in a letter posted on Facebook, sparking the Black Lives Matter movement, New York City former Mayor Rudy Giuliani called the movement “inherently racist” (130).

While Kendi disagrees with the concept of reverse racism, he expresses that, “Anti-White racist ideas are usually a reflexive reaction to White racism” (131). However, anti-White sentiments still operate using the same racist logic that White people have utilized for centuries against Black people. Thus, Kendi argues that “hating White people becomes hating Black people” (131).

Kendi did not easily come to these realizations about Black and White identity, as indicated by the aforementioned conversation with Clarence. During the early years of college, he tried to locate the source of “White evil” (132). He read thinkers like Cheikh Anta Diop who championed the two-cradle theory, suggesting that Europeans’ warlike behavior was a result of being from northern climates, whereas the more communal and spiritual Africans derive their demeanor from the amenable climates and resources of the south. Authors like Michael Bradley of The Iceman Inheritance posits White man’s anger is due to his rough upbringing during the Ice Age. Meanwhile, psychiatrist Frances Cress Welsing claims White people are “defending against their own genetic annihilation” (133). While these ideas fueled Kendi’s ideologies as a young college student, he evolved his thinking through continued education.

Chapter 11 Summary: “Black”

After Kendi penned his controversial editorial in The Famuan, his supervisor at the Tallahassee Democrat, Mizell Stewart, called Kendi into the office. Stewart distinguished Black people in an elitist manner, referring to poor Black people who deviate from societal norms as “them n*****s” (136). Stewart gave Kendi the ultimatum to pull the column or lose his internship, which he needed in order to graduate. Kendi opted for the former but admits he did so “in absolute bitterness” (109). While he felt angry and discouraged by the experience, it also motivated him to learn more about Black identity, and he started a second major in African American studies.

Reflecting on Stewart’s comment, which emphasized a distinction between different classes of Black people, Kendi is reminded of Chris Rock’s 1996 stand-up special, Bring the Pain. During the show, Rock makes jokes about different kinds of Black people, referring to poor Black people as “them n*****s.” Kendi believes there is a correlation between this attitude held by Black people and the identification of racism’s impacts on their lives. In a survey conducted in 1993, 40% of Black people stated they thought racism was the source of the inequities they experienced. During Barack Obama’s presidency in 2013, only 37% held this sentiment. This number increased to 59% in 2017 after the election of Donald Trump.

The belief that Black people do not have the ability to be racist is part of what Kendi dubs the “powerless defense” (140), which claims that because Black people lack power, they do not have the potential to be racist. This belief overlooks the influential Black policymakers instituting racist policies. During the 2000 election, when several Ohio voters found that their votes were improperly purged, Ken Blackwell—Ohio’s Black Secretary of State and George W. Bush’s Ohio campaign co-chair—was responsible for blocking voters’ access to provisional ballots by imposing numerous barriers: only permitting voter registration forms on certain paper stock and misinforming formerly incarcerated Black people that they cannot vote. Because of his “state-of-the-art racist work suppressing Black votes for Bush’s reelection” (143), in 2017, Blackwell was asked to join Donald Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

Kendi traces the history of Black influential figures who acted against the best interests of other Black people. In 1526, Leo Africanus—an enslaved Moroccan Moor given his name after he was freed by Pope Leo X—penned Della descrittione dell’Africa (Description of Africa), in which he describes Africans as “beastly” (144) for a White European audience. In 1657, Richard Ligon’s A True and Exact History of the Island of Barbadoes tells the story of the slave Sambo who reveals to slave owners the plot of a slave revolt and refuses reward for his betrayal.

There was also house slave Peter Prioleau’s betrayal of Denmark Vesey and other enslaved Black people organizing a revolt in Charleston, South Carolina. While Vesey warned recruits against telling other slaves who “receive presents of old coats from their masters” (145) about the revolt, one recruiter did not listen and told Peter. Peter informed his master, which resulted in the end of the rebellion and Vesey’s hanging. Peter, upon emancipation by South Carolina legislature for his allegiance to White slave owners, received a lifetime annual pension and eventually kept his own slaves.

These instances of betrayal by Black people against other Black people persist in modern forms. Author William Hannibal Thomas published The American Negro in 1901 at the same as Booker T. Washington’s Up from Slavery. Thomas and Washington were both touted as authorities on Black identity at the time. However, they held opposing views: Thomas believed Black people were an “intrinsically inferior type of humanity” (146).

Placing Black figures in positions of authority does not necessarily eliminate the issue of racism. This was clear in the efforts of the 1960s to diversify the police force. The hiring of Black cops did not decrease police brutality. In fact, Kendi argues that Black people in positions of power have the capacity to harm other Black people as well. During Ronald Reagan’s presidency, he appointed several Black administrators under his cabinet— including Clarence Thomas as the director of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. During Thomas’s tenure, he doubled the dismissal of discrimination cases. Similarly, Samuel Pierce, the secretary of Department of Housing and Urban Development, redirected funds for low-income housing to Republican efforts.

Chapter 12 Summary: “Class”

When Kendi moved to North Philadelphia to attend graduate school at Temple University, he lived in an area considered the “dark ghetto” (151) as it was a poor Black neighborhood. At the time, he believed that being near Black poverty made him more authentic as a Black person. Living in North Philadelphia made him feel “so real, so Black” though he eventually realized he was “playing poor Blacks cheap as human beings” (164-65).

