51 pages • 1 hour read
Peggy OrensteinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Affirmative consent policies include laws that require an active “yes” during a sexual encounter, whether verbally or through body language, to prove evidence of sexual consent. This is a different tactic from the previous need to prove that a person said “no.” Antioch University was the first to implement an affirmative consent rule. In 2014, California passed a “yes means yes” law for colleges and universities receiving state funds. The law states that an assailant must prove “an affirmative, unambiguous, and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity” (199). New York passed affirmative consent legislation in 2015, and several other states are considering doing the same. As of Girls & Sex’s publication, all Ivy League colleges except Harvard had affirmative consent policies in place.
Affirmative consent policies changed the ways consent is discussed and understood. In particular, the laws move the discourse away from the notion that boys are aggressors and girls are victims, reframing the conversation toward what healthy sexual behavior looks like. The policies provide the opportunity to discuss what girls’ agency looks like when it comes to sex.
Compulsory carelessness was coined by Lisa Wade, a sociology professor at Occidental College. It refers to hookup culture’s dependency on drinking alcohol. “Alcohol, according to Wade, is how students signal to one another that the sex they’re having is meaningless” (117). Between 75 and 89% of college students get drunk before hooking up, averaging four or more drinks each time. Drunk hookups are more likely to include some form of penetration and are also most likely to lead to regret.
Young women tend to think of sober sex as more serious. They avoid sober, hookup sex because they don’t want their sexual partners to think they want relationships. In other words, being fully emotionally, physically, and mentally present during sexual encounters can be too uncomfortable.
Genderqueer is a term encompassing all nonbinary genders. It includes those living between genders, beyond genders, or as a combination of genders. Orenstein discusses the conversation among teens today regarding gender identity. For many, the possibility of being genderqueer is liberating. For others, it is confusing.
Orenstein finds that many aren’t comfortable with the stereotypical qualities assigned to binary genders. Orenstein writes, “When we’ve defined femininity for their generation so narrowly, in such a sexualized, commercialized, heteroeroticized way, where is the space, the vision, the celebration of other ways to be a girl?” (165). She suggests that this generation’s emphasis on gender identity calls for redesigning genders themselves rather than creating new ones.
Hookup culture is defined by noncommittal, no strings attached, emotionless sex. Sex is a replacement for intimacy. Hookup culture is common in colleges, where 72% of college seniors report hooking up at least once, with an average of seven hookup partners. Hookup culture both benefits and disadvantages girls. Young women feel encouraged to focus on other aspects of their lives, such as academics and personal growth. This differs from the past when many women aimed to find their husbands in college.
Orenstein speaks to many young women who felt empowered by hookups. However, she finds that while girls still care about their partners’ satisfaction and pleasure during hookups, boys are much less concerned about their partners’ pleasure. Girls rarely climax during hookups. Additionally, young people are less likely to learn about who they are through serious relationships, and they’re less likely to try out intimacy and love with a partner. Many girls participating in hookup culture are concerned with not “getting played,” which suggests they perceive relationships as a loss of self.
Sarah McClelland, a psychology professor at the University of Michigan, researches what she calls intimate justice, the idea that all genders have the right to equality regarding their most personal relationships. This includes issues of violence, bodily integrity, physical and mental health, self-efficacy, and power dynamics. Orenstein acknowledges that McClelland’s idea of intimate justice inspired her research questions in Girls & Sex. These questions include: “Who has the right to engage in sexual behavior? Who has the right to enjoy it? Who is the primary beneficiary of the experience? Who feels deserving? How does each partner define ‘good enough’?” (6).
Where earlier generations saw women’s objectification as something to protest, girls today see it as a personal choice and an opportunity for self-expression. Orenstein calls this sort of expression self-objectification. Girls continue to experience pressure to define themselves in terms of their appearances. Their senses of worth are reliant on whether they’re desirable, and they present themselves, in terms of what they wear and how they act, based on those terms. Self-objectification is associated with many negative consequences, including depression, body monitoring, negative body image, risky sexual behavior, and reduced sexual pleasure.
Young women feel empowered when they feel hot. Orenstein writes, “[I]t’s presented to them over and over as a precondition for success in any realm. But the truth is that ‘hot’ refracts sexuality through a dehumanized prism regardless of who is ‘in control.’” (43). While it provides the illusion of empowerment, self-objectification doesn’t change the culture’s harmful focus on women’s bodies over all else.
Sexual scripts are one aspect of “scripting theory,” which is the idea that people learn expected behaviors through various avenues. Media, especially porn, dictates behavioral scripts about sex. Bryant Paul, professor of telecommunications at Indiana University Bloomington explains:
[I]f they’re repeatedly exposed to certain themes, they are more likely to pick them up, to internalize them and have them become part of their sexual scripts. So when you see consistent depictions of women with multiple partners and women being used as sex objects for males, and there’s no counterweight argument going on there […] (35).
Orenstein asserts that pornography normalizes violence against women during sex, and those who watch it are more likely to believe “rape myths” such as victims asking for it because they dressed “slutty.” Even media that isn’t pornography is often “pornified,” including magazines like Maxim and television shows like Gossip Girl. Both boys and girls learn scripts that prevent intimacy and often prevent pleasure too, particularly for girls. For example, girls are more aware of what they look like during sex, and they’re more likely to perform during sex rather than have an embodied experience. Boys tend to expect the focus to be on their physical pleasure.
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
Jewish American Literature
View Collection
LGBTQ Literature
View Collection
Pride Month Reads
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Self-Help Books
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Women's Studies
View Collection