40 pages • 1 hour read
bell hooksA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
hooks reiterates that the feminist movement often focuses exclusively on male domination of women instead of enacting political change on behalf of both men and women. In doing so, such feminists inadvertently market their cause as having no real benefit for men instead of highlighting the ways feminism can create more fulfilling lives for men as well as women. hooks argues that by focusing on ending sexist oppression, feminism can “transform relationships so that the alienation, competition, and dehumanization that characterize human interaction can be replaced with feelings of intimacy, mutuality, and camaraderie” (34). should instead focus on creating new forms of discourse, community, and support between the sexes. hooks criticizes feminist organizers who emphasize the gender divide rather than these new, possible futures.
hooks refutes the theory that sexist oppression is the “original oppression” and the foundation of all social injustices. She instead points to the ways systems of domination are inherent in Western philosophies because of a cultural emphasis on superiority versus inferiority. This root idea gives birth to all forms of oppression, including sexism, racism, and classism. With this, she says that sexual oppression is not the basis of all other forms of oppression, but it is the form that the highest number of people experience in their daily lives. Because “it is the practice of domination most people are socialized to accept” (37), dismantling one system of oppression is impossible because all systems of oppression are connected within Western institutions and ideology. All forms must be challenged together.
hooks notes that the experience of sexual oppression is present in the family unit while other forms of oppression are enacted by others in society. Because of this, sexism morphs the positive aspects of familial bonds into ones of obligation and oppression. Some feminist discourse implies that gender equality would lead to devaluing the family unit, but for hooks and other Black women, family is one of their only sources of support and affirmation, a respite from external discrimination. hooks says one of the feminist movement’s principle tasks is reforming the family, eliminating oppressive structures and relationships while maintaining its ability to give positive, reaffirming social nourishment to marginalized individuals.
hooks reiterates that sexist oppression is one of many interconnected forms of oppression. While she focuses on feminism’s exclusion of class and race issues, she also highlights how racial justice, post-colonial, and Marxist movements often overlook sexism. She cites Frantz Fanon and Aimé Césaire as examples of post-colonial thinkers whose theories do not touch on sexual oppression.
Sexual oppression is perpetuated by the institutions in power but also by the women who act according to the rules of those institutions. In order to combat sexual oppression, hooks says that women should unlearn the teachings of patriarchy, develop political consciousness, and reinforce their ties to other women. Once class, race, and privilege divisions are eliminated, “sustained woman bonding can occur” (44). She calls for a more comprehensive understanding of sisterhood that incorporates more than just bourgeois, white women’s agendas. Otherwise, the feminist movement will be overcome with patriarchal ideologies.
hooks approaches the question of victimization from a racial perspective. She notes how white feminists are more likely to victimize themselves while, paradoxically, upholding classist and racist beliefs, stating that “[t]he image of the ‘strong’ black woman is evoked in the writings of a number of white activists” (47). While “strong” is a positive characteristic, Black women are often characterized as strong and capable to the point that their needs are ignored. This contributes to the false assumption that Black women do not need to be included in feminist discourse. hooks claims that feminists should define their own social terms and only then practice solidarity with one another. Sexist oppression and white supremacist patriarchy encourage women to act maliciously against other women, especially those from different social classes, economic classes, or races. Regarding race, hooks states that “[u]ntil white supremacy is understood and attacked by white women” (56), sisterhood can never be achieved, and the feminist movement will continue to be hampered by racism. Furthermore, divisions among women of color must be addressed and healed. Sisterhood, in its essence, respects cultural and ethnic differences and does not aim to create an umbrella of “sameness” over its members. Working toward solidarity means recognizing the experiences of other women as legitimate.
Similar to her discussion of racism, hooks notes that both first- and second-wave feminists did not address class issues. She asserts that while gender equality would improve the lives of working-class women, it would not undo the struggles that result from being poor. In ignoring class, she says that feminists “equated psychological pain with material deprivation” (60) and continue to perpetuate sexist oppression by, for example, hiring underpaid housekeepers to shoulder domestic labor. hooks concludes this chapter by stating that every woman should be invested in all women and fight different forms of oppression in solidarity, even if those oppressions don’t affect them directly.
