60 pages • 2 hours read
Nassim Nicholas TalebA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Fooled by Randomness’s author, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, is a former trader and a professor of risk engineering. He narrates the book’s fictional stories and provides its instructional voice. Although the book focuses on scientific analysis and the nature of analytical rigor, Taleb includes a great deal of personal background. He discusses his family’s roots in Lebanon, his immigration to the United States, his early years as a trader, his intellectual pursuits, and his skeptical view of the media. Taleb indicates multiple times that he is not above being fooled by randomness, and while he is critical and his tone can be biting, this enables him to maintain a sense of humility in the book.
Taleb is outright scornful of the media, particularly financial commentators whom he refers to as charlatans. As an example, Taleb describes noted journalist George Will as one whose “profession […] is merely to sound smart and intelligent to the hordes” (68). In general, Taleb expresses derision toward financial commentators who oversimplify complex topics to make them seem simple. By extension, Taleb also expresses his general frustration with information overload. Later in the book, he mentions that he no longer watches television, and when the TV set is on in his offices, he turns down the volume so that the pundits who are speaking appear to be clownish rather than intimidating.
Taleb often speaks of his peculiarities. He mentions that though he has great admiration for Karl Popper’s ideas, the man himself did not exactly live what he believed. Taleb is self-aware enough in the book not to present himself in the same contradictory manner. For example, he discusses one occasion where he recognizes that he reflexively reverts to being superstitious. He cites a few examples from his life and does so with gentle, self-effacing humor, noting that despite his intellectual bent, he is still prone to the same kinds of behaviors as anyone else. Taleb is also a lover of art and literature, and he speaks of both often in the book. He wonders how much of a role randomness may have played in the creation of Canova’s carvings on display at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. Toward the end of the book, he cites Greek poet Constantine Cavafy and provides both interpretation and connections to the ideas presented in the book.
Nero is a fictional character whom Taleb uses to illustrate contrasting methodologies for market trading. Nero is not a born trader; instead, he comes to the profession after seeing a trader arrive hastily in a sports car which he leaves for a valet to take care of. Nero, who had been working toward a PhD in statistics, decides to pursue trading that day. He is an all-around intellectual, having also studied literature prior to his graduate work. Part of what drives Nero away from the academy and toward the market is his perception of the excitement and energy in the profession, which he felt was lacking in academia.
Nero is a deliberate and contemplative trader who uses his intellect to make informed decisions. He is risk-averse and prefers to build his wealth incrementally over time. Taleb refers to Nero as a “conservative trader” (41). Taleb also says that Nero’s operating strategy is to avoid the rare event as much as possible, and this partly explains why his wealth is not exorbitant. He simply does not take unnecessary chances with the market. Later in Chapter 1, Taleb introduces us to John, the antithesis of Nero. John’s affluence becomes a source of quiet envy for Nero until one day he sees John in the driveway of his opulent house and discovers that the man has lost everything.
Later in the book, Taleb revisits Nero’s story and informs the reader that the character has developed cancer. Taleb uses the diagnosis as a means of examining survival rates and statistics. When Nero makes one final return at the end of the book, the reader learns that Nero survived his cancer diagnosis. However, Nero does something out of character and pursues a license to operate a helicopter, despite the greater physical risks compared to driving a car. Eventually, he crashes the helicopter and dies.
Taleb is scornful of MBAs in the book, and this is best represented by the character of John. Unlike the intellectual Nero, John is an MBA degree holder. John is a high-yield trader, and based on his accumulation of material possessions, including his house which is situated across the street from Nero’s, one might conclude that John is incredibly successful. He is 35 years old when he is introduced and on top of his profession after a rapid rise on Wall Street.
Much of what the reader learns about John is revealed through Nero’s distaste for John’s trading tactics and his lifestyle choices. Taleb describes John as not only intellectually lacking, but also as lacking in street smarts and common sense. John appears to have built his wealth by riding a boom in the market during the late 1990s. John and his wife are materialistic and, unlike Nero, like to show off their wealth.
While John’s lifestyle causes Nero some jealousy, he instinctively believes that John will at some point meet an economic demise because he has not properly buttressed himself against the rare event. Taleb attributes this to the fact that John “had too short an experience of the market (but also because he was not thoughtful enough to study history)” (49). Eventually, John experiences a complete loss, or what Taleb refers to as a “blow-up.” He loses everything, because “Markets went into a volatile phase during which nearly everything he had invested in went against him at the same time” (124). John embodies the problems that arise when a person misunderstands The Distinction Between Luck and Skill. John believes his success is due to his own brilliance, rather than due to lucky timing. When the market reverses, he is unable to recover. John’s downfall also illustrates the human impact of The Limitations of Financial Models and the Unpredictability of the Markets.
Marc is a 40-something lawyer who makes half a million dollars a year. He lives in the Park Avenue neighborhood of Manhattan, an area known for its wealthy residents, most of whom are wealthier than he is. To keep up with the neighbors, Marc overworks himself, which leads to the ultimate demise of his first marriage.
Janet is Marc’s paralegal whom he dates and eventually marries after his divorce. The pair have three children together. Janet’s immediate company consists of women who have much wealthier husbands than she does. In Janet’s orbit, she is constantly presented with evidence of other people’s wealth, which causes her to question whether her husband Marc is successful at all. Taleb points out that “As compared to the general U.S. population, Marc has done very well, better than 99.5% of his compatriots” (178). However, Janet still sees Marc as a failure mainly because of who she compares him to.
Taleb uses the story of Marc and Janet to illustrate an example of a key flaw in Human Perceptions of Cause and Effect, the survivorship bias. In this case, he argues that “Janet feels that her husband is a failure, by comparison, but she is miscomputing the probabilities in a gross manner—she is using the wrong distribution to derive a rank” (177-78). This happens as a result of Janet comparing Marc to the wealthier neighbors instead of to a different population. If she had compared him to the general population, she would see that Marc is by no means a failure. Taleb recommends that if status is so important to Janet, then they should move out of the Park Avenue area and find a place where the distribution shows Marc as successful rather than a failure.
By Nassim Nicholas Taleb