42 pages • 1 hour read
Michael LewisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Lewis begins with the story of Sergey Aleynikov, a computer programmer for the major investment bank Goldman Sachs. The FBI arrested Aleynikov in 2009 for stealing his employer’s computer code. He was described as a “high frequency trading programmer” during the proceedings but no one could explain what that meant (2), or what exactly his crime was. Lewis explains that financial markets’ participants often court disaster without quite understanding what they are doing or the consequences of their actions for the sake of making a hypothetical profit. The stock market is even riskier now than it was when Lewis began his investigations in the 1980s. The popular image of people yelling on a trading floor is no longer relevant; stock trading is now the domain of computers whose operations are far too fast or complex for any person to understand, even those that designed the algorithms. These markets are hopelessly opaque to the average investor and the broader public. Lewis explains these changes through the anecdotes of people like Aleynikov at the center of high frequency trading.
Chapter 1 begins in the summer of 2009 with a crew of 2000 workers laying an underground cable from Chicago to New Jersey in the straightest line possible. This massive effort was undertaken in secrecy. The workers knew nothing about why they were blasting tunnels and laying down the line. The project was the brainchild of Dan Spivey, a Mississippian with a background in the Chicago stock exchanges. Spivey believed that Chicago exchanges could gain a competitive advantage by shortening the time it took to complete a trade with the Wall Street exchanges in New York. Even a difference of a few milliseconds, one-thousandth of a second, could allow one exchange to execute a trade ahead of their rivals. Computer-based trading made it possible to compete within timeframes that the human mind could barely perceive. Existing communication lines between brokerages were inefficient because they ran along railroads or bounced from one population center to the next. Spivey’s alternate route between Chicago and New Jersey was more than 100 miles shorter and avoided pedestrian digital traffic. Spivey consulted a group of engineers and local government officials to figure out the physical and legal logistics of laying down such a line, and secured financial backing from Jim Barksdale, the former CEO of the internet company Netscape Communications. Barksdale and Spivey formed Spread Networks and began construction of the line in early 2009. They encountered many difficulties along the way, from crossing through mountains and rivers to worrying about exposing their plans to better-financed rivals. Spivey assumed the line would be attractive to major Wall Street players—although this was based more on intuition than empirical evidence. Spread Networks decided they could sell access to 200 firms for a monthly rental fee of $300,000 as well as an up-front charge of about $14 million for a total of $2.8 billion to help subsidize construction.
By 2010, Spivey began making quiet pitches to Wall Street, insisting on strict secrecy with each potential client. It was hard to prove that the concept would work while the line was under construction, and Spivey could not explain what the benefits would be under the best of circumstances. Even so, the simple possibilities of losing out to a rival or increasing profits helped win over many prominent clients, though some resented how they could only use the line for their own transactions, not those of their clients. Just as they were about to secure their clientele, the line hit a major obstacle in the Susquehanna River, and local business owners in the nearby town of Sunbury, Pennsylvania were suspicious of outsiders promising big money for a project they wouldn’t describe. Spread Networks managed to overcome both sets of difficulties and completed the line at 827 miles, 13 miles short of their original projection.
Chapter 2 introduces Brad Katsuyama, a trader at the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a minor player compared to the major Wall Street banks in the early 2000s. Katsuyama moved to RBC’s New York offices in 2002, and the cultural differences shocked him. The frugality and everyday kindness that Katsuyama considered normal from his Toronto upbringing had little purchase in the ruthless, risk-accepting world of Wall Street. An exceptional student and athlete, Katsuyama became a stock trader because it suited both his analytical abilities and the camaraderie of team sports. In traditional Canadian fashion, RBC culture prized courtesy and integrity, pairing Katsuyama’s professional skills with his genteel personality. Problems began in 2006 when RBC acquired a US firm specializing in electronic stock trading. Its new American employees brought in their own culture of chauvinism and willingness to ignore the law. RBC bought the firm assuming that electronic trading was the future, and while Katsuyama was skeptical that his new co-workers had the skills to fulfill this potential, he understood the significance of electronic trading. In 2007, Katsuyama noticed that when he clicked a button to buy a batch of stocks, the offers would either vanish or introduce new terms rather than process the sale at the advertised price. This meant that Katsuyama, whose job was to navigate markets for his clients, could no longer trust the information on his screen as an accurate representation of the digital-only market. He once sold a large volume of stock only to find the price of the stock plummeted as he finalized the sale, resulting in immense losses.
At first, everyone around Katsuyama assumed he was making a mistake. When it was apparent that markets were reacting to his actions, the software developers were stumped. Part of the problem likely stemmed from the rapid expansion in the number of digital-only exchanges since 2005. Complex algorithms could route trades in any number of different directions with variations in speed, since the major telecommunications carriers had not prioritized differences in milliseconds. These various exchanges also offered contradictory incentive structures, with some rewarding the trader for buying a stock beneath its advertised price and another punishing it for doing the same thing. This created incongruent results between different exchanges even when the trades themselves were similar. Katsuyama came to the distressing realization that new players were popping up and accruing enormous influence in this digital-only market, while knowledge of these new players often escaped the traditional powers on Wall Street. Confused and exhausted, Katsuyama nearly left the business until RBC asked him to take charge of electronic trading. He committed to figuring out the problem and realized that it went far beyond RBC. He lacked the technical knowledge to find the solution himself, so he recruited fellow Canadian Rob Park and a small group of computer programmers to help him. With RBC’s permission to lose $10,000 a day, they began testing a set of theories. The first theory was that the exchanges had developed a sequencing algorithm to prioritize certain kinds of orders over others, so that less desirable transactions became “phantom orders” when someone tried to execute them. This theory fell apart whenever Katsuyama’s team carried out an order with a single exchange. Katsuyama then realized that the most reliable exchange was also the one physically closest to his office, leading him to wonder if the incredibly small differences in time required to send signals to more distant exchanges could make a difference.