Kendi’s early ideas overlooking the entwinement of issues of race and class are reflected throughout history, which always blamed poverty on individual failures. In 1959, anthropologist Oscar Lewis wrote about the “culture of poverty” (153) in his ethnography of Mexican families, which blamed poor people for perpetuating their own poverty without acknowledging the role of inequitable policymaking against nonwhite communities. This idea was an extension of the belief that governmental welfare programs perpetuated poverty rather than assist the poor, propagated by politicians like senator Barry Goldwater who wrote in The Conscience of the Conservative in 1960 that welfare “transforms the individual from a dignified, industrious, self-reliant spiritual being into a dependent animal creature without his knowing it” (154).

Black people and people of color also perpetuate these ideas about race and poverty. Former president Barack Obama held similar ideas, referring to Black poverty as part of a “legacy of defeat” (155), suggesting that Black people’s impoverished circumstances are partially their own doing. Similarly, W.E.B. Du Bois once believed in the idea of the “Talented Tenth” (156), which held that Black elites would save poor Black people from their economic circumstances. He later revised this idea after encountering the thinking of Karl Marx, and developed his theory of the “Guiding One Hundredth” (160), which recognized the power of poor Black people.

Kendi posits that racism and capitalism have always been entwined since the beginning of the transatlantic slave trade of Black people. While power was once concentrated through Portugal and other European countries involved in the slave trade, economic power is now consolidated in the hands of the US, Europe, China, and satellite nations beholden to these countries. The inequities that existed during the 16th century slave trade now manifest in the forms of poverty, unemployment, and wealth disparities between Black and White people. Globally, there is a widening gap between the wealthy and the poor as well as an expansion of a White middle class. For Kendi, these modern manifestations of economic inequity are racially inflected, bearing especially heavily on poor Black people who face a “double burden” (158) as they are more likely to live in high-poverty areas. Therefore, their poverty is more visible and concentrated.

Conservatives and liberals can be equal defenders of capitalism. Kendi uses US Senator Elizabeth Warren as an example of someone who envisions a fairer economic system of capitalism. However, by insisting on fairness rather than the undoing of capitalism, Warren falls into the liberal assumption that racial inequity has nothing to do with capitalism. Undoing capitalism is part of antiracist work. By insisting on an inequitable system, conservative and liberal parties alike ultimately perpetuate the work of racism.

Chapters 10-12 Analysis

In Chapter 10, Kendi examines the notion of anti-Whiteness and how he came to learn that this attitude reinforces racist ideas, as well. He refers to the animosity towards White people as “a reflexive reaction to White racism” (131) to offer context for this sentiment. However, he is critical of anti-Whiteness as it draws from the same foundations of racist thinking as anti-Blackness. Both sentiments reference Whiteness as a social and cultural standard. When Kendi argues that “hating White people becomes hating Black people,” he is suggesting that anti-Whiteness gives more power to racist platforms. The more effective antiracist approach is to advocate for more just standards recognizing racial and cultural differences. Reactionary attitudes toward White racism do not help achieve this.

In Chapters 11 and 12, Kendi returns to his thesis that racism is less about the people who enact racist policies and more about the actual policies at work. He argues Black people have the potential to erect racist policies and therefore can also be racist. The common perception is that Black people cannot be racist because they are the most marginalized racial group. Kendi disagrees with this notion as it utilizes what he calls the “powerless defense” (140), which is the assumption that Black people’s marginality prevents them from doing any harm.

Kendi offers historical examples suggesting that Black people with influence have enacted racist harm. For instance, William Hannibal Thomas was one of the most well-known Black thinkers of his time, and yet, his ideas about Black people as “intrinsically inferior type of humanity” operated against the interests of the Black community. His influence enabled the fortification of racist ideas against Black people among both White and Black people. Thus, for his definition of racism, it is not useful for Kendi to solely focus on individual racist actions by White people, but to identify the power of influence which ultimately has greater repercussions for Black people at large.

Finally, Kendi proposes the contentious argument that racism is an inherent component of capitalism, and that by reinforcing capitalism a person also reinforces racism. Given the confluence of record rates of income inequality and a raised awareness of police brutality and systemic racism in the early 2020s, this debate has become highly visible in recent years. In June 2020, the landmark political activist Angela Davis told WBUR’s Here and Now bluntly, “There is no capitalism without racism.” (Mosley, Tonya, and Allison Hagan. “‘An Extraordinary Moment’: Angela Davis Says Protests Recognize Long Overdue Antiracist Work.” WBUR Here and Now, 19 Jun. 2020, www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/06/19/angela-davis-protests-anti-racism.) This is also the central argument of historian Walter Johnson’s 2020 book The Broken Heart of America: St. Louis and the Violent History of the United States. In it, he writes that the racist aspects of capitalism go far beyond the slavery era: “The history of racial capitalism, it must be emphasized, is a history of wages as well as whips, of factories as well as plantations, of whiteness as well as blackness, of ‘freedom’ as well as slavery.” (Johnson, Walter. The Broken Heart of America: St. Louis and the Violent History of the United States. Basic Books, 2020.)

Others, however, take an even more grim view. In a response to Davis’s comments, WBUR columnist Rich Barlow cites research from Black studies scholar Cedric Robinson suggesting that capitalism evolved out of societies and economic systems that were already racist. Barlow writes, “My point isn’t to deny US capitalism’s systemic racism. It is, rather, to snuff out knee-jerk, utopian notions that racism is anything less than a universal infestation among different economies and cultures.” (Barlow, Rich. “Capitalism Isn’t Racist. We Are.” WBUR, 17 Sep. 2020, www.wbur.org/cognoscenti/2020/09/17/racist-capitalism-rich-barlow.)

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text