By defining sexist oppression as a struggle between men and women, hooks says that feminists imply “that the empowerment of women would necessarily be at the expense of men” (68). Though feminists have historically grouped all men into a monolithic “enemy,” hooks argues that not all men share the same privileges in society. She claims that while Black men and women struggle together in political solidarity, further acknowledgment of gender solidarity against sexist oppression must be pursued.
hooks centers this “reactionary separatism,” as she terms it, in the false belief that women have only two options: to accept sexual oppression or withdraw from it completely into their own subculture. Instead, she argues that men also suffer from patriarchal systems, and the feminist movement should acknowledge this.
The “process by which men act as oppressors and are oppressed” (75) is most notable in Black communities, where men experience racist oppression from society but often oppress the women in their households. hooks believes that Black women are often reluctant to acknowledge abuse from Black men as it might lead to greater forms of victimization and abuse.
The feminist movement should include, as part of its objectives, ways for men to unlearn sexism. Though many feminists desire separation from men in order to care for themselves, hooks stresses the importance of building a community and changing all aspects of oppressive systems for a more balanced society. To achieve this, feminist writings should present praxis detailing how women can live their lives in conjunction with men, and vice versa. hooks believes it is essential for women’s liberation to view men as “comrades” and include them in social solidarity.
The discussions in these chapters reflect hooks’s collectivist ideology and emphasize The Importance of Solidarity in the Feminist Movement. This theme is expanded on in these chapters to include solidarity with men rather than viewing them as the perpetrators of sexist oppression. In Chapter 3, hooks argues that feminism should not be marketed as an attack against men writ large or dismiss the fact that many men—especially those living on the margins of society—experience racist and classist oppression. The feminist movement should “end the war between the sexes” (35) rather than perpetuating a master-slave power dynamic.
She links sexist oppression to colonialism, as post-colonial theorists argue that power, domination, and control are rooted in the very structure of Western imperialistic societies. hooks states that “all forms of oppression are supported by traditional Western thinking” (36). A key component of the “Western thinking” that hooks argues against is the concept of dualisms: man/woman, master/slave, white/Black, and others, all of which boil down to superior/inferior. Dualistic thinking implies that there are only two available paths of relation to society, rather than a spectrum of needs, desires, and opportunities, and it leads to a perceived superior relating to their perceived inferior through domination and oppression. With this, she recognizes that men are not the enemy because they are men; rather, power-driven racist and patriarchal ideologies are the true enemies of women and the feminist movement.
A central theme in these chapters is Feminism and the Family. hooks centers sexist oppression within the family unit as the form that most people deal with on a daily basis: “it is the practice of domination most people are socialized to accept” (37). Within the power structure of a Western family are parent/child and husband/wife dualisms, in which one person is oppressed while the other exerts power. Women, and then children, are subsumed to the husband’s/father’s rule. Simultaneously, hooks situates the family as the most important social unit for support, love, and nurturing, especially among Black and other marginalized people; family and the home can provide a safe space free from society’s myriad oppressions. Allowing ideologies of power and oppression to enter the family endangers Western society. Considering that hooks herself admits that her first experiences with sexist oppression occurred in her childhood home, she reveals a vested interest in revaluating how families can operate. In this way, she utilizes the feminist practice of making private lives public—making the personal political—to situate her argument in a mode that any person can understand. She moves for greater value to be placed on the family unit as a source of positive emotions and motivation.
hooks links the private, personal family dynamic to the larger, public feminist movement through the values of Sisterhood and solidarity (44). She argues for unlearning patriarchal ideology together, but this can only be achieved when women acknowledge real commonality instead of a white-centered concept of “common” or victimization: “women must learn to accept responsibility for fighting oppression that may not directly affect us as individuals” (64). She includes men in this notion of solidarity, reiterating the fact that they are not just allies but can contribute to and benefit from feminist reform.
By bell hooks
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Feminist Reads
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Women's Studies
View Collection