Katsuyama’s team wrote a program that slowed the delivery times to closer exchanges, so that their orders all arrived at the same time, preventing the more distant ones from reacting to movement in the closer exchanges. The program worked, and they called it THOR (Tactical Hybrid Order Router). THOR revealed that the “ticker tape” image of the stock market had become obsolete despite its relevance in the popular imagination. Computers could distort markets within thousandths of a second so that barely anyone noticed. The chief beneficiaries of this system were called high-frequency traders. Katsuyama wanted to blow the whistle on this market manipulation, but he needed somebody to report on HFTs and their activities from the inside.
Lewis emphasizes the human element of the topics he will explore by opening the book with three dynamic personalities: Katsuyama, Aleynikov, and Spivey. The heroes of Michael Lewis’s books tend to be brilliant, driven men operating in hyper-competitive environments. While their work is highly specialized and lucrative, they are nonetheless outsiders due to their temperament, conscience, or circumstances. Lewis’s outsider heroes often find themselves squaring off against the titans of their industry. These heroes provide a window into elite circles while also giving the reader an underdog protagonist to root for and identify with. Katsuyama is immersed enough within the structures of power in the finance industry to both understand its rules and resent their unfairness. Recognizing this unique position, he seeks like-minded friends to challenge those rules from within. Katsuyama’s unique perspective on The Culture of the Stock Market allows Lewis to narrativize his research on high frequency trading in a way that supports his primary argument. Lewis positions Katsuyama at the center of his exploration because he wants readers to understand the complex and compromised world of Wall Street while reinforcing the belief that there are people within those systems who have not given themselves completely over to profit margins and greed. This dynamic lays the foundation for Lewis’s exploration of Reform Versus Revolution in addressing inequality and exploitative practices within the financial industry. By aligning the book’s perspective with those of dissenting insiders like Katsuyama and Aleynikov, Lewis claims both moral and subject matter authority. Sergey Aleynikov is a less typical figure for Lewis to center in his work, as Aleynikov was arrested and criminally charged. Lewis’s However, Lewis distinguishes between what is morally defensible and what is legally permissible. Goldman Sachs, Aleynikov’s employer at the time he was arrested, is still one of the most powerful firms on Wall Street and precipitated the 2008 collapse of the US housing market (as described in Lewis’s book The Big Short). Lewis uses Aleynikov’s criminal status to argue that it is hypocritical that a computer programmer was arrested by the FBI on the basis of using his stolen code to “manipulate markets in unfair ways” while the executives who helped ruin the US economy walked out with massive bonuses.
Dan Spivey of Chapter 1 is closer to the mark of the usual Lewis hero archetype. He is a Southerner who learned the stock trade in Chicago when the overwhelming percentage of trades went through the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ. Just as Katsuyama’s outsider status as a Canadian in New York City makes him skeptical of the Wall Street status quo, life on the periphery helped make Spivey capable of insights that escape those who belong fully to the dominant culture. Monitoring the speed of signals to and from New York to Chicago illustrated the importance of speed, even by degrees of milliseconds, which those in Lower Manhattan and northern New Jersey had failed to notice. Spivey’s quest to build a line from Chicago to New Jersey is a logistically Herculean task that seems unfeasible partly because of its deviation from existing norms. When he completes the project, even outperforming some of its initial expectations, Spivey is presented as another outside who beat the odds through intellect and sheer force of will to revolutionize an industry.
The key difference between Spivey and Lewis’s other protagonists is the ultimate aim of his project. Spivey is no Wall Street insider, but his goal is to win their trust, and their capital, by offering them a competitive advantage, which they will use for the principal benefit of their own portfolios. This does not make Spivey a villain; Lewis suggests something admirable in his innovation and risk-taking, emphasizing the element of tragedy in someone so talented and industrious helping a corrupt system work more effectively, even if that was not his intention. Thus, Spivey is presented as an anti-hero contrasted against Katsuyama’s heroic traits. Wall Street is filled with talented people, and not all of them came from privileged backgrounds or fit neatly into its culture. What sets Lewis’s heroes apart is their willingness to sacrifice their own self-interest for a greater good, knowing that this will put them in direct conflict with forces more powerful than themselves. Lewis uses their combination of ambition and altruism to explore what The Desire for a Purposeful Life looks like within a corrupt industry. When Katsuyama recognizes the potential for high frequency trading, he sees it as a moral problem rather than an opportunity to enrich himself, although THOR presents him with the opportunity to make money in a manner consistent with his values. For all their intelligence and vision, none of Lewis’s heroes can challenge massive systems on their own. They need to build a team of genius misfits like themselves, with a broad range of skills and experiences, to achieve together what none of them could do alone. The heroes’ team provides the assurance that there are enough people within the system who are not completely corrupted by the allure of profit at the expense of all else. Katsuyama and his team, as reformists from within, are symbolic in Lewis’s argument for a redemption of the system; these heroes are examples of the systems of capital working well or morally.
By Michael Lewis